After the Argument — Supreme Court Appears to Favor Extension of Second Amendment
Lyle Denniston, reporter for the Scotus (Supreme Court of the United States) Blog, attended the oral argument in McDonald v. Chicago (Docket 08-1521) this morning. Analyzing the comments and questions of the Justices, Denniston concluded that the High Court is very likely to extend the Second Amendment to state and municipal actions, on the basis of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment. However, the Justices were skeptical of the argument that “incorporation” of the Second Amendment was likewise mandated by the “privileges and immunities” section of the 14th Amendment.
CLICK HERE for transcript of Oral Argument
(PDF file, 77 pages, 342kb).
Denniston writes: “The Supreme Court on Tuesday seemed poised to require state and local governments to obey the Second Amendment guarantee of a personal right to a gun, but with perhaps considerable authority to regulate that right. The dominant sentiment on the Court was to extend the Amendment beyond the federal level, based on the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of “due process,” since doing so through another part of the 14th Amendment would raise too many questions about what other rights might emerge.”
During the course of the oral argument, the Justices disagreed as to the scope of the Second Amendment — whether it should be limited to a “core right” of self-defense or whether it could be applied much more broadly in future cases. The Scotus Blog explained: “The liberal wing of the Court appeared to be making a determined effort to hold the expanded Amendment in check, but even the conservatives open to applying the Second Amendment to states, counties and cities seemed ready to concede some — but perhaps fewer — limitations. The eagerly awaited oral argument in McDonald, et al., v. Chicago, et al. found all members of the Court actively involved except the usually silent Justice Clarence Thomas. And, while no one said that the issue of “incorporating” the Second Amendment into the 14th Amendment had already been decided before the argument had even begun, the clear impression was that the Court majority was at least sentimentally in favor of that, with only the dimensions of the expansion to be worked out in this case and in a strong of likely precedents coming as time went on.”
We recommend that those interested in Second Amendment issues read the full Scotus Blog Entry, which includes detailed explanations of the key arguments, and analyses of how individual justices stand on the question of how the Second Amendment should be applied to the States — i.e. whether broadly or narrowly.
CLICK HERE to read SCOTUS BLOG re McDonald v. Chicago.
Similar Posts:
- High Court Hears "McDonald v. Chicago" Today
- Transcript of Supreme Court Argument is Available
- U.S. Supreme Court ‘Incorporates’ Second Amendment to States in Challenge to Chicago Gun Ban
- U.S. Supreme Court to Review Chicago Gun Case
- U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Review Firearms Cases
Share the post "After the Argument — Supreme Court Appears to Favor Extension of Second Amendment"
Tags: Chicago, McDonald, SCOTUS, Supreme Court
I just want to say I very much appreciate the coverage provided by 6mmBR.com on this issue and subject — awesome job and great info!
Robert Whitley
I have to add my second to what Robert has contributed above.
Having lived in Illinois all my life (so far) I’m appalled by the attitude engendered by city & county politicos when it comes to firearms. It’s always been a them vs. us argument, them being “everybody else” while the US pertains only to themselves & their cronies.