<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Daily Bulletin &#187; Range-Finder</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/tag/range-finder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 05:33:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Shooting Range Locator Maps Ranges Around the Country</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/09/shooting-range-locator-maps-ranges-around-the-country/</link>
		<comments>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/09/shooting-range-locator-maps-ranges-around-the-country/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2018 15:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Tip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Avery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desert Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Range Locator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Range Map]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Range-Finder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shooting Range Map]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talladega Marksmanship Park]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=61716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looking for places to shoot &#8212; out to 1000 yards and beyond? Well the folks at]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://deserttech.com/range-locator.php" target="_blank"><img src="http://accurateshooter.net/pix/dtech1800op.png" alt="Desert Tech Range locator mapping tool map"></a></p>
<p>Looking for places to shoot &#8212; out to 1000 yards and beyond? Well the folks at <a href="<a href="https://deserttech.com/" target="_blank">Desert Tech</a> have created a very powerful web-based, <a href="https://deserttech.com/range-locator.php" target="_blank">Range Locator System</a>. Simply type in town name or Zip Code, and the <a href="https://deserttech.com/range-locator.php" target="_blank">Desert Tech Range Locator</a> plots the nearest ranges on a Google Map interface. Use plus/minus controls to zoom in and out. This handy, online mapping tool includes thousands of shooting ranges, with max target distances for each. As <a href="https://www.ssusa.org/articles/2017/6/8/do-you-need-a-place-to-shoot-long-range-rifle/" target="_blank">Shooting Sports USA</a> explains, you can find &#8220;the exact mileage and directions to the range, then call the contact for information about hours and protocol. Pretty simple.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="https://deserttech.com/range-locator.php" target="_blank"><img src="http://accurateshooter.net/pix/dtech1803.jpg" alt="Desert Tech Range locator mapping tool map"></a></p>
<p><img class="alignright" hspace='20' src="http://accurateshooter.net/pix/dtech1804.gif" target="_blank"><b>How to Use Range Locator</b><br />
All ranges are marked with &#8220;ice cream cone&#8221;-shaped markers. Ranges which allow shooting at 500 yards or greater have orange icons. Other ranges limited to shorter distances are marked in blue. When you click on a range icon, the name, address, phone number, and website are displayed. Simply click on the web link to get more info.</p>
<h2><a href="https://deserttech.com/range-locator.php" target="_blank">SEE RANGE LOCATOR HERE &#187;</a></h2>
<p>NOTE: The system works remarkably well. This Range Locator is our first stop when we are looking for a rifle range in another part of the country. The connection with Google Maps makes this database way more user-friendly than other options. In seconds, you can find rifle ranges anywhere in the nation, including those that specialize in Long Range, and Extreme Long Range shooting. If you are traveling to a shooting match, this will also help you get to your destination. Many undeveloped shooting ranges may not show on your GPS or on AAA maps.</p>
<blockquote><p>Are there shortcomings? Yes &#8212; there are some notable omissions. We searched the Phoenix, Arizona area, and for some reason the <a href="https://www.azgfd.com/shooting/basf/" target="_blank">Ben Avery Shooting Facility</a> did not show up. Considering that Ben Avery may be the most important outdoor range West of the Rockies, that&#8217;s troublesome. That just shows the range locator needs some updates. Overall it is still very impressive. See <a href="http://accurateshooter.net/pix/dtech1805.gif" target="_blank">Ben Avery Map Omission</a>.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2018/09/shooting-range-locator-maps-ranges-around-the-country/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PrecisionRifleBlog.com Tests Range-Finding Binoculars</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/11/precisionrifleblog-com-tests-range-finding-binoculars/</link>
		<comments>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/11/precisionrifleblog-com-tests-range-finding-binoculars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2014 17:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hunting/Varminting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Binocular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PrecisionRifleBlog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Range-Finder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vectronix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=55618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year, PrecisionRifleBlog.com published results from the most comprehensive field test of rangefinder binoculars ever conducted. The comparison test included virtually every product then available in the USA. If you are thinking about getting a set of binoculars with range-finding capability, you should definitely read this test. Here we summarize key findings of the test, [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Last year, </em><a href="http://precisionrifleblog.com/" target="_blank">PrecisionRifleBlog.com</a><em> published results from the most comprehensive field test of rangefinder binoculars ever conducted. The comparison test included virtually every product then available in the USA. If you are thinking about getting a set of binoculars with range-finding capability, you should definitely read this test. Here we summarize key findings of the test, but you&#8217;ll want to read the</em> <a href="http://precisionrifleblog.com/2013/12/03/rangefinder-binoculars-reviews-field-tests-overall-results-summary/" style="text-decoration: underline;">FULL STORY</a>.</p>
<p>Six range-finding binocular optics (and two monocular rangefinders) were field-tested in a variety scenarios to see which had the best performance in terms of both optical clarity and ranging capabilities. <strong>The results are based on over <em>10,000 data points</em> collected from the field over <em>3 months of testing</em>.</strong> Cal Zant, author of PrecisionRifleBlog.com, published a <strong><a href="http://precisionrifleblog.com/2013/12/03/rangefinder-binoculars-reviews-field-tests-overall-results-summary/" style="text-decoration: underline;">series of posts with exhaustive details</a></strong> about his optical and ranging tests and results, but we’ll hit the highlights here.</p>
<p><a href="http://precisionrifleblog.com/2013/12/03/rangefinder-binoculars-reviews-field-tests-overall-results-summary/" target="_blank"><img alt="Ranging Binocular Field Test and Reviews" src="http://precisionrifle.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/ranging-binocular-field-test-and-reviews.jpg" width="600" /></a></p>
<table border="1" width="600" cellpadding="4">
<tr bgcolor="#ffeb9c">
<td><div class="sc_player_container1"><input type="button" id="btnplay_69d3fbfd3e2b42.03160991" class="myButton_play" onClick="play_mp3('play','69d3fbfd3e2b42.03160991','http://accurateshooter.net/Video/calzanttalks1.mp3','80','false');show_hide('play','69d3fbfd3e2b42.03160991');" /><input type="button"  id="btnstop_69d3fbfd3e2b42.03160991" style="display:none" class="myButton_stop" onClick="play_mp3('stop','69d3fbfd3e2b42.03160991','','80','false');show_hide('stop','69d3fbfd3e2b42.03160991');" /><div id="sm2-container"><!-- flash movie ends up here --></div></div></td>
<td><center><b>VOICE FILE: Click Button to Hear Cal Zant TALK about Rangefinder Binocular Test</b></center></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Six of the models tested were binoculars, and the other two were monoculars. The Leupold monocular was included for reference, because many shooters have a 1,000-yard rangefinder similar to the RX-1000. The Vectronix Terrapin model was included as the control for ranging performance, because it is known to be an <em>extremely</em> accurate rangefinder (spoiler alert: it is). Cal provides <strong><a href="http://precisionrifleblog.com/2013/11/11/rangefinder-binoculars-reviews-field-tests-the-models-specs/" style="text-decoration: underline;">a very detailed side-by-side spec comparison</a></strong> for these models in one of his posts.</p>
<h2>Ranging Test Results</h2>
<p><a href="http://precisionrifleblog.com/2013/11/25/rangefinder-binoculars-reviews-field-tests-ranging-performance-results/"><img style="float:right; margin-left:5px;" alt="Rangefinder Binocular Review" src="http://precisionrifle.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/rangefinder-binocular-review.jpg?w=236" width="189" height="240" /></a>Each model was used to range 500+ times in a variety of scenarios from 25 to over 30,000 yards. The tests showed these models had similar performance at close and mid-range targets, but at 600 yards their performance started to diverge … so that is where most of the testing was focused.</p>
<p>The chart below summarizes the ranging performance found on the test targets in ideal conditions, which was from a sturdy tripod, at sunset, with 10+ mile visibility. The exact target shape and surroundings varied, but the targets were all approximately 2 MOA wide, highly reflective, and perpendicular to the rangefinder. Specifics on target dimensions, view from the ranging position, and target surroundings are given in <strong><a href="http://precisionrifleblog.com/2013/11/25/rangefinder-binoculars-reviews-field-tests-ranging-performance-results/" style="text-decoration: underline;">the detailed ranging performance results post</a></strong>.</p>
<p><a href="http://precisionrifleblog.com/2013/11/25/rangefinder-binoculars-reviews-field-tests-ranging-performance-results/"><img  border="1"  alt="Rangefinder Binoculars Review Ranging Performance Under Ideal Light Conditions" src="http://precisionrifle.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/rangefinder-binoculars-review-ranging-performance-under-ideal-light-conditions.png" width="600" /></a></p>
<p>Vectronix is the leader of the rangefinder world, and that was proved once again in these tests. The new Leica Geovid HD-B wasn’t far behind them, with accurate ranging beyond 1 mile. The Zeiss Victory RF also had surgical precision off a tripod, although it had a reduced range compared to the Vectronix and Leica. The Bushnell Fusion 1 Mile also proved to be able to range targets out to their claimed max range of 1,760 yards.</p>
<p><strong>PrecisionRifleBlog.com also tested the ranging performance of each model in bright lighting conditions, and offhand as well.</strong> The data from those tests also contained a few surprises. To determine how accurate each model really was, Cal Zant carefully analyzed the results from each model when aimed at precisely positioned, &#8220;known distance&#8221; targets. To see how those tests turned out, or learn more details about specific models, <a href="http://precisionrifleblog.com/2013/12/03/rangefinder-binoculars-reviews-field-tests-overall-results-summary/" target="_blank"><strong>GO TO full results</strong></a>.</p>
<h2>Optical Test Results</h2>
<p><a href="http://precisionrifleblog.com/2013/11/17/rangefinder-binoculars-reviews-field-tests-the-optical-performance-results/" target="_blank"><img style="float:right; margin-left:5px;" alt="Rangefinder Binoculars Review Optical Quality" src="http://precisionrifle.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/rangefinder-binoculars-review-optical-quality.jpg?w=300" width="300" height="236" /></a>For the optics tests, Cal’s goal was to find an objective, data-driven approach to testing optical performance. What he came up with was placing eye exam charts from 600 to 1,400 yards with different size letters, and then recording what two different people could accurately read with each model. The data for each unit was summed into a single score so they could be ranked relative to how much detail the testers could make out. More specifics are provided regarding how the test was conducted and how scores were calculated in <strong><a href="http://precisionrifleblog.com/2013/11/17/rangefinder-binoculars-reviews-field-tests-the-optical-performance-results/" style="text-decoration: underline;">the optical performance results post</a></strong>. Here are the results from Cal’s data-driven approach:</p>
<p><a href="http://precisionrifleblog.com/2013/11/17/rangefinder-binoculars-reviews-field-tests-the-optical-performance-results/"><img border="1" alt="Rangefinder Binoculars Review Optical Quality" src="http://precisionrifle.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/rangefinder-binoculars-review-optical-quality.png" width="600" /></a></p>
<p>The Leica Geovid HD-B edged out the other models for the top spot, with its completely new, Perger-Porro prism design. The original Leica Geovid HD, and Zeiss Victory RF also showed great optical clarity.</p>
<h2>The Rest of the Story</h2>
<p>Cal’s full series of posts is very informative. He’s done tons of analysis on the data, and summarizes it in several charts that provide a lot of insight. Cal is also in the process of publishing detailed reviews on each model, including notes he and the other testers compiled for each unit. They used them all &#8212; a lot, so they have a unique perspective on what’s good or bad about each. Find out more at the link below:</p>
<p style="font-size: 1.3em; font-weight:bold;"><a href="http://precisionrifleblog.com/2013/12/03/rangefinder-binoculars-reviews-field-tests-overall-results-summary/" style="text-decoration: underline;">CLICK HERE to Read Full Article with More Info</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2014/11/precisionrifleblog-com-tests-range-finding-binoculars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://accurateshooter.net/Video/calzanttalks1.mp3" length="1612728" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
