Can’t Find Reloading Powder? 1000 Grain Bottles Coming Soon!
We all know reloading powder is in VERY short supply these days. And the most popular propellants, such as Varget, H4350, and Reloder 16, are almost impossible to find at reasonable prices. Thankfully, there is a new solution in the works — smaller containers. This should give handloaders a whole new way to source those precious powders needed for a day at the range. And even if the volume is limited, something is ALWAYS better than nothing, right?
The big (and small) news for reloaders is that the major powder suppliers plan to start shipping powders in more compact, easy-to-ship containers. Instead of buying a pound of powder, you will be able to purchase an efficient, handy 1000 grain container. These are light weight (just 1/7th of a pound) so they are convenient to transport and carry. And you’ll never have the problem of over supply. A 1000-grain container with load approximately 33 6mm BR rounds — that should be plenty for a day at the range. We’re blessed to have this new compact powder option thanks to the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT).
The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) recently approved new smaller containers for shipment of smokeless powder. The new containers are designed to hold 1000 grains, exactly one-seventh of a pound. That works out to 2.29 ounces of powder — quite a bit less than you are getting currently with one-pound (16 oz.) containers.
Here how it works out:
7000 grains = 1 pound = 16 ounces
1000 grains = 0.143 pounds = 2.29 ounces
Many products — from cereal boxes to Snickers bars — have been down-sized in recent years. Now downsizing has come to the powder marketplace. The strategy behind the smaller containers is simple. In a market where demand vastly outstrips available supply, the smaller containers allow powder-makers to generate more revenue with a given amount of powder inventory. Will consumers accept the smaller powder containers? Probably so — 1000 grains is enough to load 20-22 rounds of .308 Winchester. In the current marketplace (with many powders virtually impossible to find), most consumers would probably prefer to get 2.3 ounces of their favorite powder, rather than nothing at all. (NOTE: The major powder suppliers will continue to offer popular powders in 1-lb, and 8-lb containers. The new 1000-grain containers will be phased-in over time, as an alternative to the larger containers).
Why the small bottles? One industry spokesman (who asked not to be named) explained: “We’ve had a severe shortage of smokeless powder for nearly two years. The powder production plants are running at full capacity, but there’s only so much finished product to go around. By moving to smaller containers, we can ensure that our customers at least get some powder, even if it’s not as much as they want.”
Why are the new containers 2.3 ounces rather than 8 ounces (half a pound) or 4 ounces (one-quarter pound)? One of the engineers who helped develop the new DOT-approved container explained: “We looked at various sizes. We knew we had to reduce the volume significantly to achieve our unit quantity sales goals. Some of our marketing guys liked the four-ounce option — the ‘Quarter-Pounder’. That had a nice ring to it, but ultimately we decided on the 1000 grain capacity. To the average consumer, one thousand grains sounds like a large amount of powder, even if it’s really only 2.3 ounces. This size also made it much easier to bundle the powder in six-packs. We think the six-packs will be a big hit. You get nearly a pound of powder, but you can mix and match with a variety of different propellants.”
Less Bang for Your Buck?
We’re told the new 2.3-ounce powder bottles will retail for around $11.99, i.e. about $5.21 per ounce. At that price, it may seem like you’re getting less bang for your buck … but hey, something is better than nothing, right?
Currently, when you can find them, quality reloading powders are going for $45-$60 per pound (in 1-lb containers). At $45 per pound, you’re paying $2.81 per ounce. That means that the new mini-containers will be roughly twice as expensive as current one-pounders ($5.21 per ounce vs. $2.81 per ounce).
Along with the 2.3-ounce containers, the DOT has approved “six-pack” consolidated delivery units that will hold six, 1000-grain containers. Some manufacturers plan to offer “variety packs” with a selection of various powders in the 1000-grain bottles. Wouldn’t it be cool to have a six-pack with H322, H4895, Varget, H4350, H4831sc, and Retumbo?
Similar Posts:
- DOT Approves New 1000-grain (2.3 oz.) Powder Containers
- Hodgdon H4350 Powder Available Now, Both 1-LB and 8-LB
- Point-Blank Powders in Stock — PVI Has Jugs of the Good Stuff
- High Demand Powders — Where You Can Find Them
- Hodgdon H4350 Now Available at Leading Vendors
Share the post "Can’t Find Reloading Powder? 1000 Grain Bottles Coming Soon!"
Tags: DOT Shipping, Hazardous Materials, Hazmat, Hodgdon, Powder Shortage, Reloading Powder, Varget
THIS one I can almost believe…same as stamps & snickers, pretty much everything else but BS out of DC….
What’s today’s date?
Well written! If only this was a viable way to sell those slow moving powders by bundling them into a mixed pack. Like the crappy one-off craft beer that gets jammed in a sampler pack. This maybe, just maybe could have worked, but it’s the wrong day and there are NO slow moving powders.
April Fool!
New Zealand Post have already approved this packaging for ordinary mail, which will be a fsntastic benefit for those in rural areas. However the Green Party have announced a possible injunction regarding the amount of extra plastic involved. One solution may be to just put a 1000g in an envelope, rather than the plastic bottle, but we await the court’s ruling. Can I make the suggestion to the firearms industry to make 10 round packages of 22 ammo?
Dime bags of powder, how unigue.
Maaaaan… that shhhtz not funny! lol I’m almost in tears over here. I need the Costco size bottle. 50 lb. Keg and we are good! (don’t tell the fire marshal I’m storing it at home under armed guard)
Stupid idea. Now we have to pay for more plastic. ;[ Just another reason to raise prices.