Gone in Six Seconds — The Shocking Truth of Barrel Life
Here’s a little known fact that may startle most readers, even experienced gunsmiths: your barrel wears out in a matter of seconds. The useful life of a typical match barrel, in terms of actual bullet-in-barrel time, is only a few seconds. How can that be, you ask? Well you need to look at the actual time that bullets spend traveling through the bore during the barrel’s useful life. (Hint: it’s not very long).
Bullet-Time-in-Barrel Calculations
If a bullet flies at 3000 fps, it will pass through a 24″ (two-foot) barrel in 1/1500th of a second. If you have a useful barrel life of 3000 rounds, that would translate to just two seconds of actual bullet-in-barrel operating time.
Ah, but it’s not that simple. Your bullet starts at zero velocity and then accelerates as it passes through the bore, so the projectile’s average velocity is not the same as the 3000 fps muzzle velocity. So how long does a centerfire bullet (with 3000 fps MV) typically stay in the bore? The answer is about .002 seconds. This number was calculated by Varmint Al, who is a really smart engineer dude who worked at the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, a government think tank that develops neutron bombs, fusion reactors and other simple stuff.
On his Barrel Tuner page, Varmint Al figured out that the amount of time a bullet spends in a barrel during firing is under .002 seconds. Al writes: “The approximate time that it takes a 3300 fps muzzle velocity bullet to exit the barrel, assuming a constant acceleration, is 0.0011 seconds. Actual exit times would be longer since the bullet is not under constant acceleration.”
We’ll use the .002 number for our calculations here, knowing that the exact number depends on barrel length and muzzle velocity. But .002 is a good average that errs, if anything, on the side of more barrel operating life rather than less.
So, if a bullet spends .002 seconds in the barrel during each shot, and you get 3000 rounds of accurate barrel life, how much actual firing time does the barrel deliver before it loses accuracy? That’s simple math: 3000 x .002 seconds = 6 seconds.
Gone in Six Seconds. Want to Cry Now?
Six seconds. That’s how long your barrel actually functions (in terms of bullet-in-barrel shot time) before it “goes south.” Yes, we know some barrels last longer than 3000 rounds. On the other hand, plenty of .243 Win and 6.5-284 barrels lose accuracy in 1500 rounds or less. If your barrel loses accuracy at the 1500-round mark, then it only worked for three seconds! Of course, if you are shooting a “long-lived” .308 Win that goes 5000 rounds before losing accuracy, then you get a whopping TEN seconds of barrel life. Anyway you look at it, a rifle barrel has very little longevity, when you consider actual firing time.
People already lament the high cost of replacing barrels. Now that you know how short-lived barrels really are, you can complain even louder. Of course our analysis does give you even more of an excuse to buy a nice new Bartlein, Krieger, Shilen etc. barrel for that fine rifle of yours.
Similar Posts:
- A Few Seconds at Best — The Short Operating Life of Barrels
- Toast in Six Seconds — The Brutal Truth of Short Barrel Life
- Toast in Six Seconds — Brutal Truth of Barrel Life (and Death)
- Gone in SIX Seconds — The Brutal Truth of Short Barrel Life
- Barrel Life — Key Factors That Affect Barrel Wear Over Time
Share the post "Gone in Six Seconds — The Shocking Truth of Barrel Life"
Tags: ballistics, Barrel, bore, Varmint Al
actually its should beshorter than .002 sec. not longer. most of the ultimate velocity is there in the first few inches.
Is the distributed “loss” equal on the entire barrel, or heaviest as the bullet starts, i.e., near the chamber? Is rechambering a barrel to restore barrel life worthwhile?
Tenring – a lot of target shooters have their barrels set back and re-chambered since most of the wear is at that end of the barrel.
Shocking truth or non-issue?
Playing with irrelevant numbers takes us nowhere.
In my experience most barrels are ruined by cleaning (or lack of it), not by shooting.
“Irrelevant numbers”? Are they?
If this analysis does demonstrate the very short actual “run-time” barrels offer, that can help shooters understand how important it is to avoid overheating the barrel or doing anything that might otherwise exacerbate barrel wear. The knowledge that a barrel may only withstand 5-10 seconds (of firing) is also making me re-examine my ideas about bullet friction-reducing coatings.
Now another question on the subject of barrel wear. How does the composition of the bullet effect the results knowing that jacketed bullets are generally harder that lead cast with lube.
Trivial……………….
$200.00 per second, Ouch!
$200.00 per second translates to $12,000.00 an hour… Not even the Bunny Ranch costs that much! ;D
Haha,
A soon as people see numbers they go nuts. See it all the time at work where operators used to see just two lights flash and now with new gear see numbers and go nuts at what they are seeing even though it works ten times better than before. It’s psycological.
How many companies have tested moly etc and never been able to prove anything related to barrel life. If the barrel lasts 1800 or 2200 rounds is a non-issue, it may go at 500 or last to 3000, no one can tell beforehand.
Just shoot the barrel and perform proper maintenance to keep accuracy there. All else is futility.
@ Erik Cortina
That would be 72,000 an hour… not 12,000
What happens when you apply this theory to a 22LR?
Uh huh!