California Governor Signs Bills Mandating Long-Gun Registration and Banning Open Carry
Dark Day for 2nd Amendment Rights
California Governor Jerry Brown acted on several firearms-related bills on Sunday, October 9th. Gov. Brown waited until literally the last hour on Sunday to act on firearms-related legislation sent to his desk this session. Several anti-gun and anti-industry bills were signed into law, including long-gun registration. “Sadly, the steady erosion of the Second Amendment in California continues,” said Lawrence G. Keane, NSSF senior vice president and general counsel. “Gov. Brown has now proven that he no more respects freedom and the individual right protected by the Second Amendment than his predecessor. These bills will increase costs for the taxpayer and the state’s retailers, most of whom are small mom-and-pop businesses. It will cost the state jobs and tax revenue, all the while doing absolutely nothing to reduce crime.” Below are summaries of the gun-related bills signed into law by Gov. Brown:
AB 809 (Feuer, Democrat, West Hollywood): Long-gun registration: SIGNED INTO LAW. In a nutshell, AB 809 mandates long-gun registration, starting January 1st, 2014. The bill does this, essentially, by treating long guns the same as handguns. The bill requires FFLs to make long gun sales information available to the California Dept. of Justice, and imposes new requirements on persons bringing long guns into the state. AB 809 also burdens “peace officers” with responsibilities for the compilation and retention of long-gun information.
SB 819 (Leno, Democrat, San Francisco): SIGNED INTO LAW. This bill allows the California Department of Justice (DOJ) to use Dealer Record of Sales (DROS) funds for purposes unrelated to administration of background checks. There is currently a lawsuit pending that challenges the past misuse/misappropriation of these funds by the DOJ. The DROS fee now becomes a sanctioned revenue stream for the DOJ.
AB 144 (Portantino, Democrat, La Canada): SIGNED INTO LAW. This bill bans open carry in the state. This revokes a long-standing right of California citizens that has been in effect for more than a century. The bill would make it a misdemeanor to openly carry an unloaded handgun on the person or in a motor vehicle in public areas and would make it a misdemeanor to openly carry an exposed handgun in a public place or public street. Existing laws otherwise ban open carry of loaded handguns and ban concealed carry without a permit — something virtually impossible to obtain in many California Counties.
SB 610 (Wright, Democrat, So. Central Los Angeles): SIGNED INTO LAW. This bill, which modifies the state’s concealed-carry application process, may actually benefit CCW applicants in a modest fashion. First, the bill provides that no concealed carry applicant would be required to obtain liability insurance as a condition of the license. This bill also provides that the applicant would not be required to pay for training courses prior to a determination of good cause being made.
Photo of Gov. Jerry Brown by Phil Konstantin.Brown Vetoes Vague Ammo Registration Bill
One source of good news was Gov. Brown’s veto of SB 427 (De Leon, Democrat). This was sort of a re-run of an earlier bill (“handgun ammunition registration”) that Gov. Schwarzenegger signed into law. That statute was successfully challenged in court as unconstitutionally vague. The case is on appeal. DeLeon’s revived bill required registration of specified calibers but also contained vague language regarding “handgun ammunition.” In vetoing the bill for now, the governor said, “Let’s keep our powder dry on amendments until the court case runs its course”.
Similar Posts:
- Three Anti-Gun Bills Defeated in California Legislature
- 65,000 Letters Ask California Governor to Veto Anti-Gun Bills
- Web Seminar Covers New California Gun Laws
- Californians Seek Vetos of Radical Anti-Gun Legislation
- Sweeping Anti-Gun Legislation Enacted in California
Share the post "California Governor Signs Bills Mandating Long-Gun Registration and Banning Open Carry"
Tags: 2nd Amendment, Democratic Party, Guns, Jerry Brown, Open Carry, Rifle Registration
As an Australian, we let this crap slide, and now we can’t have rifles like 338 lapuas in some states, and are not allowed self defense as a legitimate reason to aquire a firearm.
we are also not allowed the use of semi-auto’s or handguns for anything other than use at a range for an ‘approved’ activity…
Not overturning this before it takes hold, and you will be in the same boat
You are so right. We Americans are bad about letting crap slide.
We have been on a long slide for years in which various levels of government have in effect told us that if we will give up just a little more freedom, that we will be safer. You tell me, has it worked? Are we safer, or just less free? California is a beautiful state that has a long history of bad government, Democrat, and Republican.
I fail to understand why liberals deny rights to legal citizens and legislate that citizens and their property are registered and documented by the liberals, yet illegal, criminal, non-citizens are left alone and even protected by the state and it’s laws. More idiocracy from the land of “FRUITS and NUTS”.
The liberals that control this state aren’t interested in our “rights” they’re only interested in preserving there power, that’s why over 3000 people a week are leaving the state, ultimately the only people left here will be the super rich and those that mow their lawns.
If you can’t vote them out, then MOVE! Leave the state and see how long it takes before it becomes a militarized state or give it back to Mexico.
I can’t believe how many firearms companies still do business or are located in the P.R. of Cali. Ronnie Barrett has had it right for years. He won’t do business with any California agency. I know other states are welcoming California firearms businesses with open arms. The Dakotas are recruiting and offering incentives for businesses (hint hint Berger) to move there and I know Michigan could use some of those companies.
Vote em out! or leave them to their own devices.
Since our total handgun ban way back in the 1990s, you can bet your bottom dollar/pound sterling, that any legislation in relation to control of any firearm/ammunition etc will not be to be benefit of any firearm holder.
If there is one thing I have learned is NEVER to trust a politician right or left wing or liberal, and if he smiles at you, distrust him/her even more, because they are out to get you. The erosion is little by little so watch out America your in their sights. Good luck
Canada tried a gun registry. $2 billion wasted. The Canadian government is currently drafting legislation to shut down the registry and destroy all of the records which have been on many occasions leaked to thieves who used the data to break into homes that had large collections. New Zealand had one and also dismantled it. Funny to see a US state recycling other countries failed policies.
How is it that Brown is not a traitor by passing these “laws?” (its a plain volaition of the Constitution) This isn’t about lowering crime, public safety, or any other crap spewing from some politician’s mouth. Its about CONTROL – appears the good people of California need to get their pitchforks out.
Does anyone have a list of Gun related businesses in California?
Registration = CONFISCATION !
Time to either have an armed uprising backed by the U.S.Constituition and overthrow the tyrants of the union of soviets socialist california or . . . will the last true American leaving california please bring the flag.
Having “done” eight years in the People’s Republic of CA, I can attest to there being some of the finest gun owning, conservative folks I have ever had a pleasure to meet. All of the power and influence is in SF and LA, and the rest of the state is essentially unrepresented. Unfortunately, the Heller decision did allow for registration as a legal tool of the states, so it is unlikely this one will be brought down on a constitutional challenge.
Good luck to shooters in the Golden State, they are going to need it.
This is so sad. All of the problems facing the people of California and this is what their politicians are most concerned with.
It is indeed sad to see such obtuse and non-evidence based decisions being propegated by people, whose only qualification is a well polished ability to lie and waste public money.
As another Canadian employed in public safety, i can tell you that the gang-banging schitt rats get their guns from sources that ‘bypass the registry’, and there are tens, if not hundreds of thousands of hard working honest firearms owners that never bought into the Canadian boondoggle and are criminals for not registering their guns.
Evidence has shown over and over again that it accomplishes nothing, does nothing to take firearms away from criminals, and only makes criminals out of responsible firearms owners.
I mourne your loss of freedoms and the arrival of “Big Brother” in California.
It is NOT a dark day for the 2nd Amendment. It is a dark day for the lazy citizens who are letting this happen. Are there protests at the capitol over this? Doubtful. Are the governor’s phone lines burning up? They should be.
This is flat out an unconstitutional power grab. They have no constitutional authority to subvert the federal law called the U.S. Constitution. If they succeeded from the Union of the 50 States then maybe. But as far as I know California is not one of the States that can lawfully succeed. I think only Texas has the legal right if I’m not mistaken.
California: you should have every gun shop owner and all of it’s customers be showing up at the Capitol or at the very least at their State legislative representative: both Senate and Representatives. Are there not any activists organizing a resistance to this?
What would George Washington and Thomas Jefferson do?