Don’t Go Deaf — Understand Risks of Concussive Hearing Loss
Did you know you can damage your hearing even if you are wearing the best hearing protection available? Well, have you ever heard of concussion (or concussive) hearing loss? There is no amount of anything you can put in or over your ears to protect you from concussion loss. My audiologist explained to me the concussion comes through the facial bone structure and damages the ear’s tiny bones.
Editor’s NOTE: This may be the most important tech article we’ve run all year. It explains how you can suffer inner ear damage and hearing loss even if you use earplugs or muffs. Read that again — hearing loss even with typical hearing protection. This kind of concussive hearing loss can result from shooting with muzzle brakes in confined spaces. Using a suppressor (aka sound moderator) can reduce the risk of concussive hearing loss. You may not have the ability to use a suppressor, but this article explains how you should be more mindful of your hearing.
Why I Use a Suppressor (Preventing Concussive Hearing Loss)
Report by Mark Kuczka, Accurate Ordnance
It must have been the road noise. I thought I was having a hard time hearing my five year old daughter speaking to me on my cell phone because of the road noise. That old SUV was kind of loud inside. Until I switched the phone to my left ear and suddenly I could hear her just fine. Wait, what just happened? I moved the phone back to the right ear and there was that muffled voice again. That’s when I knew I had a problem.
“What?” Lots of us in the shooting community have lost some hearing along the way due to our time on the range or in the field. Those of us who hunt have certainly discharged a firearm or three without ear protection and without concern for our hearing. After all, it’s just one shot, right? How much can it hurt?
Actually, that one shot DOES hurt your hearing. Any sound over 140 dB is immediate hearing loss. It just happens to be killing a small amount of our hearing so most of us continued the practice without a care. Living with hearing loss now makes me wish I could go back 20 years and better protect my hearing. I can’t change what I did in the past, but going forward I can certainly do the most to protect the hearing I still have.
I decided to shoot about a year’s worth of matches with just braked rifles. That year is when I lost significant hearing in my right ear and some in the left. I’ve gone back to shooting only suppressed rifles whenever possible.
I shot my first suppressed firearm, a .22 LR pistol, in 2003. After a few rounds I wondered why everyone (who can do so legally) didn’t shoot suppressed? No one drives without a muffler. Why would you? Point is I immediately appreciated the hearing protection benefits of suppressors. That passion got me into the business of selling suppressors and it wasn’t long before I was one of the biggest retailers for companies like AAC, SWR, SilencerCo, Ops Inc. and others. [Editor: The author’s business, Accurate Ordnance, no longer sells suppressors. So this article is NOT a sales pitch. Mark just wanted to share his experience so others might protect their hearing.]
Did you know you can damage your hearing even if you are wearing the best hearing protection available? You’ve heard guys say, “I’ll wear plugs and muffs, so I’ll be just fine shooting that .50 BMG!” Well, ever heard of concussion (or concussive) hearing loss? Yeah, I hadn’t either. I’ll sum it up the way the last audiologist I spoke with about my hearing loss did – there is no amount of anything you can put in or over your ears to protect you from concussion loss.
A hand grenade went off right next to a buddy of mine. He lost some hearing as a result of the blast. No one is really surprised by that. I mean it is an EXPLOSION. It’s loud. Duh. But I had no idea the blast from a muzzle brake could basically hurt my hearing the same way. The doctor explained to me the concussion comes through the facial bone structure and damages the ear’s tiny bones. Same thing as what can happen through any TBI (traumatic brain injury).
I’ve owned quite a few different suppressors over the years and have shot just about everything out there. I’m still as big a fan as ever. However, I wanted to see if using a suppressor in PRS (Precision Rifle Series) and similar matches was actually a hindrance. Some people feel the added length and weight of a suppressor can make getting into some shooting positions slower or problematic. So I decided to shoot about a year with a muzzle brake instead of a suppressor. I sure regret that decision…
Getting Headaches at PRS Matches Was Warning Sign
It is fairly common in PRS matches to shoot through pipes, vehicles, inside “shoot houses” and around other obstacles that echo a rifle’s blast. I noticed I was starting to get headaches about halfway through a day of PRS match shooting. I knew the issue wasn’t hydration. I mean look, if you are peeing every other stage down at the amazing CORE range facility in mid-summer you are NOT dehydrated. So, what was causing the headaches? It wasn’t until I went back to shooting suppressed in those same environments that it became clear the little mini concussions from that muzzle brake was causing my headaches. And of course the doctors confirmed that.
Let me stop here and say I am NOT anti-brake. Muzzle brakes are useful tools and for some situations are the best tools. An aggressive brake can be more effective at reducing recoil than a good suppressor. A suppressor does add some recoil reduction, just not as much as most quality brakes. Don’t forget to factor other variables, such as caliber and rifle weight, into the equation though. For example, a 15-lb 6mm Creedmoor rifle doesn’t need much recoil reduction in the first place.
So, I started shooting matches long before the PRS even existed and always shot suppressed in those days. The suppressors made communication with a partner or RO easier and it was just a more pleasant shooting experience. On the recommendations of a few people I decided to shoot about a year’s worth of matches with just braked rifles. That year is when I lost significant hearing in my right ear and some in the left. I’ve gone back to shooting only suppressed rifles whenever possible and especially at matches. I’ve only once or twice found the extra length of the suppressor made it a little more inconvenient to run a stage, but not by much. Trust me, the points I missed were not because I took two extra seconds getting the muzzle in a port or window.
My hearing is something I value and will do everything to protect from this point forward. You’ll never again see me on a match field with an un-suppressed rifle. To me the minimal gains of running a braked rifle aren’t worth losing more hearing.
| Choosing a Suppressor — What to Consider
Okay, so I have hearing loss that I can’t get back and realize I need to go back to shooting matches with a suppressor. But which one? I’ll still be shooting matches with custom fit plugs so I just need something to add a little recoil reduction and kill that concussion. At our shop, Accurate Ordnance, we generally recommend direct-thread suppressor solutions to our customers. The main reason for that is all the problems we’ve seen with other fast-attach muzzle devices. It doesn’t take much tolerance stacking to result in accuracy issues. There are a few exceptions for us and the Rugged Suppressors products top the list. Since the Razor 762 uses a muzzle brake adapter on the rifle to attach the suppressor, I can use the same suppressor on my .223 Rem training rifle. My primary match rifles are chambered in 6mm Creedmoor and 6.5 Creedmoor and the muzzle threads on those is a standard 5/8×24. My .223 Rem training rifle has .5×28 threads on the muzzle, which is standard for that caliber. Thus, the muzzle adapter interface lets me share the suppressors between all the rifles. And on that .223 Rem training rifle I have the option of switching the end cap on any of the Rugged products to a .223 aperture size, which makes the suppressors slightly more sound efficient (meaning quieter). |
Similar Posts:
- Say What? Beware the Risks of Concussive Hearing Loss
- Good Reasons to Acquire a Suppressor
- Why You Should Own a Suppressor — 18 Good Reasons
- How Loud Noise Levels Cause Hearing Loss — Wear Protection
- How Sound Hurts Your Ears — Why You Need Hearing Protection
Share the post "Don’t Go Deaf — Understand Risks of Concussive Hearing Loss"
Tags: Accurate Ordnance, Concussion, Concussive Hearing Loss, hearing Protection, Mark Kuczka, PRS, Silencer, Sound Protection, Suppressor, Tactical
This argument is not causing one inch of movement in any of the Australian States. We really need the help and legal support of the NRA here because our various Police forces do not see any link between hearing damage and their legal duty of care under the Firearms legislation.
PRS should not allow those little bastard brakes. I had a guy shooting next to me with a loud brake once I had to stop shooting.
I congratulate the authors of this Bullletin article and the folks at AccurateShooter for publishing it for our consideration. I only wish something like it’s been available 50-some years back when my dad taught me to shoot pistols either in a field near our house or in indoor ranges, such as they were back then – lanes & backstop set up in an old barn. I’ve suffered hearing loss & tinnitus ever since, and even with 33 dB plugs for competition events it’s not getting any better now that I’m 69.
As for brakes? Meh… sissies. Can’t shoot that cartridge without one? DON’T SHOOT IT THEN! Unless maybe you’re alone, by yourself. As for suppressors, I’d buy one – or more – if they were a little less pricey & not subject to the $200 Federal license imposed. Nobody I know uses one in US NRA-style competition, maybe for the same reasons?
Suppressors are specifically disallowed under NRA rules (NRA Highpower Rule 3.16.1(a)).
Go to a 3gun match, most ARs have very loud muzzle brakes. I switched to a cash hider. I was also noticing more than normal ringing after matches where brakes were on 95% of the rifles. I think there should be a $200 tax stamp on brakes and tax free suppressors.
Richard: I hear what you are saying, beware the line of reasoning that legislation should be relaxed to allow something related to firearms. It is just as valid to say that removing the cause is effective in mitigating the negative outcome.
In our Australian political environment the removal of the cause of the hearing damage is a more likely outcome than a risk reduction device being allowed. I believe that sound suppression should be an option for anyone that wants to use it. But we need to be smart about it. Claiming OH&S isn’t a smart way of doing it. We know that the OH&S controls pyramid shows removal of the offending cause is better than mitigation. So we know which will be the outcome with that line of argument.
To muzzle brake or not to muzzle brake, that is the question. Is it better to muzzle brake for the benefit of reduced recoil, but suffer the reverse sound waves? There are other choices out there. Shotgunners have found a great deal of recoil relief using added shoulder padding. Some manufactures offer a slip-on shoulder protection for recoil protection that can be worn under or over butter apparel.