Comments on: .308 Win Velocity vs. Barrel Length — 28″ to 16.5″ Cut-Down Test https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2021/07/308-win-velocity-vs-barrel-length-28-to-16-5-cut-down-test/ from AccurateShooter.com Wed, 15 Apr 2026 14:06:46 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26 By: Mike https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2021/07/308-win-velocity-vs-barrel-length-28-to-16-5-cut-down-test/comment-page-1/#comment-61242 Wed, 27 Dec 2023 14:29:31 +0000 http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=66233#comment-61242 Msh… i’m sorry but you think 99.7% is acceptable in fine tuning a rifle? Why don’t you do the math on that for a 500 yard shot because chances are you’re going home hungry.

]]> By: Msh https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2021/07/308-win-velocity-vs-barrel-length-28-to-16-5-cut-down-test/comment-page-1/#comment-59894 Thu, 29 Jul 2021 10:35:33 +0000 http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=66233#comment-59894 With the advent of internal Ballistics Simulators such as GRtools, MV per barrel length and MV per grain is just a simulation outcome. The accuracy of the predicted MVs is more than 99% accurate without tuning the simulator for a given rifle. With tunning accuracy is 99.7%

]]>