California Bans Use of Firearms Words as “Hate Speech”
A new statute passed in California will bar state employees (as well as teachers, police personnel, and health care workers) from using a variety of firearms terms in official communications. California Assembly Bill 2243, authored by Assemblyman Tony Fulenzo (D. Los Angeles), defines over 30 gun-related words as “hate speech”. Under existing California law, any words/phrases defined as “hate speech” are proscribed (forbidden) in official publications, school textbooks, and all public-sector communications (including email). By effect of AB 2243 then, dozens of gun-related nouns, verbs, and adjectives will be banned, and “shall no longer be uttered or used in the State of California by any public agent or employee”.
Assemblyman Fulenzo said his intent in sponsoring AB 2243 was to alter public attitudes toward firearms, and in particular, to convince school children that firearms are bad. “We want to prevent young kids from perceiving firearms as ‘cool’ or ‘exciting’. The best way to do that is to bury the subject altogether. We need to dismantle the ‘gun culture’. That begins with banning the words themselves.”
Fulenzo said AB 2243 was inspired by existing bans on racist “hate speech”: “We don’t want children to read about guns or talk about guns. The first step, therefore, is to remove firearms-related words from textbooks, classroom presentations, and state documents. This is not something new. California has done the same thing with hateful words directed at minority groups. In California, by law, we have banned the use of the ‘N’ word (and other racist terms) in official state publications and school textbooks. Now we are just following that practice and banning the ‘G’ word (i.e. ‘gun’) and similar firearms-related hate speech”.
Ban on Gun Words in Arizona Next?
Meanwhile, in neighboring Arizona, anti-gun groups have called for the passage of similar legislation banning the use of firearms-related terminology.
Permitted Word Equivalencies for Banned Firearm Terms
When enacted into law, AB 2243 will ban more than 30 firearm-related words, including “gun”, “pistol”, “rifle”, “bullet” and other commonly-used words. Where it is necessary to reference a firearm, as in a police report, AB 2243 provides for substitute words or phrases. AB 2243 recognizes that, in some instances, it will be necessary to mention firearms-related facts in official documents. By using these officially-designated substitute words, firearms-related facts can be logged without resort to banned “hate speech”.
| Gun = “Gunk”
Pistol = “Piddle” Rifle = “Ripple” Shoot = “Suit” Bullet = “Mullet” Cartridge = “Partridge” |
How to Use CA-Approved Substitute Words:
Under AB 2243, if an official report requires description of a hate speech item, then the approved replacement words shall be used instead of the prohibited terms. For example, if a state-funded hospital treats a pistol wound, this shall be listed as a “piddle wound” in the medical report. Likewise the recovery of cartridges at a crime scene by police shall be recorded as a “partridge recovery” in the incident report. |
New Law Does Not Restrict Speech by Non-Governmental Entities
This new law only applies to “public sector” entities (schools, police/sheriff agencies, hospitals/health clinics, state and municipal agencies). Private businesses, including newspapers and web sites, will still be allowed to use firearms-related words without the threat of prosecution. Likewise, private citizens will still be allowed to say “gun”, “pistol”, or “rifle” etc. in their own private communications. However internet posting of hate speech involving forbidden firearm words will be monitored by a new California State Agency. This new Agency, the California Office of Firearms Hate Speech (COFHS) will be funded by a new 5% sales tax on firearms ammunition and components.
Similar Posts:
- California Bans Use of Firearms Terminology as “Hate Speech”
- Failure of Euro-Style Gun Control Explained by Professor Lott
- Restrictive Gun Laws Blocked in New York and California
- Semi-Auto Ban Vetoed in California, But Lead Ammo Ban Approved
- Gun Ban List — Prohibited Guns, Ammo, and Parts in Every State
Share the post "California Bans Use of Firearms Words as “Hate Speech”"
Tags: AB 2243, Assembly, California, Censorship, Gun, Hate Speech, Pistol, rifle, Sacramento
Saw this days later and it got me. The reason it was so easy to get me on this is that I live in California and this is not really very far fetched at all. In fact the idiot that wrote this probably just gave these morons we call state government the idea to really do this!
Communism at its finest….allow certain speech to be said but once the government hears what they dont want to hear, then ban it…typical f***tard commies
Well…if I must post a belated “SARC” tag, here it is. Everyone I know on this site called me laughing at my post. They knew it would stir the pot. So, please let me clarify my stance on the aforementioned politicians in my post… oh, I was told I cannot use that type of language here. I have started a new business manufacturing guillotines and boiled rope though.
Truly an evil post for 4/1. Laughed my guns (oops, I should say “gunks”) off. For the state on the brink of sliding into the Pacific, this legislation is not inconceivable.
Not that I don’t believe this, but when I verified AB 2243 at the official California State’s website at http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/ the bill is totally different. It’s introduced by Wood, and it’s about cannabis tax. Perhaps I was looking at the wrong thing, but I also searched Senate Bills and by author and found nothing. Can someone please confirm the truthfulness of this? Thank you!
How frigging stupid can our government get. It’s this kind of PC B.S. That’s destroyed our once great nation.