NRA Smallbore Championships Go “Gender Neutral”
Report based on story by NRABlog.com
Starting this summer, the NRA National Smallbore Rifle Championships will no longer feature a separate “High Women” award. From now on, men and women will compete shoulder to shoulder in the same category — every shooter will be scored in a single group regardless of gender. (There will still be age-based categories; also men and women have always been eligible to win match top honors regardless of gender).
The reason for this change is, quite simply, that ladies can shoot as well as men (or better in many cases). Consequently, there is no need for a separate class for women: “There is a high degree of parity between men and women shooters in the smallbore championships,” said H.Q. Moody, national manager of NRA’s Rifle Department. Moody explained: “Women are rightly viewed as equals in today’s America. Shouldn’t our championships reflect that attitude as well? Our smallbore committee has discussed making the championships gender equitable for many years now and finally felt it was the right time to implement the change.”
Men and women will now compete on equal terms at the National Smallbore Championship, competing for the same honors in “gender-neutral” classifications.
Photo courtesy Shooting Sports USA.
This change was officially adopted this past January at the NRA Board of Directors winter meetings. It only affects the NRA National Smallbore Rifle Championships for now, but a positive reception could see “gender-neutrality” spread to regional matches and below, and maybe even other NRA disciplines.
History of Women’s Classfication in Smallbore Competition
The women’s category was first introduced to the smallbore championships nearly 70 years ago. Back then, military shooters were dominating the field so convincingly that several new categories were created to recognize the accomplishments of civilian shooters. This move saw the creation of not just the Woman category, but also Junior and Senior. The latter two have since expanded even further (e.g. Grand Senior, Intermediate Junior) to accommodate the skill discrepancies within levels and they make perfect sense to have; junior shooters are generally more inexperienced and many seniors are affected by physical limitations.
But the same can no longer be said of the women’s category. While military shooters still do very well nowadays, the proliferation of female service members has seen quite a few woman match winners. There are also a number of extraordinary female civilian shooters who finish near the top of each year’s overall standings. For instance, women shooters placed first in each of the two aggregate matches that determined last year’s Conventional 3-Position Champion.
Similar Posts:
- National Junior Olympic Shooting Championships in Colorado
- Video Features Shooting Programs for Women
- Women On Target Program Logs 50,000th Participant
- More Female Shooters and Firearms Owners Than Ever
- National Championships at Camp Perry Start July 13th
Tags: Championships, Gender Neutral, NRA, NRABlog.com, Rimfire, Smallbore, Women
Makes sense.
Your description here misrepresents the situation. There were only special awards for women, not men, and both men and women always have competed directly against each other for the same awards, at least nationally in NRA competitions. The only thing that’s changing is the elimination of the “high woman” award.
Editor: The above comment is from Reya Kempley one of the nation’s top smallbore shooters. Reya is 100% correct that the main point of the change is to eliminate a female-specific award. FWIW, many women have won the non-gender-specific awards many times. This is explained in the last paragraph. And Reya is correct that men and women, at least at the nationals, shoot in the same events, and are squaded together. It is different in some collegiate and international compatitions.
Did thethey turn 6 winners into 3 winners. Also what’s the purpose of the paper behind the target?
The match winner is the MATCH WINNER regardless of gender or age! The only change I am seeing is fewer awards.
Not happy about it. They have had a national trophy for women prone and 3P for decades. Now that trophy will sit on a shelf. Women always competed against men for the open championship so I don’t see why keeping the tradition of a womens champion was suddenly a bad thing.
The purpose of the second paper in the back is to verify that 5 shots are on each bullseye.
Trophies and awards come and go. NRA trophies won’t sit on the shelf, it will probably be rededicated over to another shooting discipline. There is no reason in ANY of the shooting disciplines to give a separate woman award. Maybe in the beginning you needed a special award for women, but not anymore.
The paper behind the target is to indicate cross fires and if you shoot really tight groups. You can “prove” you fired 5 shots per target.