<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 17 Mach 2 &#8212; 2050 FPS Rimfire More Affordable Than 17 HMR</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2024/03/17-mach-2-2050-fps-rimfire-more-affordable-than-17-hmr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2024/03/17-mach-2-2050-fps-rimfire-more-affordable-than-17-hmr/</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:26:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mehul Kamdar</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2024/03/17-mach-2-2050-fps-rimfire-more-affordable-than-17-hmr/comment-page-1/#comment-61325</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mehul Kamdar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2024 07:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=70059#comment-61325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have long had a never before barreled Brno Model 2 rimfire action that I have been trying to figure out what to build upon. A constant thought was that it should be a 17 HM2, but the round&#039;s popularity has waxed and waned over the years. I am hoping to build a reverse taper barreled (19&quot;) rifle and to put it into a full length stock that hides the reverse taper. Perhaps it is time to bite the bullet and get it built. Thank you for providing the inspiration!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have long had a never before barreled Brno Model 2 rimfire action that I have been trying to figure out what to build upon. A constant thought was that it should be a 17 HM2, but the round&#8217;s popularity has waxed and waned over the years. I am hoping to build a reverse taper barreled (19&#8243;) rifle and to put it into a full length stock that hides the reverse taper. Perhaps it is time to bite the bullet and get it built. Thank you for providing the inspiration!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ELR Researcher</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2024/03/17-mach-2-2050-fps-rimfire-more-affordable-than-17-hmr/comment-page-1/#comment-61321</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ELR Researcher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 19:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=70059#comment-61321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From same linked seller, Bulk Cheap Ammo for cost:

17 HM2, CCI VNT, 17 gr., 2010 MV, 152 ME, $0.16/rd

22 LR, CCI Stinger, 32 gr., 1640 MV, 191 ME, $0.13/rd

The 22 LR exemplar produces 25.6% more ME for 18.7 less cost/rd than the 17 HM2.

Cherry-pick your data, like Hornady did, and you get a totally different result.  BTW, Hornady does not offer 22 LR.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From same linked seller, Bulk Cheap Ammo for cost:</p>
<p>17 HM2, CCI VNT, 17 gr., 2010 MV, 152 ME, $0.16/rd</p>
<p>22 LR, CCI Stinger, 32 gr., 1640 MV, 191 ME, $0.13/rd</p>
<p>The 22 LR exemplar produces 25.6% more ME for 18.7 less cost/rd than the 17 HM2.</p>
<p>Cherry-pick your data, like Hornady did, and you get a totally different result.  BTW, Hornady does not offer 22 LR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
