<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Daily Bulletin &#187; Milliradian</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/tag/milliradian/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 12:29:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>How to Range Targets Reliably with FFP Mil-Rad Scope Reticles</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2026/02/how-to-range-targets-reliably-with-ffp-mil-rad-scope-reticles/</link>
		<comments>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2026/02/how-to-range-targets-reliably-with-ffp-mil-rad-scope-reticles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 15:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mil dot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mil Reticle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mildot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milliradian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milrad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scope]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=72486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MIL-system scopes are popular with tactical shooters. One advantage of First-Focal-Plane (FFP) MIL scopes is that the mil-dot divisions in the reticle can be used to estimate range to a target. If you know the actual size of a target, you can calculate the distance to the target relatively easily with a mil-based ranging reticle. [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/Blog/milrange03op.png" alt="NRA Video Milrad MIL mil-dot range reticle"></p>
<p>MIL-system scopes are popular with tactical shooters. One advantage of First-Focal-Plane (FFP) MIL scopes is that the mil-dot divisions in the reticle can be used to estimate range to a target. If you know the actual size of a target, you can calculate the distance to the target relatively easily with a mil-based ranging reticle. Watch this helpful NRA video to see how this is done:</p>
<p><iframe width="600" height="370" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/nid2OLmzDjo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p><b>Milliradian Definition and Yardage Ranging Formula</b><br />
&#8220;MIL&#8221; or &#8220;Milrad&#8221; is short-hand for Milliradian, a unit of angular measurement. The subtension of 1 mil equals 3.6 inches at 100 yards or 36 inches at 1,000 yards. (In metric units, 1 mil equals 10 centimeters at 100 meters or 1 meter at 1,000 meters.) Knowing this subtension and knowing the size of the target (or a reference object near the target) allows the distance to the target to be estimated with considerable accuracy. The formula used to calculate range (in yards) based on MIL measurement is:</p>
<p><center><em>Height of Target in inches (divided by 36) x 1000, divided by the number of mils.</em></center></p>
<p><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/Blog/milrange04.jpg" alt="NRA Video Milrad MIL mil-dot range reticle"></p>
<p>For example, if a 14&#8243; tall target spans 3 mils from top to bottom, the distance is 129.67 yards calculated as follows: 14/36 x 1000 = 389, then divided by 3 = 129.67. You can also use a different conversion to find distance in meters.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Can You Estimate Range with an MOA-Marked Reticle? Yes You Can&#8230;</strong><br />
Reader Josh offers this handy advice: &#8220;It worth noting that the ability to measure range is not unique to mil-based systems. A MIL is just another unit for measuring angles, and any angular measurement will work. Considering that just about everybody knows that 1 MOA is about an inch per hundred yards, similar formulae can be developed for ranging with MOA marks. The advantage with mils is the precise relationship between units — the MOA-inch measurement is imprecise (being off by 0.047&#8243;) — so in principle MILs are a better unit&#8221;.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2026/02/how-to-range-targets-reliably-with-ffp-mil-rad-scope-reticles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Range Targets Using Reticle Markings in Milrad Scopes</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2025/01/how-to-range-targets-using-reticle-markings-in-milrad-scopes/</link>
		<comments>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2025/01/how-to-range-targets-using-reticle-markings-in-milrad-scopes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2025 08:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[- Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tactical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mil dot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mil Reticle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mildot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milliradian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milrad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scope]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=71019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MIL-system scopes are popular with tactical shooters. One advantage of MIL scopes is that the mil-dot divisions in the reticle can be used to estimate range to a target. If you know the actual size of a target, you can calculate the distance to the target relatively easily with a mil-based ranging reticle. Watch this [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://accurateshooter.net/Blog/milrange03op.png" alt="NRA Video Milrad MIL mil-dot range reticle"></p>
<p>MIL-system scopes are popular with tactical shooters. One advantage of MIL scopes is that the mil-dot divisions in the reticle can be used to estimate range to a target. If you know the actual size of a target, you can calculate the distance to the target relatively easily with a mil-based ranging reticle. Watch this helpful NRA video to see how this is done:</p>
<p><iframe width="600" height="370" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/nid2OLmzDjo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p><b>Milliradian Definition and Yardage Ranging Formula</b><br />
&#8220;MIL&#8221; or &#8220;Milrad&#8221; is short-hand for Milliradian, a unit of angular measurement. The subtension of 1 mil equals 3.6 inches at 100 yards or 36 inches at 1,000 yards. (In metric units, 1 mil equals 10 centimeters at 100 meters or 1 meter at 1,000 meters.) Knowing this subtension and knowing the size of the target (or a reference object near the target) allows the distance to the target to be estimated with considerable accuracy. The formula used to calculate range (in yards) based on MIL measurement is:</p>
<p><center><em>Height of Target in inches (divided by 36) x 1000, divided by the number of mils.</em></center></p>
<p><img src="http://accurateshooter.net/Blog/milrange04.jpg" alt="NRA Video Milrad MIL mil-dot range reticle"></p>
<p>For example, if a 14&#8243; tall target spans 3 mils from top to bottom, the distance is 129.67 yards calculated as follows: 14/36 x 1000 = 389, then divided by 3 = 129.67. You can also use a different conversion to find distance in meters.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Can You Estimate Range with an MOA-Marked Reticle? Yes You Can&#8230;</strong><br />
Reader Josh offers this handy advice: &#8220;It worth noting that the ability to measure range is not unique to mil-based systems. A MIL is just another unit for measuring angles, and any angular measurement will work. Considering that just about everybody knows that 1 MOA is about an inch per hundred yards, similar formulae can be developed for ranging with MOA marks. The advantage with mils is the precise relationship between units — the MOA-inch measurement is imprecise (being off by 0.047&#8243;) — so in principle MILs are a better unit&#8221;.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2025/01/how-to-range-targets-using-reticle-markings-in-milrad-scopes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MIL vs. MOA &#8212; Scope Angular Click Values Explained</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2024/12/mil-vs-moa-scope-angular-click-values-explained/</link>
		<comments>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2024/12/mil-vs-moa-scope-angular-click-values-explained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 13:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[- Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bryan Litz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cal Zant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Click Value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FFP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milliradian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milrad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MOA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reticle Subtension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SFP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tactical Scope]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=70721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Visit PrecisionRifleBlog.com for a discussion of MIL vs. MOA. Many guys getting started in long range shooting are confused about what kind of scope they should buy &#8212; specifically whether it should have MIL-based clicks or MOA-based clicks. Before you can make that decision, you need to understand the terminology. This article, with a video [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://precisionrifleblog.com/2013/07/20/mil-vs-moa-an-objective-comparison/" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="https://accurateshooter.net/Blog/milmoa1402.png" alt="Mil MOA reticle ranging PRS tactical minute angle precision rifle series"></a><br />
<i>Visit <a href="https://precisionrifleblog.com/2013/07/20/mil-vs-moa-an-objective-comparison/" target="_blank">PrecisionRifleBlog.com</a> for a discussion of MIL vs. MOA.</i></p>
<p>Many guys getting started in long range shooting are confused about what kind of scope they should buy &#8212; specifically whether it should have MIL-based clicks or MOA-based clicks. Before you can make that decision, you need to understand the terminology. This article, with a video by Bryan Litz, explains MILS and MOA so you can choose the right type of scope for your intended application.</p>
<p><i>This <a href="https://marchscopes.com/scopes/d40v56fml/" target='_blank'>March-FX 5-40x56mm Tactical FFP</a> scope features 0.05 MIL Clicks.</i><br />
<img src="https://accurateshooter.net/pix/milmoa1602.jpg" alt="Mil MOA reticle ranging PRS tactical minute angle precision rifle series"></p>
<p>You probably know that MOA stands for &#8220;Minute of Angle&#8221; (or more precisely &#8220;minute of arc&#8221;), but could you define the terms &#8220;Milrad&#8221; or &#8220;MIL&#8221;? In a helpful video, Bryan Litz of <a href="https://appliedballisticsllc.com" target="_blank">Applied Ballitics</a> explains MOA and MILs (short for &#8220;milliradians&#8221;). Bryan defines those terms and explains how they are used. One MOA is an angular measurement (1/60th of one degree) that subtends 1.047&#8243; at 100 yards. One MIL (i.e. one milliradian) subtends 1/10th meter at 100 meters; that means that 0.1 Mil is one centimeter (1 cm) at 100 meters. Is one angular measurement system better than another? Not necessarily&#8230; Bryan explains that Mildot scopes may be handy for ranging, but scopes with MOA-based clicks work just fine for precision work at known distances. Also because one MOA is almost exactly one inch at 100 yards, the MOA system is convenient for expressing a rifle&#8217;s accuracy. By common parlance, a &#8220;half-MOA&#8221; rifle can shoot groups that are 1/2-inch (or smaller) at 100 yards.</p>
<p><iframe width="600" height="340" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ZKp4YiDdNls" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p><b>What is a &#8220;Minute&#8221; of Angle?</b><br />
When talking about angular degrees, a &#8220;minute&#8221; is simply 1/60th. So a &#8220;Minute of Angle&#8221; is simply 1/60th of one degree of a central angle, measured either up and down (for elevation) or side to side (for windage). At 100 yards, 1 MOA equals 1.047″ on the target. This is often rounded to one inch for simplicity. Say, for example, you click up 1 MOA (four clicks on a 1/4-MOA scope). That is roughly 1 inch at 100 yards, or roughly 4 inches at 400 yards, since the target area measured by an MOA subtension increases with the distance.</p>
<p><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/Blog/onemoaop.png" alt="one MOA minute of angle diagram"></p>
<p><b>MIL vs. MOA for Target Ranging</b><br />
MIL or MOA &#8212; which angular measuring system is better for target ranging (and hold-offs)? In a recent article on his <a href="https://precisionrifleblog.com/2013/07/20/mil-vs-moa-an-objective-comparison/" target="_blank">PrecisionRifleBlog.com</a> website, Cal Zant tackles that question. Analyzing the pros and cons of each, Zant concludes that both systems work well, provided you have compatible click values on your scope. Zant does note that a 1/4 MOA division is &#8220;slightly more precise&#8221; than 1/10th mil, but that&#8217;s really not a big deal: &#8220;Technically, 1/4 MOA clicks provide a little finer adjustments than 1/10 MIL. This difference is very slight&#8230; it only equates to 0.1&#8243; difference in adjustments at 100 yards or 1&#8243; at 1,000 yards[.]&#8221; Zant adds that, in practical terms, both 1/4-MOA clicks and 1/10th-MIL clicks work well in the field: &#8220;Most shooters agree that 1/4 MOA or 1/10 MIL are both right around that sweet spot.&#8221;</p>
<p><center><font size="5"><a href="https://precisionrifleblog.com/2013/07/20/mil-vs-moa-an-objective-comparison/" target="_blank"><strong>READ MIL vs. MOA Cal Zant Article.</strong></a></font></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2024/12/mil-vs-moa-scope-angular-click-values-explained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Know Your Optics &#8212; MIL vs. MOA Click Values Explained</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2023/11/know-your-optics-mil-vs-moa-click-values-explained/</link>
		<comments>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2023/11/know-your-optics-mil-vs-moa-click-values-explained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 15:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[- Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[- Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Tip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1/4-MOA click]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bryan Litz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cal Zant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FFP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milliradian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milrad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reticle Subtension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SFP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tactical Scope]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=69633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Visit PrecisionRifleBlog.com for a discussion of MIL vs. MOA. Many guys getting started in long range shooting are confused about what kind of scope they should buy &#8212; specifically whether it should have MIL-based clicks or MOA-based clicks. Before you can make that decision, you need to understand the terminology. This article, with a video [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://precisionrifleblog.com/2013/07/20/mil-vs-moa-an-objective-comparison/" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="https://accurateshooter.net/Blog/milmoa1402.png" alt="Mil MOA reticle ranging PRS tactical minute angle precision rifle series"></a><br />
<i>Visit <a href="https://precisionrifleblog.com/2013/07/20/mil-vs-moa-an-objective-comparison/" target="_blank">PrecisionRifleBlog.com</a> for a discussion of MIL vs. MOA.</i></p>
<p>Many guys getting started in long range shooting are confused about what kind of scope they should buy &#8212; specifically whether it should have MIL-based clicks or MOA-based clicks. Before you can make that decision, you need to understand the terminology. This article, with a video by Bryan Litz, explains MILS and MOA so you can choose the right type of scope for your intended application.</p>
<p><i>This <a href="https://marchscopes.com/scopes/d40v56fml/" target='_blank'>March-FX 5-40x56mm Tactical FFP</a> scope features 0.05 MIL Clicks.</i><br />
<img src="https://accurateshooter.net/pix/milmoa1602.jpg" alt="Mil MOA reticle ranging PRS tactical minute angle precision rifle series"></p>
<p>You probably know that MOA stands for &#8220;Minute of Angle&#8221; (or more precisely &#8220;minute of arc&#8221;), but could you define the terms &#8220;Milrad&#8221; or &#8220;MIL&#8221;? In a helpful video, Bryan Litz of <a href="https://appliedballisticsllc.com" target="_blank">Applied Ballitics</a> explains MOA and MILs (short for &#8220;milliradians&#8221;). Bryan defines those terms and explains how they are used. One MOA is an angular measurement (1/60th of one degree) that subtends 1.047&#8243; at 100 yards. One MIL (i.e. one milliradian) subtends 1/10th meter at 100 meters; that means that 0.1 Mil is one centimeter (1 cm) at 100 meters. Is one angular measurement system better than another? Not necessarily&#8230; Bryan explains that Mildot scopes may be handy for ranging, but scopes with MOA-based clicks work just fine for precision work at known distances. Also because one MOA is almost exactly one inch at 100 yards, the MOA system is convenient for expressing a rifle&#8217;s accuracy. By common parlance, a &#8220;half-MOA&#8221; rifle can shoot groups that are 1/2-inch (or smaller) at 100 yards.</p>
<p><iframe width="600" height="340" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ZKp4YiDdNls" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p><big><b>What is a &#8220;Minute&#8221; of Angle?</b></big><br />
When talking about angular degrees, a &#8220;minute&#8221; is simply 1/60th. So a &#8220;Minute of Angle&#8221; is simply 1/60th of one degree of a central angle, measured either up and down (for elevation) or side to side (for windage). At 100 yards, 1 MOA equals 1.047″ on the target. This is often rounded to one inch for simplicity. Say, for example, you click up 1 MOA (four clicks on a 1/4-MOA scope). That is roughly 1 inch at 100 yards, or roughly 4 inches at 400 yards, since the target area measured by an MOA subtension increases with the distance.</p>
<p><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/Blog/onemoaop.png" alt="one MOA minute of angle diagram"></p>
<p><big><b>MIL vs. MOA for Target Ranging</b></big><br />
MIL or MOA &#8212; which angular measuring system is better for target ranging (and hold-offs)? In a recent article on his <a href="https://precisionrifleblog.com/2013/07/20/mil-vs-moa-an-objective-comparison/" target="_blank">PrecisionRifleBlog.com</a> website, Cal Zant tackles that question. Analyzing the pros and cons of each, Zant concludes that both systems work well, provided you have compatible click values on your scope. Zant does note that a 1/4 MOA division is &#8220;slightly more precise&#8221; than 1/10th mil, but that&#8217;s really not a big deal: &#8220;Technically, 1/4 MOA clicks provide a little finer adjustments than 1/10 MIL. This difference is very slight&#8230; it only equates to 0.1&#8243; difference in adjustments at 100 yards or 1&#8243; at 1,000 yards[.]&#8221; Zant adds that, in practical terms, both 1/4-MOA clicks and 1/10th-MIL clicks work well in the field: &#8220;Most shooters agree that 1/4 MOA or 1/10 MIL are both right around that sweet spot.&#8221;</p>
<p><center><font size="5"><a href="https://precisionrifleblog.com/2013/07/20/mil-vs-moa-an-objective-comparison/" target="_blank"><strong>READ MIL vs. MOA Cal Zant Article.</strong></a></font></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2023/11/know-your-optics-mil-vs-moa-click-values-explained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do You REALLY Know MilliRadians? Intro to Mils and Mildots</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2023/10/do-you-really-know-milliradians-intro-to-mils-and-mildots/</link>
		<comments>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2023/10/do-you-really-know-milliradians-intro-to-mils-and-mildots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2023 11:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[- Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shooting Skills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Tip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mildot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milliradian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milrad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tactical Scope]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=63399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We first ran this article in 2012, and it was very well received. Since then, many Forum members have requested an explanation of MILS and mildots, so we decided to run this feature again&#8230; 1 Milliradian (Milrad or &#8216;Mil&#8217;) = 1/1000th of a radian &#124; 1 Milliradian = 0.0573 degrees. In this NSSF Video, Ryan [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/Blog/milrange01.jpg" alt="mildot ranging milliradian Milrad"> </p>
<p><i>We first ran this article in 2012, and it was very well received. Since then, many Forum members have requested an explanation of MILS and mildots, so we decided to run this feature again&#8230;</i></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>1 Milliradian (Milrad or &#8216;Mil&#8217;) = 1/1000th of a radian   |  1 Milliradian = 0.0573 degrees.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p><img class="alignright" src="https://accurateshooter.net/Blog/nfmildot01op.png" border="1" alt="Mildot scope reticle" hspace="6" vspace="4" align="right" />In this NSSF Video, Ryan Cleckner, a former Sniper Instructor for the 1st Ranger Battalion, defines the term &#8220;MilliRadian&#8221; (Milrad) and explains how you can use a mildot-type scope to range the distance to your target. It&#8217;s pretty simple, once you understand the angular subtension for the reticle stadia dots/lines. Cleckner also explains how you can use the milrad-based reticle markings in your scope for elevation hold-overs and windage hold-offs.</p>
<p>Even if you normally shoot at known distances, the hold-off capability of milrad-reticle scopes can help you shoot more accurately in rapidly-changing wind conditions. And, when you must engage multiple targets quickly, you can use the reticle&#8217;s mil markings to move quickly from one target distance to another without having to spin your elevation turrets up and down.</p>
<p><iframe width="600" height="350" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/S5AGsHSIsVo" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p><strong>WEB RESOURCES:</strong> If you want to learn more about using Milliradians and Mildot scopes, we suggest the excellent <a href="https://www.targettamers.com/guides/mil-dot-explained/" target="_blank">Mil-dot Explained</a> article from targettamers.com Guide. This covers the basics you need to know, with clear illustrations.</p>
<p><img width="600" src="https://www.targettamers.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Mil-Dot-Measurement-in-Yards-and-Meters.webp" alt="targettamers.com mildot mil milliradian"></p>
<p>Also informative is <a href="http://www.boomershoot.com/general/TruthMilDots.htm" target="_blank">The Truth about Mil Dots</a> by Michael Haugen. Mr. Haugen begins with basic definitions: 360 degrees = 2 x Pi (symbol <font face="cambria" size="3">π</font>) Radians. That means 1 Radian is about 57.3 degrees. 1 Milliradian (Milrad or &#8216;Mil&#8217;) = 1/1000th of a radian. Thus 1 Milliradian = .0573 degrees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2023/10/do-you-really-know-milliradians-intro-to-mils-and-mildots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Range Targets with MIL-Reticle Optics</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2021/12/how-to-range-targets-with-mil-reticle-optics/</link>
		<comments>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2021/12/how-to-range-targets-with-mil-reticle-optics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2021 06:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[- Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shooting Skills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tactical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mil dot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mil Reticle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mildot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milliradian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milrad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scope]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=66218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MIL-system scopes are popular with tactical shooters. One advantage of MIL scopes is that the mil-dot divisions in the reticle can be used to estimate range to a target. If you know the actual size of a target, you can calculate the distance to the target relatively easily with a mil-based ranging reticle. Watch this [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://accurateshooter.net/Blog/milrange03op.png" alt="NRA Video Milrad MIL mil-dot range reticle"></p>
<p>MIL-system scopes are popular with tactical shooters. One advantage of MIL scopes is that the mil-dot divisions in the reticle can be used to estimate range to a target. If you know the actual size of a target, you can calculate the distance to the target relatively easily with a mil-based ranging reticle. Watch this helpful NRA video to see how this is done:</p>
<p><iframe width="600" height="370" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/nid2OLmzDjo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p><b>Milliradian Definition and Yardage Ranging Formula</b><br />
&#8220;MIL&#8221; or &#8220;Milrad&#8221; is short-hand for Milliradian, a unit of angular measurement. The subtension of 1 mil equals 3.6 inches at 100 yards or 36 inches at 1,000 yards. (In metric units, 1 mil equals 10 centimeters at 100 meters or 1 meter at 1,000 meters.) Knowing this subtension and knowing the size of the target (or a reference object near the target) allows the distance to the target to be estimated with considerable accuracy. The formula used to calculate range (in yards) based on MIL measurement is:</p>
<p><center><em>Height of Target in inches (divided by 36) x 1000, divided by the number of mils.</em></center></p>
<p><img src="http://accurateshooter.net/Blog/milrange04.jpg" alt="NRA Video Milrad MIL mil-dot range reticle"></p>
<p>For example, if a 14&#8243; tall target spans 3 mils from top to bottom, the distance is 129.67 yards calculated as follows: 14/36 x 1000 = 389, then divided by 3 = 129.67. You can also use a different conversion to find distance in meters.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Can You Estimate Range with an MOA-Marked Reticle? Yes You Can&#8230;</strong><br />
Reader Josh offers this handy advice: &#8220;It worth noting that the ability to measure range is not unique to mil-based systems. A MIL is just another unit for measuring angles, and any angular measurement will work. Considering that just about everybody knows that 1 MOA is about an inch per hundred yards, similar formulae can be developed for ranging with MOA marks. The advantage with mils is the precise relationship between units — the MOA-inch measurement is imprecise (being off by 0.047&#8243;) — so in principle MILs are a better unit&#8221;.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2021/12/how-to-range-targets-with-mil-reticle-optics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding Milliradians (Mils) and Mil-Dot Scopes</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2020/11/understanding-milliradians-mils-and-mil-dot-scopes/</link>
		<comments>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2020/11/understanding-milliradians-mils-and-mil-dot-scopes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2020 07:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[- Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leupold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mil dot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mil Ranging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milliradian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milrad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nightforce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSSF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Cleckner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We first ran this article in 2012, and it was very well received. Since then, many Forum members have requested an explanation of MILS and mildots, so we decided to run this feature again&#8230; In this NSSF Video, Ryan Cleckner, a former Sniper Instructor for the 1st Ranger Battalion, defines the term &#8220;MilliRadian&#8221; (Milrad) and [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://accurateshooter.net/Blog/milrange01.jpg" alt="mildot ranging milliradian Milrad"> </p>
<p><i>We first ran this article in 2012, and it was very well received. Since then, many Forum members have requested an explanation of MILS and mildots, so we decided to run this feature again&#8230;</i></p>
<p><img class="alignright" src="http://accurateshooter.net/Blog/nfmildot01op.png" border="1" alt="Mildot scope reticle" hspace="6" vspace="4" align="right" />In this NSSF Video, Ryan Cleckner, a former Sniper Instructor for the 1st Ranger Battalion, defines the term &#8220;MilliRadian&#8221; (Milrad) and explains how you can use a mildot-type scope to range the distance to your target. It&#8217;s pretty simple, once you understand the angular subtension for the reticle stadia dots/lines. Cleckner also explains how you can use the milrad-based reticle markings in your scope for elevation hold-overs and windage hold-offs.</p>
<p>Even if you normally shoot at known distances, the hold-off capability of milrad-reticle scopes can help you shoot more accurately in rapidly-changing wind conditions. And, when you must engage multiple targets quickly, you can use the reticle&#8217;s mil markings to move quickly from one target distance to another without having to spin your elevation turrets up and down.</p>
<p><iframe title="YouTube video player" width="600" height="368" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/S5AGsHSIsVo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p><strong>WEB RESOURCES:</strong> If you want to learn more about using Milliradians and Mildot scopes, we suggest the excellent <a href="http://www.mil-dot.com/user-guide" target="_blank">Mil-dot.com User Guide</a>. This covers the basics you need to know, with clear illustrations. Also informative is <a href="http://www.boomershoot.org/general/TruthMilDots.htm" target="new">The Truth about Mil Dots</a> by Michael Haugen. Mr. Haugen begins with basic definitions: 1 radian = 2 PI; 1 Milliradian (Milrad or &#8216;Mil&#8217;) = 1/1000th of a radian; 1 Milliradian = .0573 degrees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2020/11/understanding-milliradians-mils-and-mil-dot-scopes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Optics Expertise: MIL and MOA Terminology Defined</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/11/optics-expertise-mil-and-moa-terminology-defined/</link>
		<comments>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/11/optics-expertise-mil-and-moa-terminology-defined/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 07:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[- Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Tip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bryan Litz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cal Zant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long-Range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mildot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milliradian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minute of Angle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MOA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Visit PrecisionRifleBlog.com for a discussion of MIL vs. MOA. Many guys getting started in long range shooting are confused about what kind of scope they should buy &#8212; specifically whether it should have MIL-based clicks or MOA-based clicks. Before you can make that decision, you need to understand the terminology. This article, with a video [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://precisionrifleblog.com/2013/07/20/mil-vs-moa-an-objective-comparison/" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://accurateshooter.net/Blog/milmoa1402.png" alt="Mil MOA reticle ranging PRS tactical minute angle precision rifle series"></a><br />
<i>Visit <a href="http://precisionrifleblog.com/2013/07/20/mil-vs-moa-an-objective-comparison/" target="_blank">PrecisionRifleBlog.com</a> for a discussion of MIL vs. MOA.</i></p>
<p>Many guys getting started in long range shooting are confused about what kind of scope they should buy &#8212; specifically whether it should have MIL-based clicks or MOA-based clicks. Before you can make that decision, you need to understand the terminology. This article, with a video by Bryan Litz, explains MILS and MOA so you can choose the right type of scope for your intended application.</p>
<p><i>This <a href="http://marchscopes.com/tactical-5-40-x-56-ffp.html" target='_blank'>March-FX 5-40x56mm Tactical FFP</a> scope features 0.05 MIL Clicks.</i><br />
<img src="http://accurateshooter.net/pix/milmoa1602.jpg" alt="Mil MOA reticle ranging PRS tactical minute angle precision rifle series"></p>
<p>You probably know that MOA stands for &#8220;Minute of Angle&#8221; (or more precisely &#8220;minute of arc&#8221;), but could you define the terms &#8220;Milrad&#8221; or &#8220;MIL&#8221;? In his latest video, Bryan Litz of <a href="http://appliedballisticsllc.com" target="_blank">Applied Ballitics</a> explains MOA and MILs (short for &#8220;milliradians&#8221;). Bryan defines those terms and explains how they are used. One MOA is an angular measurement (1/60th of one degree) that subtends 1.047&#8243; at 100 yards. One MIL (i.e. one milliradian) subtends 1/10th meter at 100 meters; that means that 0.1 Mil is one centimeter (1 cm) at 100 meters. Is one angular measurement system better than another? Not necessarily&#8230; Bryan explains that Mildot scopes may be handy for ranging, but scopes with MOA-based clicks work just fine for precision work at known distances. Also because one MOA is almost exactly one inch at 100 yards, the MOA system is convenient for expressing a rifle&#8217;s accuracy. By common parlance, a &#8220;half-MOA&#8221; rifle can shoot groups that are 1/2-inch (or smaller) at 100 yards.</p>
<p><iframe width="600" height="340" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ZKp4YiDdNls" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p><b>What is a &#8220;Minute&#8221; of Angle?</b><br />
When talking about angular degrees, a &#8220;minute&#8221; is simply 1/60th. So a &#8220;Minute of Angle&#8221; is simply 1/60th of one degree of a central angle, measured either up and down (for elevation) or side to side (for windage). At 100 yards, 1 MOA equals 1.047″ on the target. This is often rounded to one inch for simplicity. Say, for example, you click up 1 MOA (four clicks on a 1/4-MOA scope). That is roughly 1 inch at 100 yards, or roughly 4 inches at 400 yards, since the target area measured by an MOA subtension increases with the distance.</p>
<p><img src="http://accurateshooter.net/Blog/onemoaop.png" alt="one MOA minute of angle diagram"></p>
<p><b>MIL vs. MOA for Target Ranging</b><br />
MIL or MOA &#8212; which angular measuring system is better for target ranging (and hold-offs)? In a recent article on his <a href="http://precisionrifleblog.com/2013/07/20/mil-vs-moa-an-objective-comparison/" target="_blank">PrecisionRifleBlog.com</a> website, Cal Zant tackles that question. Analyzing the pros and cons of each, Zant concludes that both systems work well, provided you have compatible click values on your scope. Zant does note that a 1/4 MOA division is &#8220;slightly more precise&#8221; than 1/10th mil, but that&#8217;s really not a big deal: &#8220;Technically, 1/4 MOA clicks provide a little finer adjustments than 1/10 MIL. This difference is very slight&#8230; it only equates to 0.1&#8243; difference in adjustments at 100 yards or 1&#8243; at 1,000 yards[.]&#8221; Zant adds that, in practical terms, both 1/4-MOA clicks and 1/10th-MIL clicks work well in the field: &#8220;Most shooters agree that 1/4 MOA or 1/10 MIL are both right around that sweet spot.&#8221;</p>
<p><center><font size="5"><a href="http://precisionrifleblog.com/2013/07/20/mil-vs-moa-an-objective-comparison/" target="_blank"><strong>READ MIL vs. MOA Cal Zant Article.</strong></a></font></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/11/optics-expertise-mil-and-moa-terminology-defined/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Use Mil-Dot Scope Reticles to Estimate Range</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/01/how-to-use-mil-dot-scope-reticles-to-estimate-range/</link>
		<comments>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/01/how-to-use-mil-dot-scope-reticles-to-estimate-range/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2017 07:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[- Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mil dot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mildot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milliradian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milrad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scope]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=56481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MIL-system scopes are popular with tactical shooters. One advantage of MIL scopes is that the mil-dot divisions in the reticle can be used to estimate range to a target. If you know the actual size of a target, you can calculate the distance to the target relatively easily with a mil-based ranging reticle. Watch this [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://accurateshooter.net/Blog/milrange03op.png" alt="NRA Video Milrad MIL mil-dot range reticle"></p>
<p>MIL-system scopes are popular with tactical shooters. One advantage of MIL scopes is that the mil-dot divisions in the reticle can be used to estimate range to a target. If you know the actual size of a target, you can calculate the distance to the target relatively easily with a mil-based ranging reticle. Watch this helpful NRA video to see how this is done:</p>
<p><iframe width="600" height="370" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/nid2OLmzDjo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<h2><span id="more-56481"></span></h2>
<p><b>Milliradian Definition and Yardage Ranging Formula</b><br />
&#8220;MIL&#8221; or &#8220;Milrad&#8221; is short-hand for Milliradian, a unit of angular measurement. The subtension of 1 mil equals 3.6 inches at 100 yards or 36 inches at 1,000 yards. (In metric units, 1 mil equals 10 centimeters at 100 meters or 1 meter at 1,000 meters.) Knowing this subtension and knowing the size of the target (or a reference object near the target) allows the distance to the target to be estimated with considerable accuracy. The formula used to calculate range (in yards) based on MIL measurement is:</p>
<p><center><em>Height of Target in inches (divided by 36) x 1000, divided by the number of mils.</em></center></p>
<p><img src="http://accurateshooter.net/Blog/milrange04.jpg" alt="NRA Video Milrad MIL mil-dot range reticle"></p>
<p>For example, if a 14&#8243; tall target spans 3 mils from top to bottom, the distance is 129.67 yards calculated as follows: 14/36 x 1000 = 389, then divided by 3 = 129.67. You can also use a different conversion to find distance in meters.</p>
<p><strong>Can You Estimate Range with an MOA-Marked Reticle? Yes You Can&#8230;</strong><br />
Reader Josh offers this handy advice: &#8220;It worth noting that the ability to measure range is not unique to mil-based systems. A MIL is just another unit for measuring angles, and any angular measurement will work. Considering that just about everybody knows that 1 MOA is about an inch per hundred yards, similar formulae can be developed for ranging with MOA marks. The advantage with mils is the precise relationship between units — the MOA-inch measurement is imprecise (being off by 0.047&#8243;) — so in principle MILs are a better unit&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2017/01/how-to-use-mil-dot-scope-reticles-to-estimate-range/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
