<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Daily Bulletin &#187; Feed Lips</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/tag/feed-lips/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 01:06:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>AR15 Magazine Torture Test in Shotgun News</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/11/ar15-magazine-torture-test-in-shotgun-news/</link>
		<comments>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/11/ar15-magazine-torture-test-in-shotgun-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[- Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[- Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AR15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feed Lips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PMag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Translucent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/?p=10012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Writer David Fortier recently conducted an extensive torture test of AR15 magazines &#8212; both polymer and metal-bodied. Fortier&#8217;s test results, some of which may surprise you, are found in David&#8217;s article &#8220;Feeding Your AR&#8221;, published in the latest (November 20, 2009) edition of Shotgun News. Fortier tested a variety of popular AR mags including PMAG, [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Writer David Fortier recently conducted an extensive torture test of AR15 magazines &#8212; both polymer and metal-bodied. Fortier&#8217;s test results, some of which may surprise you, are found in David&#8217;s article &#8220;Feeding Your AR&#8221;, published in the latest (November 20, 2009) edition of <a href="http://shotgunnews.com/" target="new">Shotgun News</a>.</p>
<p><img align="right" hspace="6" src="http://accurateshooter.net/Blog/armag05.jpg" alt='20 round AR15 magazine'>Fortier tested a variety of popular AR mags including PMAG, Tango Down, CProducts SS, Brownells, Bravo Company, Lancer, MSAR, and Tapco. The &#8220;torture tests&#8221; included dropping the mags on their feedlips from 8.5 feet, driving a full-size army truck over the mags, jumping on the mags, and deliberately tilting the followers. The mags were also tested for fit and function with live-fire shooting. Results were a little surprising. When dropped from 8.5 feet on their feedlipgs, the Tango Down, PMAG and TAPCO all split down the spine. <a href="http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=3&amp;f=17&amp;t=468826&amp;page=1" target="new">CLICK HERE for Test Photos</a>.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.lancer-systems.com/L5.html" target="new">Lancer L5</a> model seemed to be the toughest magazine tested, and Fortier noted how the &#8220;old-fashioned&#8221; aluminum mags did surprisingly well. Lancer L5 magazines have &#8220;see-through&#8221; translucent polymer bodies (similar to Sig 55X series magazines). In addition, the Lancers feature teflon-coated, hardened steel feed lips, and a rubber-coated &#8220;bumper bottom&#8221;. Lancer L5s are offered in 20-round, 30-round, and 48-round capacities. The 48-rounder employs a special coupler to provide super-high capacity for 3-gun comps. Below is a Lancer-produced video showing the L5s being dropped from 5 feet (on both base and feed lips) without injury.</p>
<p><a href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/11/ar15-magazine-torture-test-in-shotgun-news/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<p>Fortier, posting on <a href="http://www.ar15.com/">AR15.com</a> concluded: &#8220;PMAGs are very good, but not as indestructible as some think. Aluminum mags are not as bad as some think. You should consider checking out Lancer&#8217;s mag&#8230;they surprised me. If MSARs mag dropped free they would be an interesting option. Dropping mags onto cement is A LOT tougher on them then running them over with a SUV&#8230;. but all those videos from the various mag companies sure did work wonders for advertising didn&#8217;t they?&#8221;</p>
<p><img align="right" hspace="8" src="http://accurateshooter.net/Blog/armag02.jpg" alt='20 round AR15 magazine'><b>Old Metal 20s &#8212; Still Best Match Mag?</b><br />
Editor&#8217;s NOTE: I won&#8217;t speculate as to the best 30-round magazine for field and military use. But in all the ARs I&#8217;ve owned, and most of the AR target rifles I&#8217;ve shot, the best magazine for Bench use and High Power Match use was the old 20-round straight aluminum mag with silver-colored metal follower. These 45-year-old mags seem to work perfectly, even when the gray powder-coat has worn off in spots revealing a dull brass color underneath. The silver metal follower still works better than most of the new &#8220;no-tip&#8221; polymer followers.</p>
<p>There may be better 20-round polymer mags today, but match shooters won&#8217;t go wrong with the original metal-bodied straight 20s with metal followers. I&#8217;ve bought, sold, and traded many AR mags over the years &#8212; and my old GI metal 20s are the only ones I&#8217;ll never sell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2009/11/ar15-magazine-torture-test-in-shotgun-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
