<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Daily Bulletin &#187; Length vs. Velocity</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/tag/length-vs-velocity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 16:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>6mm Creedmoor &#8212; How Many FPS Will a Shorter Barrel Cost You?</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/05/6mm-creedmoor-how-many-fps-will-a-shorter-barrel-cost-you/</link>
		<comments>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/05/6mm-creedmoor-how-many-fps-will-a-shorter-barrel-cost-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 18:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[- Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bullets, Brass, Ammo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gunsmithing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tactical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6 CM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6.5 Creedmoor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6mm CM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6mm Creedmoor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Cut-Down Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Length Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Marr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creedmore Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Length vs. Velocity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magnetospeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rifleshooter.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Velocity Testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=62574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our friend Bill Marr of Rifleshooter.com has done it again &#8212; conducted a fascinating 6mm Creedmoor barrel cut-down test that reveals how velocity changes with barrel length. This time Bill started with a 24&#8243; Proof Research stainless steel barrel on a Howa action. Bill says this was a well-used barrel, with over 1800 rounds through [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/pix/billcut1900.jpg" alt="6mm 6.5 Creedmoor rifleshooter.com Bill Barr barrel length cut-down velocity test chronograph Magnetospeed chrono"></p>
<p>Our friend Bill Marr of <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/" target="_blank">Rifleshooter.com</a> has done it again &#8212; conducted a fascinating <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2019/05/6-creedmoor-effects-of-barrel-length-on-muzzle-velocity/" target="_blank">6mm Creedmoor barrel cut-down test</a> that reveals how velocity changes with barrel length. This time Bill started with a 24&#8243; Proof Research stainless steel barrel on a Howa action. Bill says this was a well-used barrel, with over 1800 rounds through it. So, the velocities might be a bit different than a new barrel of similar length. Bill cut the barrel down in one-inch increments. Here are some results from the test:</p>
<p><big><strong>24&#8243; Velocity: 2893 FPS | 20&#8243; Velocity: 2755 FPS  | 16.1&#8243; Velocity: 2598 FPS</strong></big></p>
<h2><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2019/05/6-creedmoor-effects-of-barrel-length-on-muzzle-velocity/" target="_blank">CLICK HERE for FULL TEST REPORT on RifleShooter.com &#187;</a></h2>
<p><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/pix/billcut1903.jpg" alt="6mm 6.5 Creedmoor rifleshooter.com Bill Barr barrel length cut-down velocity test chronograph Magnetospeed chrono"></p>
<p><img class="alignright" hspace="10" src="https://accurateshooter.net/pix/billcut1902.jpg" alt="6mm 6.5 Creedmoor rifleshooter.com Bill Barr barrel length cut-down velocity test chronograph Magnetospeed chrono">For this latest test, Rifleshooter cut the barrel in one-inch increments from 24&#8243; to 16.1&#8243; (just over legal minimum). Velocities were measured with a <a href="http://www.avantlink.com/click.php?tt=ale&#038;pw=164303&#038;mi=10077&#038;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.brownells.com%2Fsearch%2Findex.htm%3Fk%3Dmagnetospeed%26ksubmit%3Dy" target="_blank">MagnetoSpeed V3 chronograph</a> mounted on arm attached to the stock. This allowed the chrono to be adjusted inwards as the barrel was cut shorter, inch by inch.</p>
<p>For the 6mm Creedmoor cartridge, Bill loaded <a href="http://www.avantlink.com/click.php?tt=ale&#038;pw=164303&#038;mi=10077&#038;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.brownells.com%2Fsearch%2Findex.htm%3Fk%3Dhornady%2B108%26ksubmit%3Dy" target="_blank">Hornady 108gr ELD Match bullets</a> over 41.5 grains of Hodgdon H4350 with CCI 200 primers in new Starline brass.</p>
<p>The results were interesting to say the least. Bill reports: &#8220;Muzzle velocities ranged from 2,893 ft/sec at 24″ to 2,598 ft/sec at 16″ for a decrease in muzzle velocity of 295 ft/sec. Muzzle velocity changes per inch of barrel length ranged from 6 ft/sec per inch between 20 and 19 inches to 63 ft/sec per inch between 19 and 18 inches. Average velocity change per inch of barrel length was 37.9 ft/sec.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>Bill concludes: &#8220;An average drop of 37.9 ft/sec/inch of barrel is fairly significant and is what would be expected with a fast moving 6mm cartridge like the 6mm Creedmoor. While I’m used to seeing 6mm Creedmoors with slightly longer barrel lengths than 24″, when coupled with a sound suppressor the additional length can make moving the rifle quickly more difficult.</p>
<p>I’d suggest staying with longer barrel lengths wherever possible with this cartridge. At shorter lengths, it does give up more performance than its big brother the 6.5 Creedmoor.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<h2>More 6mm Creedmoor Velocity Data from 2017 Cut-Down Test</h2>
<p>If you&#8217;re curious about 6mm Creedmoor velocities at longer barrel lengths, back in 2017 Rifleshooter completed a <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2017/01/6-creedmoor-barrel-length-versus-muzzle-velocity-31-to-17-inches/" target="_blank">6mm Creedmoor barrel cut-down test</a> from 31 inches all the way down to 17 inches. The test included four bullet types from 95 grains to 110 grains. With the 110gr Sierra MK, velocity at 31&#8243; was an impressive 3110 fps. Surprisingly the velocity didn&#8217;t decrease that much for the first few inches. Even at 26&#8243; (a five-inch reduction), measured velocity with the 110s was 3073 fps, a loss of 7.4 fps per inch on average. With a barrel shortened all the way to 20&#8243; however, velocity had dropped down to 2949 fps, a significant (161 fps) loss. <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2017/01/6-creedmoor-barrel-length-versus-muzzle-velocity-31-to-17-inches/" target="_blank">CLICK HERE</a> for complete results from that <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2017/01/6-creedmoor-barrel-length-versus-muzzle-velocity-31-to-17-inches/" target="_blank">31&#8243;-17&#8243; Barrel Cut-Down Test</a>. </p>
<p><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2017/01/6-creedmoor-barrel-length-versus-muzzle-velocity-31-to-17-inches/" target="_blank"><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/pix/billcut1904logo.jpg" alt="6mm 6.5 Creedmoor rifleshooter.com Bill Barr barrel length cut-down velocity test chronograph Magnetospeed chrono"></a></p>
<p><big><big><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2017/01/6-creedmoor-barrel-length-versus-muzzle-velocity-31-to-17-inches/" target="_blank"><strong>CLICK HERE for 31&#8243; to 17&#8243; 6mm Creedmoor Barrel Test Report &#187;</strong></a></big></big></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/05/6mm-creedmoor-how-many-fps-will-a-shorter-barrel-cost-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
