<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sunday GunDay: New Anschutz 1710 for NRL22 and PRS Rimfire</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2022/05/sunday-gunday-new-anschutz-1710-for-nrl22-and-prs-rimfire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2022/05/sunday-gunday-new-anschutz-1710-for-nrl22-and-prs-rimfire/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:26:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2022/05/sunday-gunday-new-anschutz-1710-for-nrl22-and-prs-rimfire/comment-page-1/#comment-60536</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wayne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 12:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=67466#comment-60536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John,

Thank you for the question. This was a quick turnaround video opportunity so we used what we had in stock which was an off the shelf 0 moa Anschutz rail. This did required minor fitment. We&#039;ll be carrying a 20 moa rail for this rifle system very soon which is a drop in fit. That rail would be the preferred option.  Given our field expedient 75y zero, and the flat base, we did have to hold 10mils in the reticle to hit at 435 yards after running out of elevation in the scope. 

Thanks again,

Wayne]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>Thank you for the question. This was a quick turnaround video opportunity so we used what we had in stock which was an off the shelf 0 moa Anschutz rail. This did required minor fitment. We&#8217;ll be carrying a 20 moa rail for this rifle system very soon which is a drop in fit. That rail would be the preferred option.  Given our field expedient 75y zero, and the flat base, we did have to hold 10mils in the reticle to hit at 435 yards after running out of elevation in the scope. </p>
<p>Thanks again,</p>
<p>Wayne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Campbell-Smith</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2022/05/sunday-gunday-new-anschutz-1710-for-nrl22-and-prs-rimfire/comment-page-1/#comment-60517</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Campbell-Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2022 12:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=67466#comment-60517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting article. Could do with some info on how the picatinny rail was attached.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article. Could do with some info on how the picatinny rail was attached.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
