Eurooptic vortex burris nightforce sale




teslong borescope digital camera barrel monitor


As an Amazon Associate, this site earns a commission from Amazon sales.









August 10th, 2026

Federal Court Blocks ATF Registration of Suppressors and SBRs

firearms policy coalition

There has a been a notable federal legal holding regarding the National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA). Two consolidated lawsuits — Jensen v. ATF and Silencer Shop Foundation v. ATF — had challenged the NFA’s regulation of now-untaxed firearms, such as suppressors, short-barreled rifles, and short-barreled shotguns. In a memo for the cons the judge held the registration requirements are no longer valid. U.S. District Court Judge James Wesley Hendrix ruled that “[b]y zeroing out the transfer and making taxes for most NFA firearms, Congress eliminated the constitutional basis for the regulations that formerly supported the taxes for those firearms.”

Gun reviewer and attorney Colion Noir explained: “For ninety years, the government defended NFA registration by tying it to Congress’s taxing power. Then the tax disappeared, and suddenly the government tried to argue the same paperwork could be justified another way. The judge didn’t buy it. And honestly, the way the gun groups set this up was borderline masterful. They beat the NFA at its own game.”

firearms policy coalitionThe Court’s injunction applies to “the plaintiffs and, where applicable, the plaintiffs’ agencies, political subdivisions, members, and customers—both current and future,” but does not take effect for 7 days “to allow the defendants to seek relief, if any, at the appellate level.”

The Jensen v. ATF plaintiffs included three individuals, Hot Shots Custom LLC, the Texas State Rifle Assoc., FPC Action Foundation, and the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. NOTE: This Jensen Case had been consolidated with a similar legal challenge entitled Silencer Shop Foundation v. ATF, with plaintiffs Silencer Shop Foundation, Silencerco, Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Gun Owners Foundation, Gun Owners of America, Inc., Brady Wetz, B&T USA, and Palmetto State Armory.

The opinion was issued on August 5, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. READ Memorandum Opinion and ORDER.

Because Congress eliminated the NFA’s making and transfer taxes for most regulated firearms in 2025, the District Court held the Act’s remaining registration and recordkeeping mandates lack any valid constitutional foundation.

“This is a massive win and an important step forward in our strategic plan to end the NFA. We cannot wait to fully and finally eliminate this unconstitutional scheme so people can exercise their rights when, where, and how they choose.” — Brandon Combs, FPC President

suppressor lawsuit Firearms policy coalition

Legal Analysis by Colion Noir of NFA Lawsuits

Permalink - Articles, - Videos, News 1 Comment »
June 18th, 2025

Senate Finance Committee Approves Elimination of $200 NFA Tax

2025 big beautiful NFA firearms act excise tax suppressor silencer legislation Senate congress

Good news for gun owners — we are a step closer to the elimination of the $200 National Firearms Act taxes on suppressors and short-barreled guns. After passage of the Big Beautiful Bill in the House of Representatives, the U.S. Senate Finance Committee officially advanced language to fully repeal the excise taxes imposed under the National Firearms Act (NFA).

Thanks to aggressive advocacy from Gun Owners of America (GOA) and mounting grassroots pressure, the Senate’s version of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” now includes full repeal of the $200 NFA tax on:

Suppressors
Short-barreled rifles (SBRs)
Short-barreled shotguns (SBSs)
“Any Other Weapons” (AOWs)

This expands the House-passed repeal of the suppressor tax. The bill next heads to the “Byrd Bath” review, where non-budgetary provisions may be stripped, but because the NFA operates primarily as a tax mechanism — given that the Supreme Court held that the NFA is primarily a tax in Sonzinky v. U.S. (1937) — GOA feels strongly that the provision ought to survive.

Erich Pratt, GOA Senior V.P., stated: “The House opened the door — now the Senate is charging through it. The American people have been forced to pay hundreds of dollars and submit to federal gun registration just to own firearms that are protected by the Second Amendment[.] This is a monumental step toward dismantling the ATF’s unconstitutional enforcement regime, and the Senate must finish the job.”

Aidan Johnston, GOA Director of Federal Affairs, added: “The Senate Finance Committee’s move to fully repeal the unconstitutional and archaic National Firearms Act tax on short-barreled firearms and suppressors is the direct result of relentless pressure from GOA’s grassroots and our lobbying efforts on Capitol Hill. The government has no right to tax and register accessories like suppressors or firearms with short barrels.”

2025 hearing protection act h.r. 1 suppressor silencer legislation Senate congress

Permalink Gear Review, News No Comments »
June 13th, 2025

FPC Urges U.S. Senate to Pass H.R. 1 with Suppressor Reforms

2025 hearing protection act h.r. 1 suppressor silencer legislation Senate congress

suppressor firearms policy coalition fpc NFA firearms actFPC Urges U.S. Senate to Pass Suppressor Reforms
The Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) has urged the U.S. Senate to pass H.R. 1, the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act”, with the legislation’s current suppressor reforms intact.

Last month, the House of Representatives passed the Act with three important provisions relating to suppressors, one removing these hearing protection devices from the extreme regulations of the National Firearms Act (NFA) and two others zeroing out the current significant Federal fees that must be paid when acquiring a suppressor.

Research by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has shown that “[t]he only potentially effective noise control method to reduce students’ or instructors’ noise exposure from gunfire is through the use of noise suppressors that can be attached to the end of the gun barrel.” The CDC’s conclusion has been affirmed by many other health experts. The American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery has endorsed “the use of firearm suppressors as an effective method of reducing the risk of hearing loss, especially when used in conjunction with conventional hearing protective measures”.

See Through Suppressor in Super Slow Motion (110,000 fps) — Click Arrow to Watch:

“Firearm suppressors are incredibly important hearing protection devices that reduce the risk of permanent damage and hearing loss for shooters and others nearby”, explained FPC President Brandon Combs. “These important safety tools are no different than hard hats, safety glasses, and fire extinguishers and should be widely available for personal use, not taxed out of the reach of ordinary Americans.”

2025 hearing protection act h.r. 404 suppressor silencer legislation Cline congress

Suppressors, On Average, Reduce Noise Levels about 30 Decibels
Suppressors work similar to a car’s muffler, redirecting exhaust gases. In an article for Ammoland, gunwriter Sam Hoober says that you can expect about 30 decibels (dB) of noise reduction from the average suppressor: “Looking at a few different products, SilencerCo attests their suppressors reduce the sound pressure of a 9mm gunshot to anywhere from 125.7 dB to 131.5 dB, depending on the model. Advanced Armament Co, another popular supplier, attests a 23 dB to 33 dB reduction or down to 127 dB. In short, we can [expect] 30 dB of attenuation as an average.” Reducing gun shot noise to the 130dB range means that the sound level with NOT permanently damage hearing.

Permalink - Videos, News, Tech Tip No Comments »