Illustrated History of the Second Amendment (Part Two)
Last month we showcased an Illustrated History of the Second Amendment by attorney Robert J. McWhirter. That fascinating article, published in Arizona Attorney magazine, explained the history and evolution of the Second Amendment in a novel way. McWhirter included dozens of annotations with images from old books, magazines, even stills from movies and television shows. This was certainly the most entertaining discussion of the Second Amendment ever published.
This month, Arizona Attorney released Part Two of McWhirter’s Illustrated History of the Second Amendment. Like Part One, this article is informative and chock full of fascinating historical footnotes. The footnotes are just as interesting as the main article, as they feature dozens of eye-catching graphics — everything from 18th century lithographs to modern movie posters. Click the Links below to read both Part Two and Part One:
Part Two of McWhirter’s illustrated history addresses interesting historical subtopics such as: Guns and Colonial Slavery, Militias and Minutemen, and the Founders’ concerns about Government Tyranny. If you have any interest in American history or Constitutional law, check out this article — it’s definitely worth a read. Part Two of McWhiter’s Illustrated History is available FREE online in digital, eZine Format.
Similar Posts:
- Illustrated History of the Second Amendment (Part One)
- Illustrated History of the Second Amendment — Worth a Read
- The Illustrated History of Firearms, Second Edition
- Illustrated History of Firearms — Great Book for Collectors
- Illustrated History of Firearms — Great Book for Gun Collectors
Share the post "Illustrated History of the Second Amendment (Part Two)"
Tags: eZine, German Salazar, Illustrated History, Robert McWhirter, Second Amendment
There is often a polarization of view in articles like these, and this one is no exception. Clearly this author takes the view of an attorney. Carefully filtering what is included in the research and what is not, he supports the view that “there is much work for the lawyers…”, or that “In the end, law, and not guns, secures society’s boundaries.” It is his point of view, but to me it smacks of someone who believes his contribution is more important than those guys with the guns who do all the dirty work… go ahead and try one without the other, see how well that turns out.
Would love to have a pistol like that, to wear it would be a honor.