<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Daily Bulletin &#187; Barrel Cut</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/tag/barrel-cut/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 18:09:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>How .223 Rem Speed Varies with Barrel Length &#8212; Cut-Down Test</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2026/04/how-223-rem-speed-varies-with-barrel-length-cut-down-test/</link>
		<comments>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2026/04/how-223-rem-speed-varies-with-barrel-length-cut-down-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 11:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bullets, Brass, Ammo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gunsmithing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Tip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.223 Rem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Cut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Length Velocity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cut-Down Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rifleshooter.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=71200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of us own a .223 Rem rifle. Now, thanks to our friends at Rifleshooter.com we can assess exactly how velocity changes with barrel length for this popular cartridge. Rifleshooter.com performed an interesting test, cutting the barrel of a .223 Rem rifle from 26&#8243; all the way down to 16.5&#8243;. The cuts were made in [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target='_blank'><img border="0" src="https://accurateshooter.net/Blog/rifleshooter03.jpg" alt=".223 Rem Cut-Down Test barrel UMC m855"></a></p>
<p>Most of us own a .223 Rem rifle. Now, thanks to our friends at <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank">Rifleshooter.com</a> we can assess exactly how velocity changes with barrel length for this popular cartridge.</p>
<p><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank">Rifleshooter.com</a> performed an interesting test, cutting the barrel of a .223 Rem rifle from 26&#8243; all the way down to 16.5&#8243;. The cuts were made  in one-inch intervals with a rotary saw. At each cut length, velocity was measured with a Magnetospeed chronograph. To make the test even more interesting, four different types of .223 Rem/5.56 ammo were chron&#8217;d at each barrel length. The Rifleshooter.com team that conducts these tests has a full-service gun shop, 782 Custom Gunworks &#8212; visit <a href="https://782guns.com" target="_blank">782guns.com</a>.</p>
<p><center><big><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank"><b>READ RifleShooter.com 5.56/.223 Barrel Cut-Down Test Article &#187;</b></big></a></center></p>
<p><big><b>Test Barrel Lost 25.34 FPS Per Inch (.223 Rem Chambering)</b><br />
How much velocity do you think was lost, on average, for each 1&#8243; reduction in barrel length? The answer may surprise you. The average speed loss of the four types of .223/5.56 ammo, with a 9.5&#8243; shortening of barrel length, was 240.75 fps total (from start to finish). That works out to an <strong>average loss of 25.34 fps per inch</strong>.</big></p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="4">
<tr>
<td>5.56/.223 Barrel Cut-Down Speed Test 26&#8243; to 16.5&#8243;</td>
<td>Start FPS at 26&#8243;</td>
<td>End FPS at 16.5&#8243;</td>
<td>Total Loss</td>
<td>Average Loss Per Inch</td>
</tr>
<tr></td>
<td>UMC .223 55gr</td>
<td>3182*</td>
<td>2968</td>
<td>214</td>
<td>22.5 FPS</tr>
<tr>
<td>Federal M193 55gr</td>
<td>3431</td>
<td>3187</td>
<td>244</td>
<td>25.7 FPS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Win m855 62gr</td>
<td>3280</td>
<td>2992</td>
<td>288</td>
<td>30.3 FPS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Blk Hills .223 68gr</td>
<td>2849</td>
<td>2632</td>
<td>217</td>
<td>22.8 FPS</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><i>*There may have been an error. The 25&#8243; velocity was higher at 3221 fps.</i></p>
<p><center><br />
<h2><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target='_blank'>See inch-by-inch Barrel Cut-Down Velocity Data HERE &#187;</a></h2>
<p><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/pix/cutdown223chart.png" alt=".223 Rem Cut-Down Test barrel rifleshooter.com 5.56 nato m855"></a></center></p>
<p>Rifleshooter.com observed: &#8220;Cutting the barrel from 26&#8243; to 16.5&#8243; resulted in a velocity reduction of 214 ft/sec with the UMC 223 55-grain cartridge, 244 ft/sec with the Federal M-193 cartridge, 288 ft/sec with the Winchester M855 cartridge and 217 ft/sec with the Back Hills 223 68-grain match cartridge.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p><b>How the Test Was Done</b><br />
The testers described their procedure as follows: &#8220;Ballistic data was gathered using a Magnetospeed barrel-mounted ballistic chronograph. At each barrel length, the rifle was fired from a front rest with rear bags, with five rounds of each type of ammunition. Average velocity and standard deviation were logged for each round. Once data was gathered for each cartridge at a given barrel length, the rifle was cleared and the bolt was removed. The barrel was cut off using a cold saw. The test protocol was repeated for the next length. Temperature was 45.7&deg; F.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank"><strong>CLICK HERE to Read the Rifleshooter.com Test</strong></a>. This includes detailed charts with inch-by-inch velocity numbers.</p></blockquote>
<p><big><b>See More Barrel Cut-Down Tests on Rifleshooter.com</b></big><br />
Rifleshooter.com has performed barrel cut-down tests for many other calibers/chamberings including <a href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/05/6mm-creedmoor-how-many-fps-will-a-shorter-barrel-cost-you/" target="_blank">6mm Creedmoor</a>, <a href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/01/rifleshooter-com-308-win-barrel-cut-down-velocity-test/" target="_blank">.308 Winchester</a>, and <a href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/08/cutting-338-lm-barrel-from-30-to-17-velocity-loss-revealed/" target="_blank">.338 Lapua Magnum</a>. See these test results at <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/" target="_blank">Rifleshooter.com</a>.</p>
<p><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/Blog/308cut04.jpg" alt=".308 Win barrel length cut test"></p>
<p><b>Much Different Results with 6mmBR and a Longer Barrel</b><br />
The results from Rifleshooter.com&#8217;s .223/5.56 test are quite different than the results we recorded some years ago with a barrel chambered for the 6mmBR cartridge. When we cut our 6mmBR barrel down from 33&#8243; to 28&#8243; we only lost about <strong>8 FPS per inch</strong>. Obviously this is a different cartridge type, but also our 6mmBR barrel end length was longer than Rifleshooter.com&#8217;s .223 Rem start length. Velocity loss may be more extreme with shorter barrel lengths. And, of course, different cartridge types and powder/bullet combinations will yield different results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2026/04/how-223-rem-speed-varies-with-barrel-length-cut-down-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Velocity Per Inch in .223 Rem &#8212; Barrel Cut-Down Test Results</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2023/01/velocity-per-inch-in-223-rem-barrel-cut-down-test-results/</link>
		<comments>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2023/01/velocity-per-inch-in-223-rem-barrel-cut-down-test-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2023 06:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bullets, Brass, Ammo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gunsmithing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Tip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.223 Rem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Cut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Length Velocity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cut-Down Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rifleshooter.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=67813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of us own a .223 Rem rifle. Now, thanks to our friends at Rifleshooter.com we can assess exactly how velocity changes with barrel length for this popular cartridge. Rifleshooter.com performed an interesting test, cutting the barrel of a .223 Rem rifle from 26&#8243; all the way down to 16.5&#8243;. The cuts were made in [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target='_blank'><img border="0" src="http://accurateshooter.net/Blog/rifleshooter03.jpg" alt=".223 Rem Cut-Down Test barrel UMC m855"></a></p>
<p>Most of us own a .223 Rem rifle. Now, thanks to our friends at <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank">Rifleshooter.com</a> we can assess exactly how velocity changes with barrel length for this popular cartridge.</p>
<p><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank">Rifleshooter.com</a> performed an interesting test, cutting the barrel of a .223 Rem rifle from 26&#8243; all the way down to 16.5&#8243;. The cuts were made  in one-inch intervals with a rotary saw. At each cut length, velocity was measured with a Magnetospeed chronograph. To make the test even more interesting, four different types of .223 Rem/5.56 ammo were chron&#8217;d at each barrel length. The Rifleshooter.com team that conducts these tests has a full-service gun shop, 782 Custom Gunworks &#8212; visit <a href="https://782guns.com" target="_blank">782guns.com</a>.</p>
<p><center><big><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank"><b>READ RifleShooter.com 5.56/.223 Barrel Cut-Down Test Article &#187;</b></big></a></center></p>
<p><big><b>Test Barrel Lost 25.34 FPS Per Inch (.223 Rem Chambering)</b><br />
How much velocity do you think was lost, on average, for each 1&#8243; reduction in barrel length? The answer may surprise you. The average speed loss of the four types of .223/5.56 ammo, with a 9.5&#8243; shortening of barrel length, was 240.75 fps total (from start to finish). That works out to an <strong>average loss of 25.34 fps per inch</strong>.</big></p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="4">
<tr>
<td>5.56/.223 Barrel Cut-Down Speed Test 26&#8243; to 16.5&#8243;</td>
<td>Start FPS at 26&#8243;</td>
<td>End FPS at 16.5&#8243;</td>
<td>Total Loss</td>
<td>Average Loss Per Inch</td>
</tr>
<tr></td>
<td>UMC .223 55gr</td>
<td>3182*</td>
<td>2968</td>
<td>214</td>
<td>22.5 FPS</tr>
<tr>
<td>Federal M193 55gr</td>
<td>3431</td>
<td>3187</td>
<td>244</td>
<td>25.7 FPS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Win m855 62gr</td>
<td>3280</td>
<td>2992</td>
<td>288</td>
<td>30.3 FPS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Blk Hills .223 68gr</td>
<td>2849</td>
<td>2632</td>
<td>217</td>
<td>22.8 FPS</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><i>*There may have been an error. The 25&#8243; velocity was higher at 3221 fps.</i></p>
<h2><a href="http://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target='_blank'>See inch-by-inch Barrel Cut-Down Velocity Data HERE &#187;</a></h2>
<p>Rifleshooter.com observed: &#8220;Cutting the barrel from 26″ to 16.5&#8243; resulted in a velocity reduction of 214 ft/sec with the UMC 223 55-grain cartridge, 244 ft/sec with the Federal M-193 cartridge, 288 ft/sec with the Winchester M855 cartridge and 217 ft/sec with the Back Hills 223 68-grain match cartridge.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p><b>How the Test Was Done</b><br />
The testers described their procedure as follows: &#8220;Ballistic data was gathered using a Magnetospeed barrel-mounted ballistic chronograph. At each barrel length, the rifle was fired from a front rest with rear bags, with five rounds of each type of ammunition. Average velocity and standard deviation were logged for each round. Once data was gathered for each cartridge at a given barrel length, the rifle was cleared and the bolt was removed. The barrel was cut off using a cold saw. The test protocol was repeated for the next length. Temperature was 45.7&deg; F.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank"><strong>CLICK HERE to Read the Rifleshooter.com Test</strong></a>. This includes detailed charts with inch-by-inch velocity numbers.</p></blockquote>
<p><big><b>See More Barrel Cut-Down Tests on Rifleshooter.com</b></big><br />
Rifleshooter.com has performed barrel cut-down tests for many other calibers/chamberings including <a href="http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/05/6mm-creedmoor-how-many-fps-will-a-shorter-barrel-cost-you/" target="_blank">6mm Creedmoor</a>, <a href="http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/01/rifleshooter-com-308-win-barrel-cut-down-velocity-test/" target="_blank">.308 Winchester</a>, and <a href="http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/08/cutting-338-lm-barrel-from-30-to-17-velocity-loss-revealed/" target="_blank">.338 Lapua Magnum</a>. See these test results at <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/" target="_blank">Rifleshooter.com</a>.</p>
<p><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/Blog/308cut04.jpg" alt=".308 Win barrel length cut test"></p>
<p><b>Much Different Results with 6mmBR and a Longer Barrel</b><br />
The results from Rifleshooter.com&#8217;s .223/5.56 test are quite different than the results we recorded some years ago with a barrel chambered for the 6mmBR cartridge. When we cut our 6mmBR barrel down from 33&#8243; to 28&#8243; we only lost about <strong>8 FPS per inch</strong>. Obviously this is a different cartridge type, but also our 6mmBR barrel end length was longer than Rifleshooter.com&#8217;s .223 Rem start length. Velocity loss may be more extreme with shorter barrel lengths. And, of course, different cartridge types and powder/bullet combinations will yield different results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2023/01/velocity-per-inch-in-223-rem-barrel-cut-down-test-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>.223 Rem Velocity by Barrel Length &#8212; Cut-Down Test Results</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2022/02/223-rem-velocity-by-barrel-length-cut-down-test-results/</link>
		<comments>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2022/02/223-rem-velocity-by-barrel-length-cut-down-test-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[- Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gunsmithing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Tip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.223 Rem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Cut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Length Velocity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cut-Down Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rifleshooter.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=67177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of us own a .223 Rem rifle. Now, thanks to our friends at Rifleshooter.com we can assess exactly how velocity changes with barrel length for this popular cartridge. Rifleshooter.com performed an interesting test, cutting the barrel of a .223 Rem rifle from 26&#8243; all the way down to 16.5&#8243;. The cuts were made in [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target='_blank'><img border="0" src="http://accurateshooter.net/Blog/rifleshooter03.jpg" alt=".223 Rem Cut-Down Test barrel UMC m855"></a></p>
<p>Most of us own a .223 Rem rifle. Now, thanks to our friends at <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank">Rifleshooter.com</a> we can assess exactly how velocity changes with barrel length for this popular cartridge.</p>
<p><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank">Rifleshooter.com</a> performed an interesting test, cutting the barrel of a .223 Rem rifle from 26&#8243; all the way down to 16.5&#8243;. The cuts were made  in one-inch intervals with a rotary saw. At each cut length, velocity was measured with a Magnetospeed chronograph. To make the test even more interesting, four different types of .223 Rem/5.56 ammo were chron&#8217;d at each barrel length. The Rifleshooter.com team that conducts these tests has a full-service gun shop, 782 Custom Gunworks &#8212; visit <a href="https://782guns.com" target="_blank">782guns.com</a>.</p>
<p><center><big><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank"><b>READ RifleShooter.com 5.56/.223 Barrel Cut-Down Test Article &#187;</b></big></a></center></p>
<p><big><b>Test Barrel Lost 25.34 FPS Per Inch (.223 Rem Chambering)</b><br />
How much velocity do you think was lost, on average, for each 1&#8243; reduction in barrel length? The answer may surprise you. The average speed loss of the four types of .223/5.56 ammo, with a 9.5&#8243; shortening of barrel length, was 240.75 fps total (from start to finish). That works out to an <strong>average loss of 25.34 fps per inch</strong>.</big></p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="4">
<tr>
<td>5.56/.223 Barrel Cut-Down Speed Test 26&#8243; to 16.5&#8243;</td>
<td>Start FPS at 26&#8243;</td>
<td>End FPS at 16.5&#8243;</td>
<td>Total Loss</td>
<td>Average Loss Per Inch</td>
</tr>
<tr></td>
<td>UMC .223 55gr</td>
<td>3182*</td>
<td>2968</td>
<td>214</td>
<td>22.5 FPS</tr>
<tr>
<td>Federal M193 55gr</td>
<td>3431</td>
<td>3187</td>
<td>244</td>
<td>25.7 FPS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Win m855 62gr</td>
<td>3280</td>
<td>2992</td>
<td>288</td>
<td>30.3 FPS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Blk Hills .223 68gr</td>
<td>2849</td>
<td>2632</td>
<td>217</td>
<td>22.8 FPS</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><i>*There may have been an error. The 25&#8243; velocity was higher at 3221 fps.</i></p>
<h2><a href="http://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target='_blank'>See inch-by-inch Barrel Cut-Down Velocity Data HERE &#187;</a></h2>
<p>Rifleshooter.com observed: &#8220;Cutting the barrel from 26″ to 16.5&#8243; resulted in a velocity reduction of 214 ft/sec with the UMC 223 55-grain cartridge, 244 ft/sec with the Federal M-193 cartridge, 288 ft/sec with the Winchester M855 cartridge and 217 ft/sec with the Back Hills 223 68-grain match cartridge.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p><b>How the Test Was Done</b><br />
The testers described their procedure as follows: &#8220;Ballistic data was gathered using a Magnetospeed barrel-mounted ballistic chronograph. At each barrel length, the rifle was fired from a front rest with rear bags, with five rounds of each type of ammunition. Average velocity and standard deviation were logged for each round. Once data was gathered for each cartridge at a given barrel length, the rifle was cleared and the bolt was removed. The barrel was cut off using a cold saw. The test protocol was repeated for the next length. Temperature was 45.7&deg; F.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank"><strong>CLICK HERE to Read the Rifleshooter.com Test</strong></a>. This includes detailed charts with inch-by-inch velocity numbers.</p></blockquote>
<p><b>See More Barrel Cut-Down Tests on Rifleshooter.com</b><br />
Rifleshooter.com has performed barrel cut-down tests for many other calibers/chamberings including <a href="http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/05/6mm-creedmoor-how-many-fps-will-a-shorter-barrel-cost-you/" target="_blank">6mm Creedmoor</a>, <a href="http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/01/rifleshooter-com-308-win-barrel-cut-down-velocity-test/" target="_blank">.308 Winchester</a>, and <a href="http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/08/cutting-338-lm-barrel-from-30-to-17-velocity-loss-revealed/" target="_blank">.338 Lapua Magnum</a>. See these test results at <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/" target="_blank">Rifleshooter.com</a>.</p>
<p><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/Blog/308cut04.jpg" alt=".308 Win barrel length cut test"></p>
<p><b>Much Different Results with 6mmBR and a Longer Barrel</b><br />
The results from Rifleshooter.com&#8217;s .223/5.56 test are quite different than the results we recorded some years ago with a barrel chambered for the 6mmBR cartridge. When we cut our 6mmBR barrel down from 33&#8243; to 28&#8243; we only lost about <strong>8 FPS per inch</strong>. Obviously this is a different cartridge type, but also our 6mmBR barrel end length was longer than Rifleshooter.com&#8217;s .223 Rem start length. Velocity loss may be more extreme with shorter barrel lengths. And, of course, different cartridge types and powder/bullet combinations will yield different results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2022/02/223-rem-velocity-by-barrel-length-cut-down-test-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>.223 Rem Velocity Per Inch Revealed by Barrel Cut-Down Test</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2021/04/223-rem-velocity-per-inch-revealed-by-barrel-cut-down-test/</link>
		<comments>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2021/04/223-rem-velocity-per-inch-revealed-by-barrel-cut-down-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2021 05:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[- Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gunsmithing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Tip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.223 Rem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Cut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Length Velocity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cut-Down Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rifleshooter.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=65764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of us own a .223 Rem rifle. Now, thanks to our friends at Rifleshooter.com we can assess exactly how velocity changes with barrel length for this popular cartridge. Rifleshooter.com performed an interesting test, cutting the barrel of a .223 Rem rifle from 26&#8243; all the way down to 16.5&#8243;. The cuts were made in [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target='_blank'><img border="0" src="http://accurateshooter.net/Blog/rifleshooter03.jpg" alt=".223 Rem Cut-Down Test barrel UMC m855"></a></p>
<p>Most of us own a .223 Rem rifle. Now, thanks to our friends at <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank">Rifleshooter.com</a> we can assess exactly how velocity changes with barrel length for this popular cartridge.</p>
<p><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank">Rifleshooter.com</a> performed an interesting test, cutting the barrel of a .223 Rem rifle from 26&#8243; all the way down to 16.5&#8243;. The cuts were made  in one-inch intervals with a rotary saw. At each cut length, velocity was measured with a Magnetospeed chronograph. To make the test even more interesting, four different types of .223 Rem/5.56 ammo were chron&#8217;d at each barrel length. The Rifleshooter.com team that conducts these tests has a full-service gun shop, 782 Custom Gunworks &#8212; visit <a href="https://782guns.com" target="_blank">782guns.com</a>.</p>
<p><center><big><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank"><b>READ RifleShooter.com 5.56/.223 Barrel Cut-Down Test Article &#187;</b></big></a></center></p>
<p><big><b>Test Barrel Lost 25.34 FPS Per Inch (.223 Rem Chambering)</b><br />
How much velocity do you think was lost, on average, for each 1&#8243; reduction in barrel length? The answer may surprise you. The average speed loss of the four types of .223/5.56 ammo, with a 9.5&#8243; shortening of barrel length, was 240.75 fps total (from start to finish). That works out to an <strong>average loss of 25.34 fps per inch</strong>.</big></p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="4">
<tr>
<td>5.56/.223 Barrel Cut-Down Speed Test 26&#8243; to 16.5&#8243;</td>
<td>Start FPS at 26&#8243;</td>
<td>End FPS at 16.5&#8243;</td>
<td>Total Loss</td>
<td>Average Loss Per Inch</td>
</tr>
<tr></td>
<td>UMC .223 55gr</td>
<td>3182*</td>
<td>2968</td>
<td>214</td>
<td>22.5 FPS</tr>
<tr>
<td>Federal M193 55gr</td>
<td>3431</td>
<td>3187</td>
<td>244</td>
<td>25.7 FPS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Win m855 62gr</td>
<td>3280</td>
<td>2992</td>
<td>288</td>
<td>30.3 FPS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Blk Hills .223 68gr</td>
<td>2849</td>
<td>2632</td>
<td>217</td>
<td>22.8 FPS</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><i>*There may have been an error. The 25&#8243; velocity was higher at 3221 fps.</i></p>
<h2><a href="http://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target='_blank'>See inch-by-inch Barrel Cut-Down Velocity Data HERE &#187;</a></h2>
<p>Rifleshooter.com observed: &#8220;Cutting the barrel from 26″ to 16.5&#8243; resulted in a velocity reduction of 214 ft/sec with the UMC 223 55-grain cartridge, 244 ft/sec with the Federal M-193 cartridge, 288 ft/sec with the Winchester M855 cartridge and 217 ft/sec with the Back Hills 223 68-grain match cartridge.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p><b>How the Test Was Done</b><br />
The testers described their procedure as follows: &#8220;Ballistic data was gathered using a Magnetospeed barrel-mounted ballistic chronograph. At each barrel length, the rifle was fired from a front rest with rear bags, with five rounds of each type of ammunition. Average velocity and standard deviation were logged for each round. Once data was gathered for each cartridge at a given barrel length, the rifle was cleared and the bolt was removed. The barrel was cut off using a cold saw. The test protocol was repeated for the next length. Temperature was 45.7&deg; F.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank"><strong>CLICK HERE to Read the Rifleshooter.com Test</strong></a>. This includes detailed charts with inch-by-inch velocity numbers.</p></blockquote>
<p><b>See More Barrel Cut-Down Tests on Rifleshooter.com</b><br />
Rifleshooter.com has performed barrel cut-down tests for many other calibers/chamberings including <a href="http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/05/6mm-creedmoor-how-many-fps-will-a-shorter-barrel-cost-you/" target="_blank">6mm Creedmoor</a>, <a href="http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/01/rifleshooter-com-308-win-barrel-cut-down-velocity-test/" target="_blank">.308 Winchester</a>, and <a href="http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/08/cutting-338-lm-barrel-from-30-to-17-velocity-loss-revealed/" target="_blank">.338 Lapua Magnum</a>. See these test results at <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/" target="_blank">Rifleshooter.com</a>.</p>
<p><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/Blog/308cut04.jpg" alt=".308 Win barrel length cut test"></p>
<p><b>Much Different Results with 6mmBR and a Longer Barrel</b><br />
The results from Rifleshooter.com&#8217;s .223/5.56 test are quite different than the results we recorded some years ago with a barrel chambered for the 6mmBR cartridge. When we cut our 6mmBR barrel down from 33&#8243; to 28&#8243; we only lost about <strong>8 FPS per inch</strong>. Obviously this is a different cartridge type, but also our 6mmBR barrel end length was longer than Rifleshooter.com&#8217;s .223 Rem start length. Velocity loss may be more extreme with shorter barrel lengths. And, of course, different cartridge types and powder/bullet combinations will yield different results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2021/04/223-rem-velocity-per-inch-revealed-by-barrel-cut-down-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>.223 Rem Barrel Cut-Down Test &#8212; Velocity Loss by the Inch</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/10/how-velocity-changes-with-barrel-length-223-rem-test-results/</link>
		<comments>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/10/how-velocity-changes-with-barrel-length-223-rem-test-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2019 09:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gunsmithing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reloading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.223 Rem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Cut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cut-Down Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rifleshooter.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=58492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of us own a .223 Rem rifle. Now, thanks to our friends at Rifleshooter.com we can assess exactly how velocity changes with barrel length for this popular cartridge. Rifleshooter.com performed an interesting test, cutting the barrel of a .223 Rem rifle from 26&#8243; all the way down to 16.5&#8243;. The cuts were made in [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target='_blank'><img border="0" src="http://accurateshooter.net/Blog/rifleshooter03.jpg" alt=".223 Rem Cut-Down Test barrel UMC m855"></a></p>
<p>Most of us own a .223 Rem rifle. Now, thanks to our friends at <a href="http://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank">Rifleshooter.com</a> we can assess exactly how velocity changes with barrel length for this popular cartridge.</p>
<p><a href="http://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank">Rifleshooter.com</a> performed an interesting test, cutting the barrel of a .223 Rem rifle from 26&#8243; all the way down to 16.5&#8243;. The cuts were made  in one-inch intervals with a rotary saw. At each cut length, velocity was measured with a Magnetospeed chronograph. To make the test even more interesting, four different types of .223 Rem/5.56 ammo were chron&#8217;d at each barrel length. The Rifleshooter.com team that conducts these tests has a full-service gun shop, 782 Custom Gunworks &#8212; visit <a href="https://782guns.com" target="_blank">782guns.com</a>.</p>
<p><center><a href="http://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank"><b>READ RifleShooter.com 5.56/.223 Barrel Cut-Down Test Article.</b></a></center></p>
<p><big><b>Test Barrel Lost 25.34 FPS Per Inch (.223 Rem Chambering)</b><br />
How much velocity do you think was lost, on average, for each 1&#8243; reduction in barrel length? The answer may surprise you. The average speed loss of the four types of .223/5.56 ammo, with a 9.5&#8243; shortening of barrel length, was 240.75 fps total (from start to finish). That works out to an <strong>average loss of 25.34 fps per inch</strong>.</big></p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="4">
<tr>
<td>5.56/.223 Barrel Cut-Down Speed Test 26&#8243; to 16.5&#8243;</td>
<td>Start FPS at 26&#8243;</td>
<td>End FPS at 16.5&#8243;</td>
<td>Total Loss</td>
<td>Average Loss Per Inch</td>
</tr>
<tr></td>
<td>UMC .223 55gr</td>
<td>3182*</td>
<td>2968</td>
<td>214</td>
<td>22.5 FPS</tr>
<tr>
<td>Federal M193 55gr</td>
<td>3431</td>
<td>3187</td>
<td>244</td>
<td>25.7 FPS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Win m855 62gr</td>
<td>3280</td>
<td>2992</td>
<td>288</td>
<td>30.3 FPS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Blk Hills .223 68gr</td>
<td>2849</td>
<td>2632</td>
<td>217</td>
<td>22.8 FPS</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><i>*There may have been an error. The 25&#8243; velocity was higher at 3221 fps.</i></p>
<h2><a href="http://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target='_blank'>See inch-by-inch Barrel Cut-Down Velocity data HERE.</a></h2>
<p>Rifleshooter.com observed: &#8220;Cutting the barrel from 26″ to 16.5&#8243; resulted in a velocity reduction of 214 ft/sec with the UMC 223 55-grain cartridge, 244 ft/sec with the Federal M-193 cartridge, 288 ft/sec with the Winchester M855 cartridge and 217 ft/sec with the Back Hills 223 68-grain match cartridge.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p><b>How the Test Was Done</b><br />
The testers described their procedure as follows: &#8220;Ballistic data was gathered using a Magnetospeed barrel-mounted ballistic chronograph. At each barrel length, the rifle was fired from a front rest with rear bags, with five rounds of each type of ammunition. Average velocity and standard deviation were logged for each round. Once data was gathered for each cartridge at a given barrel length, the rifle was cleared and the bolt was removed. The barrel was cut off using a cold saw. The test protocol was repeated for the next length. Temperature was 45.7&deg; F.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank"><strong>CLICK HERE to Read the Rifleshooter.com Test</strong></a>. This includes detailed charts with inch-by-inch velocity numbers.</p></blockquote>
<p><b>See More Barrel Cut-Down Tests on Rifleshooter.com</b><br />
Rifleshooter.com has performed barrel cut-down tests for many other calibers/chamberings including <a href="http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/05/6mm-creedmoor-how-many-fps-will-a-shorter-barrel-cost-you/" target="_blank">6mm Creedmoor</a>, <a href="http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/01/rifleshooter-com-308-win-barrel-cut-down-velocity-test/" target="_blank">.308 Winchester</a>, and <a href="http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/08/cutting-338-lm-barrel-from-30-to-17-velocity-loss-revealed/" target="_blank">.338 Lapua Magnum</a>. See these test results at <a href="http://rifleshooter.com/" target="_blank">Rifleshooter.com</a>.</p>
<p><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/Blog/308cut04.jpg" alt=".308 Win barrel length cut test"></p>
<p><b>Much Different Results with 6mmBR and a Longer Barrel</b><br />
The results from Rifleshooter.com&#8217;s .223/5.56 test are quite different than the results we recorded some years ago with a barrel chambered for the 6mmBR cartridge. When we cut our 6mmBR barrel down from 33&#8243; to 28&#8243; we only lost about <strong>8 FPS per inch</strong>. Obviously this is a different cartridge type, but also our 6mmBR barrel end length was longer than Rifleshooter.com&#8217;s .223 Rem start length. Velocity loss may be more extreme with shorter barrel lengths. And, of course, different cartridge types and powder/bullet combinations will yield different results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/10/how-velocity-changes-with-barrel-length-223-rem-test-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
