Firearms Carry Right Recognized in District of Columbia Case
Federal Courthouse in Washington, DC. Photo by AgnosticPreachersKid under CC 3.0 license.
Story based on report by Second Amendment Foundation.
This week, the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) won a precedent-setting victory against “good reason” requirements for concealed carry in our Nation’s capital when the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia issued a permanent injunction against enforcement of such a requirement in the District. This order was issued in the consolidated cases of Wrenn v. District of Columbia and Grace v. District of Columbia.
According to the ABA Journal: “The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled 2-1 on Tuesday that the restriction violates the Second Amendment because it amounts to a total ban on the right to carry a gun for most residents.” The 2-1 decision, written by Judge Thomas Beall Griffith, stated:
“At the Second Amendment’s core lies the right of responsible citizens to carry firearms for personal self-defense beyond the home, subject to longstanding restrictions… The District’s good-reason law is necessarily a total ban on exercises of that constitutional right for most D.C. residents. That’s enough to sink this law under (the 2008 U.S. Supreme Court’s Heller ruling).” Griffith added, in no uncertain terms: “The Second Amendment erects some absolute barriers that no gun law may breach.”
“Today’s ruling contains some powerful language that affirms what we have argued for many years, that requiring a so-called ‘good cause’ to exercise a constitutionally-protect right does not pass the legal smell test,” said SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb. “We’re particularly pleased that the opinion makes it clear that the Second Amendment’s core generally covers carrying in public for self-defense.”
The court went on to state in its 31-page majority opinion that the District of Columbia’s “good cause” requirement was essentially designed to prevent the exercise of the right to bear arms by most District residents. Therefore, the net effect of the requirement amounted to nothing more than a complete prohibition in direct contradiction to the 2008 Heller decision that struck down the District of Columbia’s 30-year handgun ban.
After the decision was handed down, SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan Gottlieb released a statement saying, “To read the majority opinion and not come away convinced that such ‘good reason’ or ‘good cause’ requirements are just clever ways to prevent honest citizens from exercising their rights is not possible. To say we are delighted with the ruling would be an understatement. We are simply more encouraged to keep fighting and winning firearms freedom one lawsuit at a time.” The Second Amendment Foundation invites donations to support future legal efforts to protect Second Amendment rights.
Similar Posts:
- Heller Files New Lawsuit vs. District of Columbia
- Landmark Gun Rights Case Headed to U.S. Supreme Court
- Important Second Amendment Case Before U.S. Supreme Court
- High Court Hears "McDonald v. Chicago" Today
- California Gun Waiting Period Laws Ruled Unconstitutional
Share the post "Firearms Carry Right Recognized in District of Columbia Case"
Tags: Concealed Carry, Heller, SAF, Second Amendment Foundation, Wrenn
What does this mean for California and NY?
Nothing, if the Supreme Court won’t hear the case.
I’d like the name of the dissenting judge and to hear their unAmerican argument.
If I understood the complete story , and the correct legal process , the District lawyers have the right to have the case heard by the whole panel at the circuit . If they lose at that level , they can then ask SCOTUS to hear the case . Should the circuit court full panel overturn the ruling , the Plaintiff has the right to seek a hearing before SCOTUS . Personally ; I think the full panel will uphold the ruling , and that will end it .
The ruling was very clearly stated , and the anti-gunners won’t take anything to SCOTUS that isn’t a “LOCK” for them to win .