Lawsuit Challenges California Magazine Laws in Federal Court
The Second Amendment Foundation, joined by several other groups and individuals, has filed a lawsuit in Federal District Court in California, challenging that state’s laws prohibiting the possession, use or acquisition of so-called “large capacity magazines,” calling the state’s bans on magazines “hopelessly vague and ambiguous.”
Joining SAF are the Calguns Foundation, Firearms Policy Coalition, Firearms Policy Foundation and six individuals including one retired California peace officer. The lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California.
The lawsuit raises a constitutional challenge to California Penal Code § 32310, as recently amended by Senate Bill 1446 and Proposition 63, and Penal Code § 32390 (the “Large-Capacity Magazine Ban”). Collectively those laws require Californians to relinquish, forfeit, or destroy lawfully-obtained full capacity magazines. The penalties for non-compliance are severe. The lawsuit alleges that if these measures are enforced as applied, they would “individually and collectively prohibit law-abiding citizens from continuing to possess, use, or acquire lawfully-owned firearms, in common use for lawful purposes such as self-defense (inside and outside the home), competition, sport, and hunting.”
“What we see in the enactment of such laws,” said SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb, “is continued erosion by the state of its citizens’ Constitutional rights guaranteed under the Second Amendment. When the U.S. Supreme Court incorporated the Second Amendment to the states via the 14th Amendment under the 2010 McDonald ruling, it automatically should have stopped this kind of prohibition.
“As we state in our lawsuit,” he continued, “this magazine ban fails to provide fair or even adequate notice to law-abiding gun owners of what they may do with their personal property without being subject to criminal sanctions. In effect, this ban amounts to a backdoor form of confiscation, in part, of bearable arms that are protected by the Constitution.”
“Enforcement of this ban,” Gottlieb concluded, “would immediately place thousands of law-abiding California gun owners in jeopardy of criminal liability and subjects their personal property to forfeiture, seizure and permanent confiscation, which is government taking, without due process or compensation. We cannot allow that to go unchallenged.”
The Second Amendment Foundation (www.saf.org) is the nation’s oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 650,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control.
Similar Posts:
- California Gun Waiting Period Laws Ruled Unconstitutional
- Second Amendment Foundation Sues California State DOJ
- Warning to Californians — Magazine Ban Takes Effect July 1st
- SAF and NRA Challenge Washington Semi-Auto Gun Ban
- SAF & NRA File Lawsuit Challenging Washington Initiative 1639
Share the post "Lawsuit Challenges California Magazine Laws in Federal Court"
Tags: Alan Gottlieb, California, Gun Laws, Magazine ban, Prop 63, Second Amendment Foundation
NRA missing from action…again! Hiding in HQ fort in Maryland.
Editor: The most important legal challenge in California has yet to be filed. I believe the #1 threat to our Second Amendment rights is the recent law that requires a STATE LICENSE to purchase ammo. This will require a background check, and payment of a fee to the Department of Justice. Once the state forces people to have licenses, the DOJ can then price the license out of reach, or impose requirements of liability insurance etc. All this in a state which won’t impose ID requirements for voting and probably has the highest incidence of voter fraud in the nation, with over 60% of ballots being cast by mail (adsentee).