Firearm Finishes — Comparison Testing in Salt Chamber
When evaluating firearm finishes, one should consider hardness, chemical resistance, lubricity, abrasion resistance, and color. However, none of these factors are as critical as corrosion protection. The average firearm owner deals with corrosion more than any other finish-related problem. Accordingly, when selecting an exterior finish for the metal components of your guns, you should look for a product with superior corrosion resistance. Thanks to Cerakote, we now have some science to help you make that decision….
How well do various firearm finishes resist corrosion?
Watch the video below to find out.
Eight Gun Finishes Tested — With Surprising Results
Eight (8) various finishes are tested, including Blueing, Cerakote, DuraCoat, FailZero, Ion Bond, KG Gun Kote, NiBX, and Phosphate (Parkerizing). Eight metal firearm components (each with a different finish) are placed into the salt chamber to see how long it takes for each finish to show initial signs of corrosion. To provide a baseline for comparison, a “naked” 416 stainless steel barrel was also placed inside the test chamber. The test was started, and for each coating, the time was recorded when corrosion started to appear. FYI, if you thought “stainless steel” can’t rust, think again. The stainless barrel sample (along with the blued metal sample) showed visible corrosion after just 24 hours!
After 24 Hours in Salt Chamber
After 48 Hours in Salt Chamber
After 172 Hours in Salt Chamber
Salt Chamber Testing — 5% Salt Concentration at 95°F
According to ASTM B117-03, the Corrosion Test provides a controlled corrosive environment which has been utilized to produce relative corrosion resistance information for specimens of metals and coated metals exposed in a given test chamber. The salt chamber is set to a temperature of 95 degrees Fahrenheit with a 5% salt concentration. Salt Chamber testing is used to draw a comparison between metals and finishes and does not correlate to a specific number of hours of real world use.
Similar Posts:
- Firearm Finish Comparison Testing in Salt Chamber
- Cerakote Gun Finishing — From Start to Finish
- Be Amazed at the Tests Zeiss Does for Its Riflescopes
- Cerakote Launches New Website with 10% Off Promotion
- Protect Your Guns in Winter — Video Reveals Best Rust Blockers
Share the post "Firearm Finishes — Comparison Testing in Salt Chamber"
Tags: Cerakote, Lab Testing, Salt Chamber
Hard to understand why a company would not make its COMPARATIVE testing scenario as transparent as possible. At minimum by making sure everything is identical except for the variable being compared. In the video the second test uses the same test pieces for each competitor. However in the first test (in the video), corrosion, the test pieces are NOT the same. The video noted they are not the same as if that was no issue, just matter of fact. Sorry, NOT reasonable since corrosion is much more likely when there are sharp corners/edges, with possibly different corner.edge radii, and possibly a significant difference in the number of such corners/edges. So, WHY wasn’t the same product used for all test pieces?
316 stainless should have been used. NOT 416. The ROBAR finishes should also have been tested. They usually blow everyone out of the water!!