<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Daily Bulletin &#187; Cartridge Comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/tag/cartridge-comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 13:55:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Six-Five Smackdown: The .260 Remington vs. 6.5&#215;55 Swedish</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/04/six-five-smackdown-the-260-remington-vs-6-5x55-swedish/</link>
		<comments>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/04/six-five-smackdown-the-260-remington-vs-6-5x55-swedish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2019 07:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[- Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reloading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Tip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[260 Rem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[260 Remington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6.5 Creedmoor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6.5-08]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6.5mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6.5x55 SE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6.5x55 Swedish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6.5x57 Lapua]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cartridge Comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laurie Holland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swedish Mauser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The .260 Remington and the 6.5&#215;55 Swedish (aka 6,5x55mm SE) are both very popular cartridges with hunters and target shooters. The 6.5&#215;55 has a long military heritage and a great record as a hunting round. The .260 Rem, essentially a .308 Win necked down to .264 caliber, is a more recent cartridge, but it grows [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/cart6501op.png" alt="6.5x55 SE, 6.5 Swedish 6.6x55mm .260 Rem Remington Laurie Holland comparison"></p>
<p>The .260 Remington and the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/6.5%C3%9755mm" target="_blank">6.5&#215;55 Swedish</a> (aka 6,5x55mm SE) are both very popular cartridges with hunters and target shooters. The 6.5&#215;55 has a long military heritage and a great record as a hunting round. The .260 Rem, essentially a .308 Win necked down to .264 caliber, is a more recent cartridge, but it grows in popularity every year, being one of the top cartridges for tactical/practical competitions. It offers better ballistics and less recoil than the parent .308 Win cartridge. In our <a href="http://forum.accurateshooter.com/index.php?topic=3738126.0" target="new">Shooter&#8217;s Forum</a>, respected UK gun writer Laurie Holland provided a good summary of the differences between the two chamberings. Laurie writes:</p>
<p><img class="alignright" hspace="12" src="http://accurateshooter.net/pix/rem260aix300.jpg" alt="Remington 260 Cartridge">The 6.5&#215;55 case has 6 or 7% more capacity than the .260s, even more in practice when both are loaded to standard COALs with heavy bullets, which sees them having to seated very deep in the .260 Rem using up quite a lot of powder capacity. So loaded up for reasonable pressures in modern actions, the 6.5&#215;55 will give a bit more performance.</p>
<p>The issue for many is what action length is available or wanted, the 6.5&#215;55 requiring a long action. So sniper rifle / tactical rifle competitors will go for the .260 Rem with the option of the many good short-bolt-throw designs around with detachable box magazines (DBMs). If a bit more performance is needed, the .260 AI (photo right) can yield another 100-150 fps velocity, depending on bullet weight.</p>
<h2><span id="more-58043"></span></h2>
<p>Brass-wise, you&#8217;ve got really good Lapua 6.5&#215;55 off the shelf that needs minimum preparation, and it&#8217;s strong and long-lived. [Editor: And now Lapua offers strong, high quality <a href="http://www.grafs.com/retail/catalog/product/productId/22845" target="_blank">.260 Rem brass</a> that&#8217;s every bit as good as Lapua&#8217;s 6.5&#215;55 brass. Norma offers quality <a href="http://www.midsouthshooterssupply.com/item/0001320266025100/260-Remington-Unprimed-Rifle-Brass-100-Count-" target="_blank">.260 Rem brass</a> also. Both foreign brands are far better than the old Remington-brand .260 Rem brass.]</p>
<p><img class="alignleft" hspace="6" src="http://accurateshooter.net/Blog/lauriehollandx250.jpg" alt="Laurie Holland">For purely target shooting, I think I&#8217;d go with 6.5&#215;55 if I was making the choice again today for performance and brass-preparation reasons. In fact, I&#8217;ve considered going back to the gunsmith to have the barrel rechambered.</p>
<p>You want a multi-purpose rifle though and that makes things trickier depending on the bullet weight(s) you want to use. The [typical] 6.5&#215;55 and 6.5-08 throats are really designed for 140s, so 90-120s make a long jump into the rifling. If you&#8217;re always going to use 130s and up, it&#8217;s less of an issue. If you want to use the lighter stuff, I&#8217;d say go for .260 Rem and discuss the reamer with the gunsmith to come up with as good a compromise as you can depending on the mix of shooting. 1:8.5&#8243; twist is the norm and handles all the usual sporting and match bullets; you can go for a little slower twist if you won&#8217;t use the heavies.</p>
<p>Over here in the UK, in Scotland to be precise, we have a top sporting rifle builder (Callum Ferguson of Precision Rifle Services) who almost specializes in .260 Rem usually built on Borden actions. He throats the barrel &#8216;short&#8217; so it&#8217;s suited to varmint bullets, but will still handle the 100gr Nosler Partition which he says is more than adequate for any British deer species including Scottish red stags.</p>
<p>Accuracy-wise, I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s anything between them if everything else is equal. The 6.5 has a reputation for superlative accuracy, but that was high-quality Swedish military rifles and ammunition matched against often not-so-high-quality military stuff from elsewhere. Put the pair in custom rifles and use equally good brass and bullets and you&#8217;ll be hard pressed to tell them apart.&#8221; <strong>&#8211; Laurie Holland</strong></p>
<p><img align="left" hspace="6" border="1" src="http://accurateshooter.net/Blog/rem260holl2op.png" alt="Remington 260 Cartridge">After Laurie&#8217;s helpful comments, some <strong>other Forum members</strong> added their insights on the .260 Rem vs. 6.5&#215;55 question:</p>
<p>&#8220;To me, the .260 Remington has no advantage over the 6.5&#215;55 if one is going to use a long action. Likewise, the only advantage the .260 has in a modern rifle is it can be used in a short-action. There is more powder capacity in the 6.5&#215;55 so you have the potential to get more velocity plus there is a lot of reloading data available to you for loading at lower velocity/pressure if you choose. The Lapua brass is great and Winchester brass is pretty good at low pressures. Having loaded a good bit for both, the 6.5&#215;55 would always get the nod from me. To me, if someone wants to use a short-action, the 6.5&#215;47 Lapua is even a better option than the .260 for a target rifle.&#8221; &#8212; Olympian</p>
<p>&#8220;There is just one small item that has been missing from this conversation &#8212; the 6.5&#215;55 has a non-standard rim diameter of .479&#8243; vs. the standard .473&#8243; of a .308 and all of its variants. Depending on your bolt this may be an issue, or it may not.&#8221; &#8212; Neil L.</p>
<blockquote><p><b>Other 6.5mm Contenders: 6.5&#215;47 Lapua and 6.5 Creedmoor vs. .260 Rem</b><br />
<i>by Laurie Holland</i><br />
Since I wrote those words some time back, I’ve acquired the three small contenders – .260 Rem, 6.5X47L, and most recently the 6.5mm Hornady Creedmoor and started doing load development and comparative tests. All three rifles have match-length barrels (28 or 30-inch 1:8s) &#8212; two NZ True-Flites and on the .260, a 30-inch 5R Bartlein.</p>
<p>How the barrel is throated is a key issue with this trio. In my case, I have always had the feeling that the .260 Rem and 6.x5x47L are at their best with 120-130 grain bullets and both have been chambered to suit the 123gr Scenar seated optimally. Both shoot this bullet fantastically well at getting on for 3,000 fps using Vihtavuori N150. I’m constantly amazed by this bullet’s external ballistics performance at up to 900 yards. I’ve yet to try it at 1,000. No, you won’t stand up to someone shooting a 7 WSM or .284 Shehane with 180gr Hybrids or VLDs at 900 or 1,000 in rough conditions in an F-Open match, but that applies to the 6.5-284 too.</p>
<p>I’m very taken with all three cartridges. The 6.5&#215;47 Lapua is an outstanding mid-range number IMHO. The .260 a good all-rounder. But I have a ‘feeling’ that I am going to end up very fond of the Creedmoor and can understand its tremendous success in the USA. Over here in the UK, it barely registers with target shooters, and I doubt if at all with what US shooters call ‘hunters’, we call ‘deerstalkers’. Fortunately, I was able to get 300 pieces of Hornady brass a couple of years ago, but we can get very strong Lapua .22-250 Rem cases here easily and they can be necked-up / fire-formed albeit to produce a slightly short-necked 6.5 HCM.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/04/six-five-smackdown-the-260-remington-vs-6-5x55-swedish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big, Full-Color Wall Posters Show Cartridges at 100% Scale</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/08/big-full-color-wall-posters-show-cartridges-at-100-scale/</link>
		<comments>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/08/big-full-color-wall-posters-show-cartridges-at-100-scale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2014 14:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bullets, Brass, Ammo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Bore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cartridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cartridge Comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cartridge Wall Paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Bore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Man Cave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=53683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Need something for the walls of your &#8220;man cave&#8221; or reloading room? Check out these jumbo-size cartridge posters. The creators of the Cartridge Comparison Guide now offer three very large full-color printed posters. These can be tacked to a wall or matted/framed to hang like paintings. Three different posters are available. Rifleman&#8217;s Classic Poster (38&#8243; [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="font-family:tahoma;font-size:16px;;line-height:150%">Need something for the walls of your &#8220;man cave&#8221; or reloading room? Check out these jumbo-size cartridge posters. The creators of the <a href="http://www.cartridgecomparisonguide.com/" target="_blank">Cartridge Comparison Guide</a> now offer three very large full-color printed posters. These can be tacked to a wall or matted/framed to hang like paintings. Three different posters are available.</p>
<p><b>Rifleman&#8217;s Classic Poster (38&#8243; x 27&#8243;)</b><br />
The <a href="http://store.cartridgecomparisonguide.com/product_info.php?cPath=22&#038;products_id=44" target="_blank">Rifleman&#8217;s Classic Poster</a>, a full 38 inches wide and 27 inches tall, is the most comprehensive. This $19.95 poster displays <strong>272 rifle cartridge types at true size</strong> (within 4/1000 of an inch). Cartridges shown range from .17 caliber all the way up to the big boomers (including some cannon shells). The Rifleman&#8217;s Classic poster includes all American Standardized Rifle Cartridges (as of 2013) and many European rifle cartridges. The poster is a good representation of military cartridges dating back to WWI and includes cartridges such as the 13X92mm MSR and the .55 Boys.</p>
<p><b>CLICK Image to Enlarge:</b><br />
<a href="http://accurateshooter.net/Blog/rifleclassic01.jpg" alt="Big Bore Cartridge Poster Cartridge Comparison Guide" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://accurateshooter.net/Blog/rifleclassic02.jpg" alt="Big Bore Cartridge Comparison Guide Poster"></a></p>
<p><strong>American Standard Cartridge Poster (Rifle, Handgun, Shotgun) &#8212; $15.95</strong><br />
The 36&#8243; x 24&#8243; <a href="http://store.cartridgecomparisonguide.com/product_info.php?cPath=22&#038;products_id=29" target="_blank">American Standard Poster</a> displays 165 rifle cartridges, 55 handgun cartridges, and 9 different shotgun gauges. This includes all American Standardized Cartridges (rifle, handgun, and shotgun) available as of January 2012. All cartridge types are displayed in full color, <strong>actual size</strong>. The rifle selection includes all standard hunting cartridges from the 17 Mach 2 through the .505 Gibbs and .577 Nitro. Bonus cartridges include the .375 and .408 Chey-Tac, .416 Barrett, .50 BMG, 50-20 and 20mm. The Handgun section covers cartridges from the 17 HMR to the 500 S&#038;W. Shotgun cartridges include the .410 and 32 gauge up to the 8 gauge. NOTE: Wildcat, proprietary, and obsolete-historic cartridges are NOT included in this poster.</p>
<p><b>CLICK Image to Enlarge:</b><br />
<a href="http://accurateshooter.net/Blog/amstandard01.jpg" alt="Big Bore Cartridge Poster Cartridge Comparison Guide" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://accurateshooter.net/Blog/amstandard02.jpg" alt="Big Bore Cartridge Comparison Guide Poster"></a></p>
<p><strong>BIG BORE Cartridge Poster (215 Cartridges) &#8212; $15.95</strong><br />
The 36&#8243; x 24&#8243; <a href="http://store.cartridgecomparisonguide.com/product_info.php?cPath=22&#038;products_id=37" target="_blank">Big Bore Poster</a> illustrates over 215 large=caliber rifle cartridges, all shown <strong>actual size</strong> in full color. These include Standard, Historic, Military, Proprietary and Wildcat rifle cartridges side by side. Cartridges illustrated range from the subsonic .338 Spectre up to the monstrous .729 Jongmans. The poster also includes historically significant cartridges such as the 12 Gauge Paradox, 4 Bore, 1&#8243; Nordfelt, 50 BAT Spotter, .50 BMG, .5 Vickers, 12.7&#215;108 Russian, 20mm, 25mm, 30mm and more.</p>
<p><b>CLICK Image to Enlarge:</b><br />
<a href="http://accurateshooter.net/Blog/bigbore01.jpg" alt="Big Bore Cartridge Poster Cartridge Comparison Guide" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://accurateshooter.net/Blog/bigbore02.jpg" alt="Big Bore Cartridge Comparison Guide Poster"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/08/big-full-color-wall-posters-show-cartridges-at-100-scale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
