USA Shooting 300M National Championships Held at Fort Benning
Report and Photographs by Tony Chow
On August 12th to 16th, USAMU’s Fort Benning range hosted the 2013 USA Shooting 300m National Championships. This match, held every four years, nominates athletes to represent the United States at the 300m World Championships, due to be held in 2014, in Granada, Spain.
300m Shooting — A World-Class Challenge
300m shooting is a challenging discipline. With much smaller scoring rings than NRA targets, the 300m target can bedevil even the most experienced High Power shooters, especially in tricky wind conditions. While European 300m shooters typically use expensive rifles from the likes of Gruenig & Elmiger (G&E) and Bleiker, less costly American-made equipment has proven to be every bit as competitive. Case in point are the free rifles used by the USAMU team, all of which are built from American target actions such as Panda and BAT, fitted with Krieger barrels, and glass-bedded into Anschütz stocks.
The competition took place in unseasonably mild weather for this time of the year in Georgia. As the popularity of 300m shooting is limited in the United States, 21 shooters in total took part in four days of competition. Despite the light participation, the athletes included some of the best international rifle shooters in the country. The relaxed and club-like atmosphere belied intense and high-level competition on the firing line.
Electronic targets record all shots as 10, 9, 8, etc., with the X-count being the first tiebreaker. Each whole number score is accompanied by a more precise score that ranges from 0-100. An official 10, for example, could be anything from 91 (on the edge of the ring), all the way to 100 (dead center). The more precise score is NOT used officially for score keeping in ISSF competition, but could be in the future, as already is the case in 50m prone and 10m air rifle.
3P Course of Fire and Results
The 3P events occupied the first two days of competition. Athletes shot in three positions–kneeling, prone, and standing — using free rifles, mostly chambered in 6BR. Under ISSF rules, men fire 40 record shots in each position, while women fire 20 record shots in each position. Each event is repeated on the second day, and the two-day aggregates determined the winner. In Men’s 300m 3P, USAMU’s Joseph Hall, who had never shot a 300m match before, beat his more experienced teammates Joseph Hein and Michael McPhail to take gold. Among women, USAMU’s Erin Lorenzen edged out 2008 World Championship veterans Reya Kempley and Janet Raab for the gold.
The prone and Standard Rifle events followed in the second half of the competition. The 300m prone match is shot by both men and women, using same free rifles as in the 3P events. The Standard Rifle match is another 3-position event, except contested only among men, using rifles strictly limited in external shape and adjustability. Cooler temperatures and intermittent rain made conditions trickier to read than during the first two days. In men’s prone, USAMU’s Eric Uptagrafft took gold, edging out Unit teammates Hall and McPhail. In women’s prone, Erin Lorenzen once again came out on top over Reya Kempley (photo below) and Michelle Bohren.
In the Standard Rifle event, AMU’s Joseph Hall continued his good form and took another gold over teammate Joseph Hein. Equally noteworthy is the third place finisher Steve Goff. Goff, an AMU Hall of Famer who now competes as a senior in USAS matches, beat back much younger challengers to earn the third and final slot in the 2014 US Men’s Standard Rifle Team.
Cartridge Options for 300m Shooting — by Tony Chow
The cartridge of choice in 300m is 6mmBR Norma (aka 6BR). The AMU shooters all shoot Norma Diamond Line 6BR factory ammo, loaded with moly-coated 105gr Berger HPBT bullets, with the notable exception of prone match winner Eric Uptagrafft, who shoots handloads with HBN-coated bullets in his 6mm Dasher. Civilian shooters mostly shoot the 6mmBR as well, also preferring Berger bullets. I was the odd man out shooting a Gruenig & Elmiger (G&E) chambered in 6.5×47 Lapua. That cartridge was actually the result of a collaboration between G+E and Lapua to create an alternative to 6BR, though in the 300m world, it never managed to catch on. There was one shooter using 6.5-284 and another shooting a wildcat cartridge called “.260 BMR (boomer)”.I’m not the authority on the pros and cons of various calibers. I doubt that most world-class 300m shooters concern themselves too much with these matters. The 6BR is simply good enough. It holds well inside the 10-Ring, is relatively economical, and offers extremely long barrel life when using mild factory loads. G+E rates its chrome-moly, cut-rifled 6BR barrels as capable of lasting 7,000 rounds. The AMU gunsmith, Glenn Sulser, told me that the AMU’s policy is to re-barrel at the 4,500-5,000 round mark.
Longer cartridges such as 6.5×47 and 6XC are supposed to offer easier feeding, but in my observation, the nose-heavy nature of 6BR is, in practice, not a major problem for 300m shooters. One of the advantages of 6.5×47 is even longer barrel life, and that’s the reason I went for this caliber myself. But looking back now, the greater recoil and extra cost in brass and powder are probably not worth it.
Factory Ammo vs. Handloads — Cost Considerations
One of the advantages the AMU shooters enjoyed over the civilians is that the Unit marksmen had an unlimited supply of ammo, and therefore could shoot as many sighters as they wished. In a 15-minute sighting-in period, it was not uncommon for AMU shooters to fire 20+ sighter shots, just as they do in smallbore. We civilians had to settle with under 10 sighters, in order to leave enough for the match.Unless you are filthy rich or have someone else paying for the ammo, reloading is definitely the only way to go. A reloaded round costs under 50 cents a piece. The European factory ammo costs nearly $3 a round these days (as sold in the USA).
CLICK Photos to See Full-Screen Images:
Similar Posts:
- Three-Way Shoot-Off in Smallbore Prone Match at Perry
- 6BRs Dominate 300m Europa Cup
- Kempley Wins Iron Sights Prone Championship with Perfect Score
- USAMU Wins Interservice Team Match at Quantico
- USAMU Shooter Breaks Records in Eastern CMP Cup Win
Share the post "USA Shooting 300M National Championships Held at Fort Benning"
Tags: 3-position, 300m, 3P, Electronic Targets, Fort Benning, Gruenig Elmiger, Tony Chow
”While European 300m shooters typically use expensive rifles from the likes of Gruenig & Elmiger (G&E) and Bleiker, less costly American-made equipment has proven to be every bit as competitive”
Ignorance at its best.300m rifles are off the shelf items in Europe not custom builds and most cost less than US built rifles.
Mr. Chow,
Thank you so much for the informative article and the photography. I particularly appreciated the ability to click on each picture and get a close-up.
Tom Alves
Very good artical,interesting read.
‘Ignorance at its best.300m rifles are off the shelf items in Europe not custom builds and most cost less than US built rifles.”
While “budget” standard rifles exist, the top tier of 300m competition is dominated by G+E, Bleiker, and Tanner. Some Keppelers can also be seen on the line. A case in point is the recently concluded European Championships. Those interested can go over to ech2013.com and take a look at the picture galleries.
The point that we are trying to make is that American guns can be competitive, not just for beginners, but at the highest level of the discipline.
I do not doubt US guns are competitive but unlike even G&E which is serially manufactured they are all custom builds,playing the under dog card on basis of budget US built rifles is funny to say the least.
But anyway great to see some interest for 300m shooting in US. Its quite sad that 300m is obscure even in most of Europe that is why swiss guns dominate as they are just about the only mayor European nation that is keeping the 300m alive and well.
Mr. T, “off the shelf” or “custom” says nothing about price or quality.
A Gruenig & Elmiger 300 meter rifle starts at about 5k US.
I apologize if the article gave the impression that we are disparaging European rifles in favor of American ones. Our intent is not to start a Euro-v-US argument, and we call on our readers to refrain from feeding what appears to be an incipient flame war.
Rather, our intent is to simply show that the cost of entry to 300m shooting isn’t as high as the preponderance of $6000+ rifles on the line would suggest, and that American shooters can take advantage of the lower costs of their native precision shooting industry to compete at the world level.
Mr. T is correct in saying that G+E, Bleiker, and Tanner are all “serially produced” rifles. You can either buy them “off the rack” from retailers, or exercise a limited number of customization options directly with the manufacturer. These are, strictly speaking, “factory rifles”, though very high-end ones.
By contrast, Most American match-grade firearms are one-off custom builds, often with custom-machined parts.
This is partly a reflection of the differences of two shooting cultures. In Europe, especially in Germanic countries, competitive shooters comprise a much greater percentage of gun owners than they do in the United States. The larger European market for match-quality arms supports a larger industry dedicated to its needs.
Comparisons between European and American gun cultures is a fascinating subject, one that we hope to explore further in these pages.
Yes G+E costs a lot of $$$ but its the same for us buying US made stuff.
Let me illustrate in the article above SS offers a F class rifle for 3800$ that is a fair price but if you import it into Europe you are looking at roughly 5500$(0% profit margin) and f class rifles are cheaper, 300m or 3p rifle stock costs a lot more .So its great that stocks are fully compatible for both 3p rimfire and 300m rifle actions so in many cases we are buying just barreled actions.
As for gun culture Swiss are the worlds no.1 gun country, most gun owners shoot competitions and on lower levels military even provides ammo and well equipped(electronic scoring) shooting ranges to do so, all with the goal of having a conscript army that knows how to handle their guns.
Can you post the scores? This is the only information that I have been able to find on the match
I have Grunig & Elmiger 300m and 0.22 Racers and BAT 3LL f open rifles by Dolphin Gun Co.
All are manufactured on cnc machinery and very high quality…and brOadby comparable cost once imported into the UK
F class rifles have the additional cost of a decent scope z that is countered by the cost of an issf stock in 300m