Cartridge History: Ever Heard of the .244 Remington?
What we now know as the “6mm Remington” was originally called the .244 Remington. The cartridge was renamed because it was not a commercial success initially, being eclipsed by the .243 Winchester. The .244 Remington and the 6mm Remington are identical — only the name was changed. Why was the .244 Remington an “also-ran” to the .243 Win? Sierra Bullets Ballistics Technician Paul Box provides some answers…
Was Anything Wrong With The .244 Remington?
by Ballistic Technician Paul Box for Sierra Bullets Blog
The year was 1955. A time of carhops, drive-in movies, and Buffalo Bob. It was also the year that Winchester introduced the .243 Win and Remington counter-punched with the .244 Remington (now more commonly known as the 6mm Remington). The .243 Win was based off the time-proven .308 Win case while Remington chose the old war horse, the 7×57.
We’ve all read countless times how Winchester chose the 1:10″ twist, while Remington adopted the 1:12″ twist for their .244 Rem rifles. The first complaint in the gun magazines of that era was how the faster twist Winchester could handle 100 grain bullets, while Remington’s [12-twist factory rifles were supposedly limited to 90 grain bullets].
The first complaint I remember reading was that the 100-grainer was better suited for deer-sized game and the 1:12″-twist wouldn’t stabilize bullets in this weight range. Now, let’s look at this a little closer. Anybody that thinks a 100-grainer is a deer bullet and a 95-grainer isn’t, has been drinking too much Kool-aid. In all honesty, it’s all about bullet construction and Remington had constructed the [90s] with light game in mind. In other words, Remington got it right, but due to a lack of knowledge at the time on both bullet construction and stability, the .244 never gained the popularity it deserved. At that time, Sierra had the 100gr SMP and Hornady offered a 100gr RN that would both stabilize in the slower 1-12″ twist. The .244 Remington provides another classic example of how the popularity of a cartridge suffered due to a lack of knowledge.
.244 Rem vs. .243 Win — What the Experts Say
Respected gun writer Chuck Hawks says the .244 Remington deserved greater acceptance: “The superb 6mm Remington started life in 1955, the same year as the .243 Winchester. It was originally named the .244 Remington. Although the 6mm lost the popularity contest to the .243, it is one of my favorite rifle cartridges, and much appreciated by reloaders generally. The .244 Rem and 6mm Rem cartridges are completely interchangable, and anyone with a .244 Rem rifle can shoot [6mm Rem] ammunition in complete safety (or vice-versa). Remington .244 rifles made from 1958 on can stabilize all 6mm bullets, while those made in 1955 through 1957 are limited to loads using spitzer bullets not heavier than 90 grains for best accuracy.”
Nathan Foster, author of The Practical Guide to Long Range Hunting Cartridges, states: “In 1963 Remington attempted to regain ground by releasing .244 rifles with a new 1:9″ twist to handle heavier bullets. The cartridge was renamed the 6mm Remington and new ammunition was loaded giving the hunter the choice of either an 80gr bullet for varmints or a 100gr bullet for deer. In comparison to the .243 Win, factory loads for the .244/6mm Remington are slightly more powerful while hand loads increase this margin further.”
Was the .244 Remington Actually Better than the .243 Winchester?
The .244 Remington (aka “6mm Remington”) has a velocity advantage over the .243 Winchester due to a slightly larger case capacity. The longer case neck of the .244 Remington is considered desirable by handloaders. We like the added capacity and long neck of the original .244 Remington. As renamed the “6mm Remington”, the cartridge HAS developed a following, particularly with varmint hunters looking for a high-velocity 6mm option. But it never achieved the success of the .243 Winchester for many reasons. As a member of the .308 family of cartridges, the .243 Winchester has certain obvious advantages. First, you can simply neck down .308 Win brass, which was available at low cost from many sources. Moreover, a .308 Win or 7mm-08 full-length sizing die could be used for body sizing. Still the .244 Remington (6mm Remington) presents an interesting “what if?” story…
Similar Posts:
- ‘Also-Ran’ Cartridges — The .244 Remington (aka 6mm Rem)
- The .244 Remington — Why and How It Failed to Succeed
- New 6mm and 6.5mm Tipped MatchKings from Sierra
- SHOT Show Report: New Palma .308 Bullet from Sierra
- Lastest Load Data for .224 Valkyrie from Sierra
Share the post "Cartridge History: Ever Heard of the .244 Remington?"
Tags: .243 Winchester, .244 Remington, 6mm Remington, Cartridge History, Chuck Hawks, Nathan Hunt
one inefficient barrel burner vs another…
but they are cool.
Had one as a base for a wildcat. Great fun but burnt the barrel to crocodile skin. 6BR much better for calibre.
I have loved the 6mm Remington for years!!!! Long live the 6mm remington.
My 722 1/12 twist, against conventional wisdom, shoots 5 shot MOA groups with Sierra 100gr Pro Hunters with a max load of IMR 4350. It also likes the long discontinued Speer round nose 105s. Each rifle is is an entity unto itself.
I think Charles Whitman liked these.
Most people ignore that Remington tried to resurrect the cartridge by changing its name to 6mm Remington Magnum.
I have got a 6mm that was put together by someone sometime ago. It has a 24″ inch Ruger barrel, a Monte Carlo stock, a sight that comes with 10x Japenese scope mounts. I believe it was built intentionally with sights on the 24″ inch barrel. It sure is pretty. The scope mounts has one screw at the back and two in front. I believe the Carl Costafson receiver I have is the center and the real reason why I have the firearm.
1955 IS A LONG TIME TO ARGUE over the .243 Winchester and the 6mm Remington. I shoot Caribou exclusively and they are bigger than Whitetail Deer in every way. And I will never see a Whitetail Deer because I live in Canada where good old 55 is. I am on the edge of permafrost. I have seen the 243 Winchester and the 6mm Remington take Caribou in the past. Personally, I will take the 6mm Remington and the rest of family can take the .243 Winchester. I find the 1955 arguments long over. I want us to enjoy the firearms that is before us. PEACE!
I own a custom .244 Remington built on a 95 Mauser action. Also have an M77 Ruger in 6mm Rem. built in 1970.
Love them both. I always hunted deer size game with the old style 95 gr. Nosler partition which shot well in both. Speer and Hornady made a 105 RN that shot ok in the .244 also.
They now both love the Berger 80 gr. HP Varmint bullet. The 6mm shoots it better at 200 yds. than 100. Goes from just under 1 moa to about 0.6 moa. Gotta love that.
I consistently had 3 shot 1/2 inch groups at 100 yds with mine. Mine is the 1:12 and I bought it when it came out, still have it. I have taken many whitetail (87 to 90 grain bullets) but the most fun was varmint hunting. Light weight bullets (60 to 70 grain, best results with boat-tails) at 3000 plus fps. It always out shot my buddies 243.
I think your info on the .244 is incorrect. I have a Remington 721ADL in .244 Remington made (according to the date code) in February 1959. It has a 26″ barrel with a 1:12 twist, and will definitely NOT stabilize 100gr bullets. Anything over 90 and accuracy goes out hte window.
My information is that Remington made the 721 in .244 with a 1:12 twist until mid 1959 when they made the change to 1:9 for the renamed 6mmRem. They did confuse things a bit in 1958 by making a 700 in .244 with a 1:10 twist. This has lead some to believe the twist in the 721 changed at this time as well, but based on my rifle, it didn’t.
JRH