<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Daily Bulletin &#187; Comparion Test</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/tag/comparion-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 15:04:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comparison Review of Affordable Red Dot Optics</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2021/12/comparison-review-of-affordable-red-dot-optics/</link>
		<comments>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2021/12/comparison-review-of-affordable-red-dot-optics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2021 12:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[- Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gear Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bushnell TRS-26]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comparion Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Primary Arms MicroDot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Dot Sights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Optics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reflex Sight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vortex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=66912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Frankly, we are not big fans of Red Dot sights, as they are not a good choice for precision rifle shooting beyond 100 yards. But Red Dot sight systems do have a place for pistol shooters, night-time hunters, and folks defending their home and property at short range. Those considering purchasing a Red Dot sight [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.ammoland.com/2019/08/best-red-dot-optics-under-200-shootout-review/" target="_blank"><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/pix/ammodot1901fix.jpg" alt="Ammoland Red Dot Review Bushnell Vortex Nikon Aimpoint Trijicon"></a></font></p>
<p>Frankly, we are not big fans of Red Dot sights, as they are not a good choice for precision rifle shooting beyond 100 yards. But Red Dot sight systems do have a place for pistol shooters, night-time hunters, and folks defending their home and property at short range.</p>
<p>Those considering purchasing a Red Dot sight system should read the <a href="https://www.ammoland.com/2019/08/best-red-dot-optics-under-200-shootout-review/" target="_blank">Ammoland Red Dot Review</a> by former U.S. Army Ranger Rex Nanorum. Rex took four affordable (under $200) Red Dot optics into the field, putting them through their paces. Rex notes: &#8220;Red dot sights are excellent options for those wanting a lightweight upgrade to iron sights and those prioritizing speed over the maximum accurate range.&#8221;</p>
<h2><a href="https://www.ammoland.com/2019/08/best-red-dot-optics-under-200-shootout-review/" target="_blank">READ Full Ammoland Red Dot Sight Review &#187;</a></h2>
<p>Rex tested the five Red Dot units, evaluating them based on multiple key factors: weight, brightness settings, ingress resistance to moisture and particulates, range performance, and battery life.</p>
<p><font size="4">The Four Under-$200 Red Dot Optics were: </p>
<p><a href="http://amolnd.us/2yd" target="_blank">Bushnell TRS-26</a><br />
<a href="http://amolnd.us/2yg" target="_blank">Nikon P-Tactical Superdot</a><br />
<a href="http://amolnd.us/2yf" target="_blank">Primary Arms Microdot (Md-Ads)</a><br />
<a href="http://amolnd.us/2ye" target="_blank">Vortex Crossfire Red Dot</a></font></p>
<p>We recommend you read the full review, which includes detailed discussion of multiple factors. But there were some interesting &#8220;take-aways&#8221; from Rex&#8217;s Ammoland review.</p>
<p><strong>Dot Size</strong> &#8212; The Bushnell has a 3 MOA central Dot, while the other units have a 2 MOA Dot.</p>
<p><strong>Weight</strong> &#8212; The four units are similar, weighing 5.3 to 6.6 ounces.</p>
<p><strong>Battery Life</strong> &#8212; The Bushnell TRS-26 and Primary Arms Microdot enjoyed a huge advantage in battery-life, with a claimed 50,000 hours! The Nikon SuperDot offers 14,000 hours, while the Vortex Crossfire delivers only 7000 hours.</p>
<p><strong>Intrusion Resistance</strong> &#8212; All four units claim to be fog-proof, shock-proof, and water-resistant, typically good for 30 minutes immersion at 1 meter water depth. But the Nikon unit also has a particulate-ingress resistance rating. In the real world, keeping dust out may be more important than the ability to survice a half-hour dunking. In dry states such as Arizona, dust is a bigger issue than water.</p>
<p><b>The Primary Arms Microdot Earned Top Honors in Ammoland&#8217;s Test:</b><br />
<iframe width="600" height="340" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/9lGUYfbkpK0" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>Overall, based on a variety of factors, Rex the reviewer rated the <strong>Primary Arms Microdot &#8220;best in test&#8221;</strong>, followed by the Bushnell TRS-26 in second place. The Nikon placed third, while the Vortex was ranked fourth. Rex was somewhat disappointed with the Vortex&#8217;s battery life and brightness controls.</p>
<p><b>Newer Bushnell TRS-26 has larger objective and longer battery life than older TRS-25:</b><br />
<iframe width="600" height="340" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/CYbAU2NR4bM" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<blockquote><p><font face="verdana"><b>Review of Higher-Priced ($400-$1000) Red Dot Optics</b><br />
If you&#8217;re willing to pay $400 or more for a Red Dot optic, there are many good options. The same reviewer, Rex Nanorum, has tested and ranked five more costly Red Dot Sights:</p>
<p>Trijicon MRO – $400<br />
Vortex UH-1 – $499<br />
Meprolight RDS Pro – $610<br />
Leupold LCO – $700<br />
Aimpoint Comp M5 – $820 ($981 with LRP mount)</p>
<p>Of these units, Rex rated the Aimpoint Comp M5 the highest, with the Trijicon MRO Second.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.ammoland.com/2019/04/top-5-red-dot-sights-guns-rifles-shotguns/" target="_blank"><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/pix/ammdot1903.jpg" alt="Ammoland Red Dot Review Aimpoint Trijicon"></a></font></p>
<h2><a href="https://www.ammoland.com/2019/04/top-5-red-dot-sights-guns-rifles-shotguns/" target="_blank">READ REVIEW of Five Higher-Priced Red Dot Sights &#187;</a></h2>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2021/12/comparison-review-of-affordable-red-dot-optics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Four Affordable Red Dot Sight Systems Reviewed and Ranked</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/08/four-affordable-red-dot-sight-systems-reviewed-and-ranked/</link>
		<comments>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/08/four-affordable-red-dot-sight-systems-reviewed-and-ranked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 18:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gear Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Deals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tactical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bushnell TRS-26]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comparion Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Primary Arms MicroDot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Dot Sights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Optics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reflex Sight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vortex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=63092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Frankly, we are not big fans of Red Dot sights, as they are not a good choice for precision rifle shooting beyond 100 yards. But Red Dot sight systems do have a place for pistol shooters, night-time hunters, and folks defending their home and property at short range. Those considering purchasing a Red Dot sight [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.ammoland.com/2019/08/best-red-dot-optics-under-200-shootout-review/" target="_blank"><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/pix/ammodot1901fix.jpg" alt="Ammoland Red Dot Review Bushnell Vortex Nikon Aimpoint Trijicon"></a></font></p>
<p>Frankly, we are not big fans of Red Dot sights, as they are not a good choice for precision rifle shooting beyond 100 yards. But Red Dot sight systems do have a place for pistol shooters, night-time hunters, and folks defending their home and property at short range.</p>
<p>Those considering purchasing a Red Dot sight system should read the latest <a href="https://www.ammoland.com/2019/08/best-red-dot-optics-under-200-shootout-review/" target="_blank">Ammoland Red Dot Review</a> by former U.S. Army Ranger Rex Nanorum. Rex took four affordable (under $200) Red Dot optics into the field, putting them through their paces. Rex notes: &#8220;Red dot sights are excellent options for those wanting a lightweight upgrade to iron sights and those prioritizing speed over the maximum accurate range.&#8221;</p>
<h2><a href="https://www.ammoland.com/2019/08/best-red-dot-optics-under-200-shootout-review/" target="_blank">READ Full Ammoland Red Dot Sight Review &#187;</a></h2>
<p>Rex tested the five Red Dot units, evaluating them based on multiple key factors: weight, brightness settings, ingress resistance to moisture and particulates, range performance, and battery life.</p>
<p><font size="4">The Four Under-$200 Red Dot Optics were: </p>
<p><a href="http://amolnd.us/2yd" target="_blank">Bushnell TRS-26</a><br />
<a href="http://amolnd.us/2yg" target="_blank">Nikon P-Tactical Superdot</a><br />
<a href="http://amolnd.us/2yf" target="_blank">Primary Arms Microdot (Md-Ads)</a><br />
<a href="http://amolnd.us/2ye" target="_blank">Vortex Crossfire Red Dot</a></font></p>
<p>We recommend you read the full review, which includes detailed discussion of multiple factors. But there were some interesting &#8220;take-aways&#8221; from Rex&#8217;s Ammoland review.</p>
<p><strong>Dot Size</strong> &#8212; The Bushnell has a 3 MOA central Dot, while the other units have a 2 MOA Dot.</p>
<p><strong>Weight</strong> &#8212; The four units are similar, weighing 5.3 to 6.6 ounces.</p>
<p><strong>Battery Life</strong> &#8212; The Bushnell TRS-26 and Primary Arms Microdot enjoyed a huge advantage in battery-life, with a claimed 50,000 hours! The Nikon SuperDot offers 14,000 hours, while the Vortex Crossfire delivers only 7000 hours.</p>
<p><strong>Intrusion Resistance</strong> &#8212; All four units claim to be fog-proof, shock-proof, and water-resistant, typically good for 30 minutes immersion at 1 meter water depth. But the Nikon unit also has a particulate-ingress resistance rating. In the real world, keeping dust out may be more important than the ability to survice a half-hour dunking. In dry states such as Arizona, dust is a bigger issue than water.</p>
<p><b>The Primary Arms Microdot Earned Top Honors in Ammoland&#8217;s Test:</b><br />
<iframe width="600" height="340" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/9lGUYfbkpK0" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>Overall, based on a variety of factors, Rex the reviewer rated the <strong>Primary Arms Microdot &#8220;best in test&#8221;</strong>, followed by the Bushnell TRS-26 in second place. The Nikon placed third, while the Vortex was ranked fourth. Rex was somewhat disappointed with the Vortex&#8217;s battery life and brightness controls.</p>
<p><b>Newer Bushnell TRS-26 has larger objective and longer battery life than older TRS-25:</b><br />
<iframe width="600" height="340" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/CYbAU2NR4bM" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<blockquote><p><font face="verdana"><b>Review of Higher-Priced ($400-$1000) Red Dot Optics</b><br />
If you&#8217;re willing to pay $400 or more for a Red Dot optic, there are many good options. The same reviewer, Rex Nanorum, has tested and ranked five more costly Red Dot Sights:</p>
<p>Trijicon MRO – $400<br />
Vortex UH-1 – $499<br />
Meprolight RDS Pro – $610<br />
Leupold LCO – $700<br />
Aimpoint Comp M5 – $820 ($981 with LRP mount)</p>
<p>Of these units, Rex rated the Aimpoint Comp M5 the highest, with the Trijicon MRO Second.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.ammoland.com/2019/04/top-5-red-dot-sights-guns-rifles-shotguns/" target="_blank"><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/pix/ammdot1903.jpg" alt="Ammoland Red Dot Review Aimpoint Trijicon"></a></font></p>
<h2><a href="https://www.ammoland.com/2019/04/top-5-red-dot-sights-guns-rifles-shotguns/" target="_blank">READ REVIEW of Five Higher-Priced Red Dot Sights &#187;</a></h2>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/08/four-affordable-red-dot-sight-systems-reviewed-and-ranked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
