<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Daily Bulletin &#187; Barrel Length Velocity</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/tag/barrel-length-velocity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com</link>
	<description>from AccurateShooter.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 12:29:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.26</generator>
	<item>
		<title>How .223 Rem Speed Varies with Barrel Length &#8212; Cut-Down Test</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2026/04/how-223-rem-speed-varies-with-barrel-length-cut-down-test/</link>
		<comments>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2026/04/how-223-rem-speed-varies-with-barrel-length-cut-down-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 11:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bullets, Brass, Ammo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gunsmithing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Tip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.223 Rem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Cut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Length Velocity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cut-Down Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rifleshooter.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=71200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of us own a .223 Rem rifle. Now, thanks to our friends at Rifleshooter.com we can assess exactly how velocity changes with barrel length for this popular cartridge. Rifleshooter.com performed an interesting test, cutting the barrel of a .223 Rem rifle from 26&#8243; all the way down to 16.5&#8243;. The cuts were made in [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target='_blank'><img border="0" src="https://accurateshooter.net/Blog/rifleshooter03.jpg" alt=".223 Rem Cut-Down Test barrel UMC m855"></a></p>
<p>Most of us own a .223 Rem rifle. Now, thanks to our friends at <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank">Rifleshooter.com</a> we can assess exactly how velocity changes with barrel length for this popular cartridge.</p>
<p><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank">Rifleshooter.com</a> performed an interesting test, cutting the barrel of a .223 Rem rifle from 26&#8243; all the way down to 16.5&#8243;. The cuts were made  in one-inch intervals with a rotary saw. At each cut length, velocity was measured with a Magnetospeed chronograph. To make the test even more interesting, four different types of .223 Rem/5.56 ammo were chron&#8217;d at each barrel length. The Rifleshooter.com team that conducts these tests has a full-service gun shop, 782 Custom Gunworks &#8212; visit <a href="https://782guns.com" target="_blank">782guns.com</a>.</p>
<p><center><big><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank"><b>READ RifleShooter.com 5.56/.223 Barrel Cut-Down Test Article &#187;</b></big></a></center></p>
<p><big><b>Test Barrel Lost 25.34 FPS Per Inch (.223 Rem Chambering)</b><br />
How much velocity do you think was lost, on average, for each 1&#8243; reduction in barrel length? The answer may surprise you. The average speed loss of the four types of .223/5.56 ammo, with a 9.5&#8243; shortening of barrel length, was 240.75 fps total (from start to finish). That works out to an <strong>average loss of 25.34 fps per inch</strong>.</big></p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="4">
<tr>
<td>5.56/.223 Barrel Cut-Down Speed Test 26&#8243; to 16.5&#8243;</td>
<td>Start FPS at 26&#8243;</td>
<td>End FPS at 16.5&#8243;</td>
<td>Total Loss</td>
<td>Average Loss Per Inch</td>
</tr>
<tr></td>
<td>UMC .223 55gr</td>
<td>3182*</td>
<td>2968</td>
<td>214</td>
<td>22.5 FPS</tr>
<tr>
<td>Federal M193 55gr</td>
<td>3431</td>
<td>3187</td>
<td>244</td>
<td>25.7 FPS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Win m855 62gr</td>
<td>3280</td>
<td>2992</td>
<td>288</td>
<td>30.3 FPS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Blk Hills .223 68gr</td>
<td>2849</td>
<td>2632</td>
<td>217</td>
<td>22.8 FPS</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><i>*There may have been an error. The 25&#8243; velocity was higher at 3221 fps.</i></p>
<p><center><br />
<h2><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target='_blank'>See inch-by-inch Barrel Cut-Down Velocity Data HERE &#187;</a></h2>
<p><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/pix/cutdown223chart.png" alt=".223 Rem Cut-Down Test barrel rifleshooter.com 5.56 nato m855"></a></center></p>
<p>Rifleshooter.com observed: &#8220;Cutting the barrel from 26&#8243; to 16.5&#8243; resulted in a velocity reduction of 214 ft/sec with the UMC 223 55-grain cartridge, 244 ft/sec with the Federal M-193 cartridge, 288 ft/sec with the Winchester M855 cartridge and 217 ft/sec with the Back Hills 223 68-grain match cartridge.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p><b>How the Test Was Done</b><br />
The testers described their procedure as follows: &#8220;Ballistic data was gathered using a Magnetospeed barrel-mounted ballistic chronograph. At each barrel length, the rifle was fired from a front rest with rear bags, with five rounds of each type of ammunition. Average velocity and standard deviation were logged for each round. Once data was gathered for each cartridge at a given barrel length, the rifle was cleared and the bolt was removed. The barrel was cut off using a cold saw. The test protocol was repeated for the next length. Temperature was 45.7&deg; F.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank"><strong>CLICK HERE to Read the Rifleshooter.com Test</strong></a>. This includes detailed charts with inch-by-inch velocity numbers.</p></blockquote>
<p><big><b>See More Barrel Cut-Down Tests on Rifleshooter.com</b></big><br />
Rifleshooter.com has performed barrel cut-down tests for many other calibers/chamberings including <a href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/05/6mm-creedmoor-how-many-fps-will-a-shorter-barrel-cost-you/" target="_blank">6mm Creedmoor</a>, <a href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/01/rifleshooter-com-308-win-barrel-cut-down-velocity-test/" target="_blank">.308 Winchester</a>, and <a href="https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/08/cutting-338-lm-barrel-from-30-to-17-velocity-loss-revealed/" target="_blank">.338 Lapua Magnum</a>. See these test results at <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/" target="_blank">Rifleshooter.com</a>.</p>
<p><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/Blog/308cut04.jpg" alt=".308 Win barrel length cut test"></p>
<p><b>Much Different Results with 6mmBR and a Longer Barrel</b><br />
The results from Rifleshooter.com&#8217;s .223/5.56 test are quite different than the results we recorded some years ago with a barrel chambered for the 6mmBR cartridge. When we cut our 6mmBR barrel down from 33&#8243; to 28&#8243; we only lost about <strong>8 FPS per inch</strong>. Obviously this is a different cartridge type, but also our 6mmBR barrel end length was longer than Rifleshooter.com&#8217;s .223 Rem start length. Velocity loss may be more extreme with shorter barrel lengths. And, of course, different cartridge types and powder/bullet combinations will yield different results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2026/04/how-223-rem-speed-varies-with-barrel-length-cut-down-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6mm Creedmoor — Barrel Cut-Down Test for Velocity (24&#8243;-16&#8243;)</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2025/05/6mm-creedmoor-barrel-cut-down-test-for-velocity-24-16/</link>
		<comments>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2025/05/6mm-creedmoor-barrel-cut-down-test-for-velocity-24-16/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 15:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bullets, Brass, Ammo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gear Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gunsmithing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6CM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6mm Creedmoor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6mm Creedmore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Cut-Down Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Length Velocity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Barr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creedmoor Velocity Test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=71483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A while back, our friend Bill Marr of Rifleshooter.com conducted a fascinating 6mm Creedmoor barrel cut-down test that reveals how velocity changes with barrel length. This time Bill started with a 24&#8243; Proof Research stainless steel barrel on a Howa action. Bill says this was a well-used barrel, with over 1800 rounds through it. So, [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/pix/billcut1900.jpg" alt="6mm 6.5 Creedmoor rifleshooter.com Bill Barr barrel length cut-down velocity test chronograph Magnetospeed chrono"></p>
<p>A while back, our friend Bill Marr of <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/" target="_blank">Rifleshooter.com</a> conducted a fascinating <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2019/05/6-creedmoor-effects-of-barrel-length-on-muzzle-velocity/" target="_blank">6mm Creedmoor barrel cut-down test</a> that reveals how velocity changes with barrel length. This time Bill started with a 24&#8243; Proof Research stainless steel barrel on a Howa action. Bill says this was a well-used barrel, with over 1800 rounds through it. So, the velocities might be a bit different than a new barrel of similar length. Bill cut the barrel down in one-inch increments. Here are some results from the test:</p>
<p><big><strong>24&#8243; Velocity: 2893 FPS | 20&#8243; Velocity: 2755 FPS  | 16.1&#8243; Velocity: 2598 FPS</strong></big></p>
<h2><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2019/05/6-creedmoor-effects-of-barrel-length-on-muzzle-velocity/" target="_blank">CLICK HERE for FULL TEST REPORT on RifleShooter.com &#187;</a></h2>
<p><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/pix/billcut1903.jpg" alt="6mm 6.5 Creedmoor rifleshooter.com Bill Barr barrel length cut-down velocity test chronograph Magnetospeed chrono"></p>
<p><img class="alignright" hspace="10" src="https://accurateshooter.net/pix/billcut1902.jpg" alt="6mm 6.5 Creedmoor rifleshooter.com Bill Barr barrel length cut-down velocity test chronograph Magnetospeed chrono">For this latest test, Rifleshooter cut the barrel in one-inch increments from 24&#8243; to 16.1&#8243; (just over legal minimum). Velocities were measured with a <a href="http://www.avantlink.com/click.php?tt=ale&#038;pw=164303&#038;mi=10077&#038;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.brownells.com%2Fsearch%2Findex.htm%3Fk%3Dmagnetospeed%26ksubmit%3Dy" target="_blank">MagnetoSpeed V3 chronograph</a> mounted on arm attached to the stock. This allowed the chrono to be adjusted inwards as the barrel was cut shorter, inch by inch.</p>
<p>For the 6mm Creedmoor cartridge, Bill loaded <a href="http://www.avantlink.com/click.php?tt=ale&#038;pw=164303&#038;mi=10077&#038;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.brownells.com%2Fsearch%2Findex.htm%3Fk%3Dhornady%2B108%26ksubmit%3Dy" target="_blank">Hornady 108gr ELD Match bullets</a> over 41.5 grains of Hodgdon H4350 with CCI 200 primers in new Starline brass.</p>
<p>The results were interesting to say the least. Bill reports: &#8220;Muzzle velocities ranged from 2,893 ft/sec at 24″ to 2,598 ft/sec at 16″ for a decrease in muzzle velocity of 295 ft/sec. Muzzle velocity changes per inch of barrel length ranged from 6 ft/sec per inch between 20 and 19 inches to 63 ft/sec per inch between 19 and 18 inches. Average velocity change per inch of barrel length was 37.9 ft/sec.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>Bill concludes: &#8220;An average drop of 37.9 ft/sec/inch of barrel is fairly significant and is what would be expected with a fast moving 6mm cartridge like the 6mm Creedmoor. While I’m used to seeing 6mm Creedmoors with slightly longer barrel lengths than 24″, when coupled with a sound suppressor the additional length can make moving the rifle quickly more difficult.</p>
<p>I’d suggest staying with longer barrel lengths wherever possible with this cartridge. At shorter lengths, it does give up more performance than its big brother the 6.5 Creedmoor.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<h2>More 6mm Creedmoor Velocity Data from 2017 Cut-Down Test</h2>
<p>If you&#8217;re curious about 6mm Creedmoor velocities at longer barrel lengths, back in 2017 Rifleshooter completed a <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2017/01/6-creedmoor-barrel-length-versus-muzzle-velocity-31-to-17-inches/" target="_blank">6mm Creedmoor barrel cut-down test</a> from 31 inches all the way down to 17 inches. The test included four bullet types from 95 grains to 110 grains. With the 110gr Sierra MK, velocity at 31&#8243; was an impressive 3110 fps. Surprisingly the velocity didn&#8217;t decrease that much for the first few inches. Even at 26&#8243; (a five-inch reduction), measured velocity with the 110s was 3073 fps, a loss of 7.4 fps per inch on average. With a barrel shortened all the way to 20&#8243; however, velocity had dropped down to 2949 fps, a significant (161 fps) loss. <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2017/01/6-creedmoor-barrel-length-versus-muzzle-velocity-31-to-17-inches/" target="_blank">CLICK HERE</a> for complete results from that <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2017/01/6-creedmoor-barrel-length-versus-muzzle-velocity-31-to-17-inches/" target="_blank">31&#8243;-17&#8243; Barrel Cut-Down Test</a>. </p>
<p><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2017/01/6-creedmoor-barrel-length-versus-muzzle-velocity-31-to-17-inches/" target="_blank"><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/pix/billcut1904logo.jpg" alt="6mm 6.5 Creedmoor rifleshooter.com Bill Barr barrel length cut-down velocity test chronograph Magnetospeed chrono"></a></p>
<p><big><big><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2017/01/6-creedmoor-barrel-length-versus-muzzle-velocity-31-to-17-inches/" target="_blank"><strong>CLICK HERE for 31&#8243; to 17&#8243; 6mm Creedmoor Barrel Test Report &#187;</strong></a></big></big></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2025/05/6mm-creedmoor-barrel-cut-down-test-for-velocity-24-16/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6mm Creedmoor &#8212; How Velocity Changes with Barrel Length</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2023/07/6mm-creedmoor-how-velocity-changes-with-barrel-length/</link>
		<comments>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2023/07/6mm-creedmoor-how-velocity-changes-with-barrel-length/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2023 12:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[- Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[- Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gunsmithing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Tip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6CM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6mm Creedmoor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6mm Creedmore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Cut-Down Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Length Velocity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Barr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creedmoor Velocity Test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=69198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A while back, our friend Bill Marr of Rifleshooter.com conducted a fascinating 6mm Creedmoor barrel cut-down test that reveals how velocity changes with barrel length. This time Bill started with a 24&#8243; Proof Research stainless steel barrel on a Howa action. Bill says this was a well-used barrel, with over 1800 rounds through it. So, [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/pix/billcut1900.jpg" alt="6mm 6.5 Creedmoor rifleshooter.com Bill Barr barrel length cut-down velocity test chronograph Magnetospeed chrono"></p>
<p>A while back, our friend Bill Marr of <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/" target="_blank">Rifleshooter.com</a> conducted a fascinating <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2019/05/6-creedmoor-effects-of-barrel-length-on-muzzle-velocity/" target="_blank">6mm Creedmoor barrel cut-down test</a> that reveals how velocity changes with barrel length. This time Bill started with a 24&#8243; Proof Research stainless steel barrel on a Howa action. Bill says this was a well-used barrel, with over 1800 rounds through it. So, the velocities might be a bit different than a new barrel of similar length. Bill cut the barrel down in one-inch increments. Here are some results from the test:</p>
<p><big><strong>24&#8243; Velocity: 2893 FPS | 20&#8243; Velocity: 2755 FPS  | 16.1&#8243; Velocity: 2598 FPS</strong></big></p>
<h2><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2019/05/6-creedmoor-effects-of-barrel-length-on-muzzle-velocity/" target="_blank">CLICK HERE for FULL TEST REPORT on RifleShooter.com &#187;</a></h2>
<p><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/pix/billcut1903.jpg" alt="6mm 6.5 Creedmoor rifleshooter.com Bill Barr barrel length cut-down velocity test chronograph Magnetospeed chrono"></p>
<p><img class="alignright" hspace="10" src="https://accurateshooter.net/pix/billcut1902.jpg" alt="6mm 6.5 Creedmoor rifleshooter.com Bill Barr barrel length cut-down velocity test chronograph Magnetospeed chrono">For this latest test, Rifleshooter cut the barrel in one-inch increments from 24&#8243; to 16.1&#8243; (just over legal minimum). Velocities were measured with a <a href="http://www.avantlink.com/click.php?tt=ale&#038;pw=164303&#038;mi=10077&#038;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.brownells.com%2Fsearch%2Findex.htm%3Fk%3Dmagnetospeed%26ksubmit%3Dy" target="_blank">MagnetoSpeed V3 chronograph</a> mounted on arm attached to the stock. This allowed the chrono to be adjusted inwards as the barrel was cut shorter, inch by inch.</p>
<p>For the 6mm Creedmoor cartridge, Bill loaded <a href="http://www.avantlink.com/click.php?tt=ale&#038;pw=164303&#038;mi=10077&#038;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.brownells.com%2Fsearch%2Findex.htm%3Fk%3Dhornady%2B108%26ksubmit%3Dy" target="_blank">Hornady 108gr ELD Match bullets</a> over 41.5 grains of Hodgdon H4350 with CCI 200 primers in new Starline brass.</p>
<p>The results were interesting to say the least. Bill reports: &#8220;Muzzle velocities ranged from 2,893 ft/sec at 24″ to 2,598 ft/sec at 16″ for a decrease in muzzle velocity of 295 ft/sec. Muzzle velocity changes per inch of barrel length ranged from 6 ft/sec per inch between 20 and 19 inches to 63 ft/sec per inch between 19 and 18 inches. Average velocity change per inch of barrel length was 37.9 ft/sec.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>Bill concludes: &#8220;An average drop of 37.9 ft/sec/inch of barrel is fairly significant and is what would be expected with a fast moving 6mm cartridge like the 6mm Creedmoor. While I’m used to seeing 6mm Creedmoors with slightly longer barrel lengths than 24″, when coupled with a sound suppressor the additional length can make moving the rifle quickly more difficult.</p>
<p>I’d suggest staying with longer barrel lengths wherever possible with this cartridge. At shorter lengths, it does give up more performance than its big brother the 6.5 Creedmoor.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<h2>More 6mm Creedmoor Velocity Data from 2017 Cut-Down Test</h2>
<p>If you&#8217;re curious about 6mm Creedmoor velocities at longer barrel lengths, back in 2017 Rifleshooter completed a <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2017/01/6-creedmoor-barrel-length-versus-muzzle-velocity-31-to-17-inches/" target="_blank">6mm Creedmoor barrel cut-down test</a> from 31 inches all the way down to 17 inches. The test included four bullet types from 95 grains to 110 grains. With the 110gr Sierra MK, velocity at 31&#8243; was an impressive 3110 fps. Surprisingly the velocity didn&#8217;t decrease that much for the first few inches. Even at 26&#8243; (a five-inch reduction), measured velocity with the 110s was 3073 fps, a loss of 7.4 fps per inch on average. With a barrel shortened all the way to 20&#8243; however, velocity had dropped down to 2949 fps, a significant (161 fps) loss. <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2017/01/6-creedmoor-barrel-length-versus-muzzle-velocity-31-to-17-inches/" target="_blank">CLICK HERE</a> for complete results from that <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2017/01/6-creedmoor-barrel-length-versus-muzzle-velocity-31-to-17-inches/" target="_blank">31&#8243;-17&#8243; Barrel Cut-Down Test</a>. </p>
<p><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2017/01/6-creedmoor-barrel-length-versus-muzzle-velocity-31-to-17-inches/" target="_blank"><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/pix/billcut1904logo.jpg" alt="6mm 6.5 Creedmoor rifleshooter.com Bill Barr barrel length cut-down velocity test chronograph Magnetospeed chrono"></a></p>
<p><big><big><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2017/01/6-creedmoor-barrel-length-versus-muzzle-velocity-31-to-17-inches/" target="_blank"><strong>CLICK HERE for 31&#8243; to 17&#8243; 6mm Creedmoor Barrel Test Report &#187;</strong></a></big></big></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2023/07/6mm-creedmoor-how-velocity-changes-with-barrel-length/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Velocity Per Inch in .223 Rem &#8212; Barrel Cut-Down Test Results</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2023/01/velocity-per-inch-in-223-rem-barrel-cut-down-test-results/</link>
		<comments>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2023/01/velocity-per-inch-in-223-rem-barrel-cut-down-test-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2023 06:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bullets, Brass, Ammo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gunsmithing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Tip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.223 Rem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Cut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Length Velocity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cut-Down Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rifleshooter.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=67813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of us own a .223 Rem rifle. Now, thanks to our friends at Rifleshooter.com we can assess exactly how velocity changes with barrel length for this popular cartridge. Rifleshooter.com performed an interesting test, cutting the barrel of a .223 Rem rifle from 26&#8243; all the way down to 16.5&#8243;. The cuts were made in [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target='_blank'><img border="0" src="http://accurateshooter.net/Blog/rifleshooter03.jpg" alt=".223 Rem Cut-Down Test barrel UMC m855"></a></p>
<p>Most of us own a .223 Rem rifle. Now, thanks to our friends at <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank">Rifleshooter.com</a> we can assess exactly how velocity changes with barrel length for this popular cartridge.</p>
<p><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank">Rifleshooter.com</a> performed an interesting test, cutting the barrel of a .223 Rem rifle from 26&#8243; all the way down to 16.5&#8243;. The cuts were made  in one-inch intervals with a rotary saw. At each cut length, velocity was measured with a Magnetospeed chronograph. To make the test even more interesting, four different types of .223 Rem/5.56 ammo were chron&#8217;d at each barrel length. The Rifleshooter.com team that conducts these tests has a full-service gun shop, 782 Custom Gunworks &#8212; visit <a href="https://782guns.com" target="_blank">782guns.com</a>.</p>
<p><center><big><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank"><b>READ RifleShooter.com 5.56/.223 Barrel Cut-Down Test Article &#187;</b></big></a></center></p>
<p><big><b>Test Barrel Lost 25.34 FPS Per Inch (.223 Rem Chambering)</b><br />
How much velocity do you think was lost, on average, for each 1&#8243; reduction in barrel length? The answer may surprise you. The average speed loss of the four types of .223/5.56 ammo, with a 9.5&#8243; shortening of barrel length, was 240.75 fps total (from start to finish). That works out to an <strong>average loss of 25.34 fps per inch</strong>.</big></p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="4">
<tr>
<td>5.56/.223 Barrel Cut-Down Speed Test 26&#8243; to 16.5&#8243;</td>
<td>Start FPS at 26&#8243;</td>
<td>End FPS at 16.5&#8243;</td>
<td>Total Loss</td>
<td>Average Loss Per Inch</td>
</tr>
<tr></td>
<td>UMC .223 55gr</td>
<td>3182*</td>
<td>2968</td>
<td>214</td>
<td>22.5 FPS</tr>
<tr>
<td>Federal M193 55gr</td>
<td>3431</td>
<td>3187</td>
<td>244</td>
<td>25.7 FPS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Win m855 62gr</td>
<td>3280</td>
<td>2992</td>
<td>288</td>
<td>30.3 FPS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Blk Hills .223 68gr</td>
<td>2849</td>
<td>2632</td>
<td>217</td>
<td>22.8 FPS</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><i>*There may have been an error. The 25&#8243; velocity was higher at 3221 fps.</i></p>
<h2><a href="http://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target='_blank'>See inch-by-inch Barrel Cut-Down Velocity Data HERE &#187;</a></h2>
<p>Rifleshooter.com observed: &#8220;Cutting the barrel from 26″ to 16.5&#8243; resulted in a velocity reduction of 214 ft/sec with the UMC 223 55-grain cartridge, 244 ft/sec with the Federal M-193 cartridge, 288 ft/sec with the Winchester M855 cartridge and 217 ft/sec with the Back Hills 223 68-grain match cartridge.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p><b>How the Test Was Done</b><br />
The testers described their procedure as follows: &#8220;Ballistic data was gathered using a Magnetospeed barrel-mounted ballistic chronograph. At each barrel length, the rifle was fired from a front rest with rear bags, with five rounds of each type of ammunition. Average velocity and standard deviation were logged for each round. Once data was gathered for each cartridge at a given barrel length, the rifle was cleared and the bolt was removed. The barrel was cut off using a cold saw. The test protocol was repeated for the next length. Temperature was 45.7&deg; F.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank"><strong>CLICK HERE to Read the Rifleshooter.com Test</strong></a>. This includes detailed charts with inch-by-inch velocity numbers.</p></blockquote>
<p><big><b>See More Barrel Cut-Down Tests on Rifleshooter.com</b></big><br />
Rifleshooter.com has performed barrel cut-down tests for many other calibers/chamberings including <a href="http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/05/6mm-creedmoor-how-many-fps-will-a-shorter-barrel-cost-you/" target="_blank">6mm Creedmoor</a>, <a href="http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/01/rifleshooter-com-308-win-barrel-cut-down-velocity-test/" target="_blank">.308 Winchester</a>, and <a href="http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/08/cutting-338-lm-barrel-from-30-to-17-velocity-loss-revealed/" target="_blank">.338 Lapua Magnum</a>. See these test results at <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/" target="_blank">Rifleshooter.com</a>.</p>
<p><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/Blog/308cut04.jpg" alt=".308 Win barrel length cut test"></p>
<p><b>Much Different Results with 6mmBR and a Longer Barrel</b><br />
The results from Rifleshooter.com&#8217;s .223/5.56 test are quite different than the results we recorded some years ago with a barrel chambered for the 6mmBR cartridge. When we cut our 6mmBR barrel down from 33&#8243; to 28&#8243; we only lost about <strong>8 FPS per inch</strong>. Obviously this is a different cartridge type, but also our 6mmBR barrel end length was longer than Rifleshooter.com&#8217;s .223 Rem start length. Velocity loss may be more extreme with shorter barrel lengths. And, of course, different cartridge types and powder/bullet combinations will yield different results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2023/01/velocity-per-inch-in-223-rem-barrel-cut-down-test-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>.223 Rem Velocity by Barrel Length &#8212; Cut-Down Test Results</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2022/02/223-rem-velocity-by-barrel-length-cut-down-test-results/</link>
		<comments>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2022/02/223-rem-velocity-by-barrel-length-cut-down-test-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 18:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[- Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gunsmithing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Tip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.223 Rem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Cut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Length Velocity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cut-Down Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rifleshooter.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=67177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of us own a .223 Rem rifle. Now, thanks to our friends at Rifleshooter.com we can assess exactly how velocity changes with barrel length for this popular cartridge. Rifleshooter.com performed an interesting test, cutting the barrel of a .223 Rem rifle from 26&#8243; all the way down to 16.5&#8243;. The cuts were made in [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target='_blank'><img border="0" src="http://accurateshooter.net/Blog/rifleshooter03.jpg" alt=".223 Rem Cut-Down Test barrel UMC m855"></a></p>
<p>Most of us own a .223 Rem rifle. Now, thanks to our friends at <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank">Rifleshooter.com</a> we can assess exactly how velocity changes with barrel length for this popular cartridge.</p>
<p><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank">Rifleshooter.com</a> performed an interesting test, cutting the barrel of a .223 Rem rifle from 26&#8243; all the way down to 16.5&#8243;. The cuts were made  in one-inch intervals with a rotary saw. At each cut length, velocity was measured with a Magnetospeed chronograph. To make the test even more interesting, four different types of .223 Rem/5.56 ammo were chron&#8217;d at each barrel length. The Rifleshooter.com team that conducts these tests has a full-service gun shop, 782 Custom Gunworks &#8212; visit <a href="https://782guns.com" target="_blank">782guns.com</a>.</p>
<p><center><big><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank"><b>READ RifleShooter.com 5.56/.223 Barrel Cut-Down Test Article &#187;</b></big></a></center></p>
<p><big><b>Test Barrel Lost 25.34 FPS Per Inch (.223 Rem Chambering)</b><br />
How much velocity do you think was lost, on average, for each 1&#8243; reduction in barrel length? The answer may surprise you. The average speed loss of the four types of .223/5.56 ammo, with a 9.5&#8243; shortening of barrel length, was 240.75 fps total (from start to finish). That works out to an <strong>average loss of 25.34 fps per inch</strong>.</big></p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="4">
<tr>
<td>5.56/.223 Barrel Cut-Down Speed Test 26&#8243; to 16.5&#8243;</td>
<td>Start FPS at 26&#8243;</td>
<td>End FPS at 16.5&#8243;</td>
<td>Total Loss</td>
<td>Average Loss Per Inch</td>
</tr>
<tr></td>
<td>UMC .223 55gr</td>
<td>3182*</td>
<td>2968</td>
<td>214</td>
<td>22.5 FPS</tr>
<tr>
<td>Federal M193 55gr</td>
<td>3431</td>
<td>3187</td>
<td>244</td>
<td>25.7 FPS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Win m855 62gr</td>
<td>3280</td>
<td>2992</td>
<td>288</td>
<td>30.3 FPS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Blk Hills .223 68gr</td>
<td>2849</td>
<td>2632</td>
<td>217</td>
<td>22.8 FPS</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><i>*There may have been an error. The 25&#8243; velocity was higher at 3221 fps.</i></p>
<h2><a href="http://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target='_blank'>See inch-by-inch Barrel Cut-Down Velocity Data HERE &#187;</a></h2>
<p>Rifleshooter.com observed: &#8220;Cutting the barrel from 26″ to 16.5&#8243; resulted in a velocity reduction of 214 ft/sec with the UMC 223 55-grain cartridge, 244 ft/sec with the Federal M-193 cartridge, 288 ft/sec with the Winchester M855 cartridge and 217 ft/sec with the Back Hills 223 68-grain match cartridge.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p><b>How the Test Was Done</b><br />
The testers described their procedure as follows: &#8220;Ballistic data was gathered using a Magnetospeed barrel-mounted ballistic chronograph. At each barrel length, the rifle was fired from a front rest with rear bags, with five rounds of each type of ammunition. Average velocity and standard deviation were logged for each round. Once data was gathered for each cartridge at a given barrel length, the rifle was cleared and the bolt was removed. The barrel was cut off using a cold saw. The test protocol was repeated for the next length. Temperature was 45.7&deg; F.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank"><strong>CLICK HERE to Read the Rifleshooter.com Test</strong></a>. This includes detailed charts with inch-by-inch velocity numbers.</p></blockquote>
<p><b>See More Barrel Cut-Down Tests on Rifleshooter.com</b><br />
Rifleshooter.com has performed barrel cut-down tests for many other calibers/chamberings including <a href="http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/05/6mm-creedmoor-how-many-fps-will-a-shorter-barrel-cost-you/" target="_blank">6mm Creedmoor</a>, <a href="http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/01/rifleshooter-com-308-win-barrel-cut-down-velocity-test/" target="_blank">.308 Winchester</a>, and <a href="http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/08/cutting-338-lm-barrel-from-30-to-17-velocity-loss-revealed/" target="_blank">.338 Lapua Magnum</a>. See these test results at <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/" target="_blank">Rifleshooter.com</a>.</p>
<p><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/Blog/308cut04.jpg" alt=".308 Win barrel length cut test"></p>
<p><b>Much Different Results with 6mmBR and a Longer Barrel</b><br />
The results from Rifleshooter.com&#8217;s .223/5.56 test are quite different than the results we recorded some years ago with a barrel chambered for the 6mmBR cartridge. When we cut our 6mmBR barrel down from 33&#8243; to 28&#8243; we only lost about <strong>8 FPS per inch</strong>. Obviously this is a different cartridge type, but also our 6mmBR barrel end length was longer than Rifleshooter.com&#8217;s .223 Rem start length. Velocity loss may be more extreme with shorter barrel lengths. And, of course, different cartridge types and powder/bullet combinations will yield different results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2022/02/223-rem-velocity-by-barrel-length-cut-down-test-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>.223 Rem Velocity Per Inch Revealed by Barrel Cut-Down Test</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2021/04/223-rem-velocity-per-inch-revealed-by-barrel-cut-down-test/</link>
		<comments>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2021/04/223-rem-velocity-per-inch-revealed-by-barrel-cut-down-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2021 05:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[- Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gunsmithing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Tip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.223 Rem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Cut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Length Velocity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cut-Down Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rifleshooter.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=65764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of us own a .223 Rem rifle. Now, thanks to our friends at Rifleshooter.com we can assess exactly how velocity changes with barrel length for this popular cartridge. Rifleshooter.com performed an interesting test, cutting the barrel of a .223 Rem rifle from 26&#8243; all the way down to 16.5&#8243;. The cuts were made in [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target='_blank'><img border="0" src="http://accurateshooter.net/Blog/rifleshooter03.jpg" alt=".223 Rem Cut-Down Test barrel UMC m855"></a></p>
<p>Most of us own a .223 Rem rifle. Now, thanks to our friends at <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank">Rifleshooter.com</a> we can assess exactly how velocity changes with barrel length for this popular cartridge.</p>
<p><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank">Rifleshooter.com</a> performed an interesting test, cutting the barrel of a .223 Rem rifle from 26&#8243; all the way down to 16.5&#8243;. The cuts were made  in one-inch intervals with a rotary saw. At each cut length, velocity was measured with a Magnetospeed chronograph. To make the test even more interesting, four different types of .223 Rem/5.56 ammo were chron&#8217;d at each barrel length. The Rifleshooter.com team that conducts these tests has a full-service gun shop, 782 Custom Gunworks &#8212; visit <a href="https://782guns.com" target="_blank">782guns.com</a>.</p>
<p><center><big><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank"><b>READ RifleShooter.com 5.56/.223 Barrel Cut-Down Test Article &#187;</b></big></a></center></p>
<p><big><b>Test Barrel Lost 25.34 FPS Per Inch (.223 Rem Chambering)</b><br />
How much velocity do you think was lost, on average, for each 1&#8243; reduction in barrel length? The answer may surprise you. The average speed loss of the four types of .223/5.56 ammo, with a 9.5&#8243; shortening of barrel length, was 240.75 fps total (from start to finish). That works out to an <strong>average loss of 25.34 fps per inch</strong>.</big></p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="4">
<tr>
<td>5.56/.223 Barrel Cut-Down Speed Test 26&#8243; to 16.5&#8243;</td>
<td>Start FPS at 26&#8243;</td>
<td>End FPS at 16.5&#8243;</td>
<td>Total Loss</td>
<td>Average Loss Per Inch</td>
</tr>
<tr></td>
<td>UMC .223 55gr</td>
<td>3182*</td>
<td>2968</td>
<td>214</td>
<td>22.5 FPS</tr>
<tr>
<td>Federal M193 55gr</td>
<td>3431</td>
<td>3187</td>
<td>244</td>
<td>25.7 FPS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Win m855 62gr</td>
<td>3280</td>
<td>2992</td>
<td>288</td>
<td>30.3 FPS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Blk Hills .223 68gr</td>
<td>2849</td>
<td>2632</td>
<td>217</td>
<td>22.8 FPS</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><i>*There may have been an error. The 25&#8243; velocity was higher at 3221 fps.</i></p>
<h2><a href="http://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target='_blank'>See inch-by-inch Barrel Cut-Down Velocity Data HERE &#187;</a></h2>
<p>Rifleshooter.com observed: &#8220;Cutting the barrel from 26″ to 16.5&#8243; resulted in a velocity reduction of 214 ft/sec with the UMC 223 55-grain cartridge, 244 ft/sec with the Federal M-193 cartridge, 288 ft/sec with the Winchester M855 cartridge and 217 ft/sec with the Back Hills 223 68-grain match cartridge.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p><b>How the Test Was Done</b><br />
The testers described their procedure as follows: &#8220;Ballistic data was gathered using a Magnetospeed barrel-mounted ballistic chronograph. At each barrel length, the rifle was fired from a front rest with rear bags, with five rounds of each type of ammunition. Average velocity and standard deviation were logged for each round. Once data was gathered for each cartridge at a given barrel length, the rifle was cleared and the bolt was removed. The barrel was cut off using a cold saw. The test protocol was repeated for the next length. Temperature was 45.7&deg; F.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2014/04/223-remington5-56-nato-velocity-versus-barrel-length-a-man-his-chop-box-and-his-friends-rifle/" target="_blank"><strong>CLICK HERE to Read the Rifleshooter.com Test</strong></a>. This includes detailed charts with inch-by-inch velocity numbers.</p></blockquote>
<p><b>See More Barrel Cut-Down Tests on Rifleshooter.com</b><br />
Rifleshooter.com has performed barrel cut-down tests for many other calibers/chamberings including <a href="http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/05/6mm-creedmoor-how-many-fps-will-a-shorter-barrel-cost-you/" target="_blank">6mm Creedmoor</a>, <a href="http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/01/rifleshooter-com-308-win-barrel-cut-down-velocity-test/" target="_blank">.308 Winchester</a>, and <a href="http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2019/08/cutting-338-lm-barrel-from-30-to-17-velocity-loss-revealed/" target="_blank">.338 Lapua Magnum</a>. See these test results at <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/" target="_blank">Rifleshooter.com</a>.</p>
<p><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/Blog/308cut04.jpg" alt=".308 Win barrel length cut test"></p>
<p><b>Much Different Results with 6mmBR and a Longer Barrel</b><br />
The results from Rifleshooter.com&#8217;s .223/5.56 test are quite different than the results we recorded some years ago with a barrel chambered for the 6mmBR cartridge. When we cut our 6mmBR barrel down from 33&#8243; to 28&#8243; we only lost about <strong>8 FPS per inch</strong>. Obviously this is a different cartridge type, but also our 6mmBR barrel end length was longer than Rifleshooter.com&#8217;s .223 Rem start length. Velocity loss may be more extreme with shorter barrel lengths. And, of course, different cartridge types and powder/bullet combinations will yield different results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2021/04/223-rem-velocity-per-inch-revealed-by-barrel-cut-down-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6mm Creedmoor &#8212; Barrel Length Velocity Test &#8212; 24&#8243; to 16.1&#8243;</title>
		<link>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2020/08/6mm-creedmoor-barrel-length-velocity-test-24-to-16-1/</link>
		<comments>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2020/08/6mm-creedmoor-barrel-length-velocity-test-24-to-16-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2020 14:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[- Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bullets, Brass, Ammo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gear Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gunsmithing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tactical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6CM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6mm Creedmoor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6mm Creedmore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Cut-Down Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrel Length Velocity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Barr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creedmoor Velocity Test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/?p=64613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our friend Bill Marr of Rifleshooter.com has done it again &#8212; conducted a fascinating 6mm Creedmoor barrel cut-down test that reveals how velocity changes with barrel length. This time Bill started with a 24&#8243; Proof Research stainless steel barrel on a Howa action. Bill says this was a well-used barrel, with over 1800 rounds through [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/pix/billcut1900.jpg" alt="6mm 6.5 Creedmoor rifleshooter.com Bill Barr barrel length cut-down velocity test chronograph Magnetospeed chrono"></p>
<p>Our friend Bill Marr of <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/" target="_blank">Rifleshooter.com</a> has done it again &#8212; conducted a fascinating <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2019/05/6-creedmoor-effects-of-barrel-length-on-muzzle-velocity/" target="_blank">6mm Creedmoor barrel cut-down test</a> that reveals how velocity changes with barrel length. This time Bill started with a 24&#8243; Proof Research stainless steel barrel on a Howa action. Bill says this was a well-used barrel, with over 1800 rounds through it. So, the velocities might be a bit different than a new barrel of similar length. Bill cut the barrel down in one-inch increments. Here are some results from the test:</p>
<p><big><strong>24&#8243; Velocity: 2893 FPS | 20&#8243; Velocity: 2755 FPS  | 16.1&#8243; Velocity: 2598 FPS</strong></big></p>
<h2><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2019/05/6-creedmoor-effects-of-barrel-length-on-muzzle-velocity/" target="_blank">CLICK HERE for FULL TEST REPORT on RifleShooter.com &#187;</a></h2>
<p><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/pix/billcut1903.jpg" alt="6mm 6.5 Creedmoor rifleshooter.com Bill Barr barrel length cut-down velocity test chronograph Magnetospeed chrono"></p>
<p><img class="alignright" hspace="10" src="https://accurateshooter.net/pix/billcut1902.jpg" alt="6mm 6.5 Creedmoor rifleshooter.com Bill Barr barrel length cut-down velocity test chronograph Magnetospeed chrono">For this latest test, Rifleshooter cut the barrel in one-inch increments from 24&#8243; to 16.1&#8243; (just over legal minimum). Velocities were measured with a <a href="http://www.avantlink.com/click.php?tt=ale&#038;pw=164303&#038;mi=10077&#038;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.brownells.com%2Fsearch%2Findex.htm%3Fk%3Dmagnetospeed%26ksubmit%3Dy" target="_blank">MagnetoSpeed V3 chronograph</a> mounted on arm attached to the stock. This allowed the chrono to be adjusted inwards as the barrel was cut shorter, inch by inch.</p>
<p>For the 6mm Creedmoor cartridge, Bill loaded <a href="http://www.avantlink.com/click.php?tt=ale&#038;pw=164303&#038;mi=10077&#038;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.brownells.com%2Fsearch%2Findex.htm%3Fk%3Dhornady%2B108%26ksubmit%3Dy" target="_blank">Hornady 108gr ELD Match bullets</a> over 41.5 grains of Hodgdon H4350 with CCI 200 primers in new Starline brass.</p>
<p>The results were interesting to say the least. Bill reports: &#8220;Muzzle velocities ranged from 2,893 ft/sec at 24″ to 2,598 ft/sec at 16″ for a decrease in muzzle velocity of 295 ft/sec. Muzzle velocity changes per inch of barrel length ranged from 6 ft/sec per inch between 20 and 19 inches to 63 ft/sec per inch between 19 and 18 inches. Average velocity change per inch of barrel length was 37.9 ft/sec.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>Bill concludes: &#8220;An average drop of 37.9 ft/sec/inch of barrel is fairly significant and is what would be expected with a fast moving 6mm cartridge like the 6mm Creedmoor. While I’m used to seeing 6mm Creedmoors with slightly longer barrel lengths than 24″, when coupled with a sound suppressor the additional length can make moving the rifle quickly more difficult.</p>
<p>I’d suggest staying with longer barrel lengths wherever possible with this cartridge. At shorter lengths, it does give up more performance than its big brother the 6.5 Creedmoor.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<h2>More 6mm Creedmoor Velocity Data from 2017 Cut-Down Test</h2>
<p>If you&#8217;re curious about 6mm Creedmoor velocities at longer barrel lengths, back in 2017 Rifleshooter completed a <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2017/01/6-creedmoor-barrel-length-versus-muzzle-velocity-31-to-17-inches/" target="_blank">6mm Creedmoor barrel cut-down test</a> from 31 inches all the way down to 17 inches. The test included four bullet types from 95 grains to 110 grains. With the 110gr Sierra MK, velocity at 31&#8243; was an impressive 3110 fps. Surprisingly the velocity didn&#8217;t decrease that much for the first few inches. Even at 26&#8243; (a five-inch reduction), measured velocity with the 110s was 3073 fps, a loss of 7.4 fps per inch on average. With a barrel shortened all the way to 20&#8243; however, velocity had dropped down to 2949 fps, a significant (161 fps) loss. <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2017/01/6-creedmoor-barrel-length-versus-muzzle-velocity-31-to-17-inches/" target="_blank">CLICK HERE</a> for complete results from that <a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2017/01/6-creedmoor-barrel-length-versus-muzzle-velocity-31-to-17-inches/" target="_blank">31&#8243;-17&#8243; Barrel Cut-Down Test</a>. </p>
<p><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2017/01/6-creedmoor-barrel-length-versus-muzzle-velocity-31-to-17-inches/" target="_blank"><img src="https://accurateshooter.net/pix/billcut1904logo.jpg" alt="6mm 6.5 Creedmoor rifleshooter.com Bill Barr barrel length cut-down velocity test chronograph Magnetospeed chrono"></a></p>
<p><big><big><a href="https://rifleshooter.com/2017/01/6-creedmoor-barrel-length-versus-muzzle-velocity-31-to-17-inches/" target="_blank"><strong>CLICK HERE for 31&#8243; to 17&#8243; 6mm Creedmoor Barrel Test Report &#187;</strong></a></big></big></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2020/08/6mm-creedmoor-barrel-length-velocity-test-24-to-16-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
